Analysis of the Physiological and Yield Performance of Six Quinoa Cultivars in Colombia Under Controlled Conditions
The great diversity of quinoa allows variations in physiological, production, and compositional performance. This study aimed to evaluate six quinoa cultivars through the physiological and nutritional responses of their seeds. Different dynamics were identified in the plant height, and the number of...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artículo |
Language: | Español |
Published: |
Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38833 https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2512 |
id |
RepoAGROSAVIA38833 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
institution |
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria |
collection |
Repositorio AGROSAVIA |
language |
Español |
topic |
Arreglo y sistemas de cultivo - F08 Quinua Clorofilas Fenología Composición Transversal http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13716 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1577 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5774 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331025 |
spellingShingle |
Arreglo y sistemas de cultivo - F08 Quinua Clorofilas Fenología Composición Transversal http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13716 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1577 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5774 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331025 García Parra, Miguel Roa Acosta, Diego Colmenares Cruz, Andrés Stechauner Rohringer, Roman Ramírez, Jorge Andrés Cuellar Rodríguez, Luz Angela Soler Fonseca, Diana Analysis of the Physiological and Yield Performance of Six Quinoa Cultivars in Colombia Under Controlled Conditions |
description |
The great diversity of quinoa allows variations in physiological, production, and compositional performance. This study aimed to evaluate six quinoa cultivars through the physiological and nutritional responses of their seeds. Different dynamics were identified in the plant height, and the number of leaves was adjusted to sigmoidal models with R2 greater than 0.97 and 0.77, respectively. The chlorophyll concentration varied through the phenological phases, as did the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II.Differences in the quinoa grains were found between CIEL*a*b* colorimetric coordinates and protein,carbohydrate, and fat contents. In this sense, quinoa cultivars manifest different biological behaviorsassociated with their genetic nature. Besides, a relationship between cultivars and seed composition wasrecognized. These results will allow researchers to study other significant differences between the precocityexpressed by the Puno, Nariño, and Titicaca cultivars and those with a longer phenological cycle such as theSoracá cultivar. |
format |
Artículo |
author |
García Parra, Miguel Roa Acosta, Diego Colmenares Cruz, Andrés Stechauner Rohringer, Roman Ramírez, Jorge Andrés Cuellar Rodríguez, Luz Angela Soler Fonseca, Diana |
author_facet |
García Parra, Miguel Roa Acosta, Diego Colmenares Cruz, Andrés Stechauner Rohringer, Roman Ramírez, Jorge Andrés Cuellar Rodríguez, Luz Angela Soler Fonseca, Diana |
author_sort |
García Parra, Miguel |
title |
Analysis of the Physiological and Yield Performance of Six Quinoa Cultivars in Colombia Under Controlled Conditions |
title_short |
Analysis of the Physiological and Yield Performance of Six Quinoa Cultivars in Colombia Under Controlled Conditions |
title_full |
Analysis of the Physiological and Yield Performance of Six Quinoa Cultivars in Colombia Under Controlled Conditions |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the Physiological and Yield Performance of Six Quinoa Cultivars in Colombia Under Controlled Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the Physiological and Yield Performance of Six Quinoa Cultivars in Colombia Under Controlled Conditions |
title_sort |
analysis of the physiological and yield performance of six quinoa cultivars in colombia under controlled conditions |
publisher |
Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38833 https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2512 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT garciaparramiguel analysisofthephysiologicalandyieldperformanceofsixquinoacultivarsincolombiaundercontrolledconditions AT roaacostadiego analysisofthephysiologicalandyieldperformanceofsixquinoacultivarsincolombiaundercontrolledconditions AT colmenarescruzandres analysisofthephysiologicalandyieldperformanceofsixquinoacultivarsincolombiaundercontrolledconditions AT stechaunerrohringerroman analysisofthephysiologicalandyieldperformanceofsixquinoacultivarsincolombiaundercontrolledconditions AT ramirezjorgeandres analysisofthephysiologicalandyieldperformanceofsixquinoacultivarsincolombiaundercontrolledconditions AT cuellarrodriguezluzangela analysisofthephysiologicalandyieldperformanceofsixquinoacultivarsincolombiaundercontrolledconditions AT solerfonsecadiana analysisofthephysiologicalandyieldperformanceofsixquinoacultivarsincolombiaundercontrolledconditions AT garciaparramiguel analisisdelcomportamientofisiologicoyproductivodeseiscultivaresdequinuadecolombiabajocondicionescontroladas AT roaacostadiego analisisdelcomportamientofisiologicoyproductivodeseiscultivaresdequinuadecolombiabajocondicionescontroladas AT colmenarescruzandres analisisdelcomportamientofisiologicoyproductivodeseiscultivaresdequinuadecolombiabajocondicionescontroladas AT stechaunerrohringerroman analisisdelcomportamientofisiologicoyproductivodeseiscultivaresdequinuadecolombiabajocondicionescontroladas AT ramirezjorgeandres analisisdelcomportamientofisiologicoyproductivodeseiscultivaresdequinuadecolombiabajocondicionescontroladas AT cuellarrodriguezluzangela analisisdelcomportamientofisiologicoyproductivodeseiscultivaresdequinuadecolombiabajocondicionescontroladas AT solerfonsecadiana analisisdelcomportamientofisiologicoyproductivodeseiscultivaresdequinuadecolombiabajocondicionescontroladas |
