Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia
The aim of this study was to classify and characterize the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia based on the fat, protein, and total solid (TS) contents. Using a hierarchical procedure, data on milk from river buffaloes (n = 7,726) a...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Redalyc
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407660734005 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/40210 https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v66n1.79401 |
| id |
RepoAGROSAVIA40210 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| institution |
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria |
| collection |
Repositorio AGROSAVIA |
| language |
Inglés |
| topic |
Ganadería - L01 Búfalo de agua Producción lechera Ganado bovino Calidad Ganadería y especies menores http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8313 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4829 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1391 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6400 |
| spellingShingle |
Ganadería - L01 Búfalo de agua Producción lechera Ganado bovino Calidad Ganadería y especies menores http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8313 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4829 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1391 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6400 Barragán Hernández, W. A. Mahecha Ledesma, L. Angulo Arizala, J. Olivera Angel, M. Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia |
| description |
The aim of this study was to classify and characterize the compositional quality of milk
from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia based on the
fat, protein, and total solid (TS) contents. Using a hierarchical procedure, data on milk
from river buffaloes (n = 7,726) and cows (n = 49,330) were filtered and subjected to
cluster analysis in order to generate three groups: Normal (N), High quality (HQ) and
Poor Quality (PQ). The categorized database was then randomly separated into two sets
(training and validation) and a discriminant analysis was applied. In total, 37.3% of river
buffalo milk samples were classified as N (6.80% fat, 4.34% protein, and 16.80% TS),
13% as HQ (9.41% fat, 4.93% protein, and 19.50% TS), and 43.7% as PQ (3.95% fat,
3.92% protein, and 13.7% TS). In contrast, 41.8% of cow milk samples were classified
as N (3.64% fat, 3.37% protein, 12.42% TS), 41.2% as PQ (2.71% fat, 3.08% protein,
and 10.6% TS), and 16.9% as HQ (5.46% fat, 4.01% protein, and 14.82% TS). The
discriminant models for both river buffalo and cow milk were able to classify milk in the
N and PQ groups with >90% accuracy, and that in the HQ group with >85% accuracy. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Barragán Hernández, W. A. Mahecha Ledesma, L. Angulo Arizala, J. Olivera Angel, M. |
| author_facet |
Barragán Hernández, W. A. Mahecha Ledesma, L. Angulo Arizala, J. Olivera Angel, M. |
| author_sort |
Barragán Hernández, W. A. |
| title |
Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia |
| title_short |
Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia |
| title_full |
Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia |
| title_fullStr |
Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia |
| title_sort |
characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (bubalus bubalis) and cows (bos spp.) in colombia |
| publisher |
Redalyc |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| url |
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407660734005 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/40210 https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v66n1.79401 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT barraganhernandezwa characterizationandclassificationofthecompositionalqualityofmilkfromriverbuffaloesbubalusbubalisandcowsbossppincolombia AT mahechaledesmal characterizationandclassificationofthecompositionalqualityofmilkfromriverbuffaloesbubalusbubalisandcowsbossppincolombia AT anguloarizalaj characterizationandclassificationofthecompositionalqualityofmilkfromriverbuffaloesbubalusbubalisandcowsbossppincolombia AT oliveraangelm characterizationandclassificationofthecompositionalqualityofmilkfromriverbuffaloesbubalusbubalisandcowsbossppincolombia |
| _version_ |
1842255563861262336 |
| spelling |