_version_ |
1808104791353589760 |
spelling |
RepoAGROSAVIA388332024-05-07T13:17:31Z Analysis of the Physiological and Yield Performance of Six Quinoa Cultivars in Colombia Under Controlled Conditions Análisis del comportamiento fisiológico y productivo de seis cultivares de quinua de Colombia bajo condiciones controladas Análisis del comportamiento fisiológico y productivo de seis cultivares de quinua de Colombia bajo condiciones controladas García Parra, Miguel Roa Acosta, Diego Colmenares Cruz, Andrés Stechauner Rohringer, Roman Ramírez, Jorge Andrés Cuellar Rodríguez, Luz Angela Soler Fonseca, Diana Arreglo y sistemas de cultivo - F08 Quinua Clorofilas Fenología Composición Transversal http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13716 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1577 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5774 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331025 The great diversity of quinoa allows variations in physiological, production, and compositional performance. This study aimed to evaluate six quinoa cultivars through the physiological and nutritional responses of their seeds. Different dynamics were identified in the plant height, and the number of leaves was adjusted to sigmoidal models with R2 greater than 0.97 and 0.77, respectively. The chlorophyll concentration varied through the phenological phases, as did the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II.Differences in the quinoa grains were found between CIEL*a*b* colorimetric coordinates and protein,carbohydrate, and fat contents. In this sense, quinoa cultivars manifest different biological behaviorsassociated with their genetic nature. Besides, a relationship between cultivars and seed composition wasrecognized. These results will allow researchers to study other significant differences between the precocityexpressed by the Puno, Nariño, and Titicaca cultivars and those with a longer phenological cycle such as theSoracá cultivar. 2024-01-29T17:13:43Z 2024-01-29T17:13:43Z 2022-10-01 2022 Artículo científico http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 2500-5308 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38833 https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2512 reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia instname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA spa Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 23 3 1 20 Abderrahim, F., Huanatico, E., Segura, R., Arribas, S., Gonzalez, M. C., & Condezo-Hoyos, L. (2015). Physical features, phenolic compounds, betalains and total antioxidant capacity of coloured quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) from Peruvian Altiplano. Food Chemistry, 183, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.02 Ahmadi, S., Solgi, S., & Sepaskhah, A. (2019). Quinoa: A super or pseudo-super crop? Evidences from evapotranspiration, root growth, crop coefficients, and water productivity in a hot and semi-arid area under three planting densities. Agricultural Water Management, 225, 105784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105784 Alonso-Miravalle, L., & O’Mahony, J. (2018). Composition, protein profile and rheological properties of pseudocereal-based protein-rich ingredients. Foods, 7, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7050073 AOAC. (2016). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (20th ed.). AOAC International. Bazile, D., Jacobsen, S.-E., & Verniau, A. (2016b). The Global Expansion of Quinoa: Trends and Limits. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00622 Bazile, D., Pulvento, C., Verniau, A., Al-Nusairi, M. S., Ba, D., Breidy, J., Hassan, L., Mohammed, M., Mambetov, O., Otambekova, M., Sepahvand, N., Shams, A., Souici, D., Miri, K., & Padulosi, S. (2016a). Worldwide evaluations of quinoa: Preliminary results from post international year of quinoa FAO projects in nine countries. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00850 Delgado, A., Palacios, J., & Betancourt, C. (2009). Evaluación de 16 genotipos de quinua dulce (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en el municipio de Iles, Nariño (Colombia). Agronomía Colombiana, 27(2), 159-167. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/11125 Ekman, Á., Hayden, D., Dehesh, K., Bülow, L., & Stymne, S. (2008). Carbon partitioning between oil and carbohydrates in developing oat (Avena sativa L.) seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59(15), 4247-4257. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern266 Emendack, Y., Sanchez, J., Hayes, C., Nesbitt, M., Laza, H., & Burke, J. (2021). Seed-to-seed early-season cold resiliency in sorghum. Scientific reports, 11, 7801. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87450-1 Fghire, R., Anaya, F., Ali, O. I., Benlhabib, O., Ragab, R., & Wahbi, S. (2015). Physiological and photosynthetic response of quinoa to drought stress. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 75(2), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392015000200006 García-Parra, M., Stechauner-Rohringer, R., Garcia-Molano, J. F., & Ortiz-Gonzalez, D. (2020b). Analysis of the growth and morpho-physiological performance of three cultivars of Colombian quinoa grown under a greenhouse. Revista de Ciencias Agroveterinarias, 19(1), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711912020073 García-Parra, M., Zurita-Silva, A., Stechauner-Rohringer, R., Roa-Acosta, D., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2020a). Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and its relationship with agroclimatic characteristics: A Colombian perspective. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(2), 290-302. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392020000200290 Guerrero, P., Hurtado-Salazar, A., & Ceballos-Aguirre, N. (2017). Estudio técnico y económico de cuatro variedades de quinua en la región andina central de Colombia. Luna azul, 46(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2018.46.10 Hussain, M. I., Al-Dakheel, A. J., & Reigosa, M. J. (2018). Genotypic differences in agro-physiological, biochemical and isotopic responses to salinity stress in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants: Prospects for salinity tolerance and yield stability. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 129, 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.06.023 Issa-Ali, O., Fghire, R., Anaya, F., Benlhabib, O., & Wahbi, S. (2019). Physiological and morphological responses of two quinoa cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought stress. Gesunde Pflanzen, 71(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-019-00460-y Jayme-Oliveira, A., Ribeiro, W., Ramos, R., Ziviani, M., & Jakelaitis, G. (2017). Amaranth, quinoa, and millet growth and development under different water regimes in the Brazilian Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 52(8), 561-571. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2017000800001 Li, Y., He, N., Hou, J., Xu, L., Lui, C., Zhang, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, X., & Wu, X. (2018). Factors influencing leaf chlorophyll content in natural forests at the biome scale. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6(64), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00064 Melgarejo, L. M. (2010). Experimentos en fisiología vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Melo, D. (2016). Studio di adattabilità colturale della quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in italia settentrionale [dissertation, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Piacenza]. http://tesionline.unicatt.it/handle/10280/35878 Navruz-Varli, S., & Sanlier, N. (2016). Nutritional and health benefits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Cereal Science, 69, 371-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2016.05.004 Präger, A., Munz, S., Nkebiwe, P., Mast, B., & Graeff-Hönninger, S. (2018). Yield and quality characteristics of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars grown under field conditions in southwestern Germany. Agronomy, 8(10), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8100197 Rasouli, F., Kiani-Pouya, A., Tahir, A., Shabala, L., Chen, Z., & Shabala, S. (2021). A comparative analysis of stomatal traits and photosynthetic responses in closely related halophytic and glycophytic species under saline conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 181(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104300 Riccardi, M., Mele, G., Pulvento, C., Lavini, A., D’Andria, R., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2014). Non-destructive evaluation of chlorophyll content in quinoa and amaranth leaves by simple and multiple regression analysis of RGB image components. Photosynthesis Research, 120(3), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-014-9970-2 Roa-Acosta, D. F., Bravo-Gómez, J. E., García-Parra, M. A., Rodríguez-Herrera, R., & Solanilla-Duque, J. F. (2020). Hyper-protein quinoa flour (Chenopodium quinoa Willd): Monitoring and study of structural and rheological properties. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 121(108952), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108952 Ruiz, K. B., Biondi, S., Oses, R., Acuña-Rodríguez, I. S., Antognoni, F., Martinez-Mosqueira, E. A., Caulibaly, A., Canahua-Murillo, A., Pinto, M., Zurita-Silva, A., Bazile, D., Jacobsen, S-E., & Molina-Montenegro, M. A. (2014). Quinoa biodiversity and sustainability for food security under climate change. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(2), 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0195-0 Sakoda, K., Yamori, W., Shimada, T., Sugano, S., Hara-Nishimura, I., & Tanaka, Y. (2020). Higher Stomatal Density Improves Photosynthetic Induction and Biomass Production in Arabidopsis Under Fluctuating Light. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 589603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.589603 Sosa-Zuniga, V., Brito, V., Fuentes, F., & Steinfort, U. (2017). Phenological growth stages of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) based on the BBCH scale. Annals of Applied Biology, 171(1), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12358 Stikic, R., Glamoclija, D., Demin, M., Vucelic-Radovic, B., Jovanovic, Z., Milojkovic-Opsenica, D., & Milovanovic, M. (2012). Agronomical and nutritional evaluation of quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as an ingredient in bread formulations. Journal of Cereal Science, 55(2), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2011.10.010 Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2006). Fisiología vegetal. Ed. Universitat Jaume. Torres, J., Vargas, H., Corredor, G., & Reyes, L. (2000). Caracterización morfoagronómica de diecinueve cultivares de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en la sabana de Bogotá, Agronomía Colombiana, 17, 60-68. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/21547 Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf application/pdf Colombia Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA Mosquera (Colombia) Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria; Vol 23, Núm.3 (2022): Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria; p. 1-20. |