RepoAGROSAVIA402102024-10-17T03:00:22Z Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia Barragán Hernández, W. A. Mahecha Ledesma, L. Angulo Arizala, J. Olivera Angel, M. Ganadería - L01 Búfalo de agua Producción lechera Ganado bovino Calidad Ganadería y especies menores http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8313 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4829 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1391 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6400 The aim of this study was to classify and characterize the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia based on the fat, protein, and total solid (TS) contents. Using a hierarchical procedure, data on milk from river buffaloes (n = 7,726) and cows (n = 49,330) were filtered and subjected to cluster analysis in order to generate three groups: Normal (N), High quality (HQ) and Poor Quality (PQ). The categorized database was then randomly separated into two sets (training and validation) and a discriminant analysis was applied. In total, 37.3% of river buffalo milk samples were classified as N (6.80% fat, 4.34% protein, and 16.80% TS), 13% as HQ (9.41% fat, 4.93% protein, and 19.50% TS), and 43.7% as PQ (3.95% fat, 3.92% protein, and 13.7% TS). In contrast, 41.8% of cow milk samples were classified as N (3.64% fat, 3.37% protein, 12.42% TS), 41.2% as PQ (2.71% fat, 3.08% protein, and 10.6% TS), and 16.9% as HQ (5.46% fat, 4.01% protein, and 14.82% TS). The discriminant models for both river buffalo and cow milk were able to classify milk in the N and PQ groups with >90% accuracy, and that in the HQ group with >85% accuracy. Universidad de Antioquia - UdeA Ganadería bovina 2024-10-16T13:33:59Z 2024-10-16T13:33:59Z 2019-04 2019 article Artículo científico http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 info:eu-repo/semantics/article https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407660734005 0120-2952 2357-3813 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/40210 https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v66n1.79401 reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia instname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA eng Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia 66 1 43 52 Alichanidis E, Moatsou G, Polychroniadou A. 2016. Composition and Properties of Non-cow Milk and Products. In: Tsakalidou E, Papadimitriou K, editors. Non-Bovine Milk and Milk Products. Elsevier Inc. p. 81-116. Anitha A, Sarjan Rao K, Suresh J, Moorthy S, Kotilinga Y. 2011. A body condition score (BCS) system in Murrah buffaloes. Buffalo Bull. 30(1): 79-96. [Asobúfalos] Asociación Colombiana de Criadores de Búfalos. 2016. Algunos aspectos del manejo de los sistemas productivos bufalinos en Colombia. 1° ed. Bogotá (CO): Asobúfalos. Borghese A. 2006. Production and morphology in dairy buffalo. In: Memorias III Simposio de Búfalos de las Américas; 2006 sept. 6-8; Medellin (CO). p. 6-8. Calderón A, García F, Martínez G. 2006. Indicadores de calidad de leches crudas en diferentes regiones de Colombia. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 11(1): 1-16. Carulla J, Ortega E. 2016. Sistemas de producción lechera en Colombia: retos y oportunidades. Arch Latinoam Prod Anim. 24(2): 83-87. Cerón M, Tonhati H, Costa C, Solarte C, Benavides O. 2003. Factores de ajuste para producción de leche en bovinos Holstein colombiano. Rev Col Cien Pecu. 16(1): 26-32. Cerón-Muñoz M, Tonhati H, Duarte J, Oliveira J, Muñoz-Berrocal M, Jurado-Gámez H. 2002. Factors Affecting Somatic Cell Counts and Their Relations with Milk and Milk Constituent Yield in Buffaloes. J Dairy Sci. 85(11). 2885–2889. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(02)74376-2. Chen B, Grandison AS, Lewis MJ. 2017. Best use for milk – A review. II – Effect of physiological, husbandry and seasonal factors on the physicochemical properties of bovine milk. Inter J of Dairy Technology. 70(2): 155-164. Doi: 10.1111/1471-0307.12355. Colman E, Waegeman W, De Baets B, Fievez V. 2015. Prediction of subacute ruminal acidosis based on milk fatty acids: A comparison of linear discriminant and support vector machine approaches for model development. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 111: 179-185. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.01.002. Correa HJ, Rodríguez YG, Pabón ML, Carulla JE. 2012. Efecto de la oferta de pasto kikuyo (Pennisetum clandestinum) sobre la producción, la calidad de la leche y el balance de nitrógeno en vacas Holstein. Livestock Research for Rural Development [Internet]. [cited 2018 jun 18]; 24(Art. 204). Disponible en: http://www.lrrd. org/lrrd24/11/corr24204.htm. [DANE] Departamento Nacional de Estadística. 2015. Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria [Internet]. Bogotá (CO): DANE; [cited 2017 feb. 10]. Disponible en: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/ investigaciones/agropecuario/enda/ena/2015/ boletin_ena_2015.pdf. Faostat. 2017. Livestock Primary: Milk Whole Fresh Cow [Internet]. Roma (IT): FAO; [citado 2017 feb. 20]. Disponible en: http://www.fao. org/faostat/en/#data/QL. Godden S, Bey R, Farnsworth R, Reneau J, LaValle M. 2002. Field validation of a milk line sampling device for monitoring milk quality and udder health. J Dairy Sci. 85(6): 1468-1475. Doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74215-X. Hair JF, Babin BJ, Black WC, Anderson RE. 2009. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. 7° ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson. Holmann FJ, Rivas L, Carulla JE, Giraldo LA, Guzman S, Martínez M, Rivera B, Medina A, Farrow A. 2003. Evolución de los sistemas de producción de leche en el trópico latinoamericano y su interrelación con los mercados: un análisis del caso colombiano. Documento de trabajo 193. Cali (CO): CIAT. Hurtado-Lugo N, Cerón-Muñoz MF, Lopera MI, Bernal A, Cifuentes T. 2005. Determinación de parámetros físico-químicos de leche Bufalina en un sistema de producción orgánica. Livestock Research for Rural Development [Internet]. [Citado 2017 feb. 20]; 17(Art. 1). Disponible en: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/1/hurt17001.htm. [IFCN] International Farm Comparison Network. 2014. IFCN Dairy Report 2014: For a Better Understanding of the Dairy World. Kiel (GR): Hemme T, editor. IFCN - Dairy Research Center. Juárez-Barrientos JM, Díaz-Rivera P, Rodríguez- Miranda J, Martínez-Sánchez CE, Hernández- Santos B, Ramírez-Rivera E, Herman-Lara E. 2016. Caracterización de la leche y clasificación de calidad mediante análisis Cluster en sistemas de doble propósito. Rev Mex Cien Pecu. 7(4): 525-537. López P, Paseiro P, Simal-Lozano J, Simal Gándara J. 1992. Aplicación de técnicas multivariantes a resultados de los análisis en leche natural de vaca: III. Análisis discriminante. Anal Bromatol. 44(4): 247-256. Melzer N, Wittenburg D, Hartwig S, Jakubowski S, Kesting U, Willmitzer L, Repsilber D. 2013. Investigating associations between milk metabolite profiles and milk traits of Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 96(3): 1521-1534. Doi: 10.3168/ jds.2012-5743. Olivera M, editora. 2007. Buenas Prácticas de Producción Primaria de Leche. Contexto socioeconómico, morfofisiológico, sanitario y normativo. Medellín (CO): Fondo Editorial Biogénesis, Universidad de Antioquia. Palmquist DL, Beaulieu AD, Barbano DM. 1993. Feed and animal factors influencing milk fat composition. J Dairy Sci. 76(6): 1753-1771. Doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77508-6. Patiño EM. 2004. Factores que afectan la composición físico química de la leche de Búfalos (Bubalus bubalis) en el nordeste Argentino. RedVet. 5(10). Rivera JE, Cuartas CA, Naranjo JF, Tafur O, Hurtado EA, Arenas FA, Murgueitio E. 2015. Efecto de la oferta y el consumo de Tithonia diversifolia en un sistema silvopastoril intensivo (SSPi), en la calidad y productividad de leche bovina en el piedemonte Amazónico colombiano. Livestock Research for Rural Development [Internet]. [Citado 2017 feb. 20]; 27(10): Article #189. Disponible en: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/10/ rive27189.html. Ruiz JD. 2016. Producción bufalina en Colombia: del trópico para el mundo. CES Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. 11(2): 5-5. Schwendel BH, Wester TJ, Morel PCH, Tavendale MH, Deadman C, Shadbolt NM, Otter DE. 2015. Invited review: Organic and conventionally produced milk - An evaluation of factors influencing milk composition. J Dairy Sci. 98(2): 721-746. Doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8389. Silanikove N, Leitner G, Merin U. 2016. Influence of animal health, breed, and diet on non-cow milk composition. In: Tsakalidou E, Papadimitriou K, editors. Non-bovine milk and milk products. Elsevier. p. 61–79. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ B9780128033616000041. Steen A, Østeras O, Grønstøl H. 1996. Evaluation of additional acetone and urea analyses, and of the fat‐lactose‐quotient in cow milk samples in the herd recording system in Norway. J Veterinary Medicine Series A. 43(3): 181-191. Sutton JD, Morant SV. 1989. A review of the potential of nutrition to modify milk fat and protein. Livestock Production Science. 23(3-4): 219-237. Doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(89)90073-0. Tafur M, Nieto A. 2011. Las buenas prácticas ganaderas en la producción de leche [Internet]. 1° ed. Bogotá (CO): Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario – ICA / Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural; [citado 2017 feb. 20]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2DuGoyG. Team R. 2016. The R project for statistical computing [Internet]. St. Louis, Missouri (USA): The R Foundation; [cited 2016 oct. 20]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/. Tonhati H, Mendoza-Sánchez G, Sesana RC, Aspilcueta RR, Galvão De Albuquerque L. 2008. Programa de mejoramiento genético de búfalos. Rev Arg Prod Anim. 28(1): 53-67. Tripaldi C. 2005. Buffalo milk quality. In: Borghese A, editor. Buffalo Production and Research - REU Technical Series 67 [Internet]. Roma (IT): FAO Regional Office for Europe. p. 173-183; [citado 2017 feb. 20]. Disponible en: http:// www.fao.org/3/ah847e/ah847e.pdf. Tufarelli V, Dario M, Laudadio V. 2008. Diet composition and milk characteristics of Mediterranean water buffaloes reared in Southeastern Italy during spring season. Livestock Research for Rural Development [Internet]. [Citado 2017 feb. 20]; 20(10): Article #165. Disponible en: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/10/tufa20165.htm. Zicarelli L. 2004. Buffalo milk: its properties, dairy yield and mozzarella production. Vet Res Communications. 28(Suppl. 1): 127-135. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VERC.0000. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf application/pdf Colombia Redalyc Rev Med Vet Zoot; Vol. 66, Núm. 1 (2019): Rev Med Vet Zoot (Abril);p. 43 - 52. |