Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador

Banana and cooking banana (Musa spp.) production systems accumulate a considerable quantity of discard due to high quality demands of markets. Ripe fruits have high sugar contents, which can be easily processed to ethanol. The present study aimed to quantitatively assess the production potential of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graefe, Sophie, Dufour, D., Giraldo A., Muñoz, L.A., Mora P, Solís, H., Garcés, H., González, A.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/34981
_version_ 1855521521739497472
author Graefe, Sophie
Dufour, D.
Giraldo A.
Muñoz, L.A.
Mora P
Solís, H.
Garcés, H.
González, A.
author_browse Dufour, D.
Garcés, H.
Giraldo A.
González, A.
Graefe, Sophie
Mora P
Muñoz, L.A.
Solís, H.
author_facet Graefe, Sophie
Dufour, D.
Giraldo A.
Muñoz, L.A.
Mora P
Solís, H.
Garcés, H.
González, A.
author_sort Graefe, Sophie
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Banana and cooking banana (Musa spp.) production systems accumulate a considerable quantity of discard due to high quality demands of markets. Ripe fruits have high sugar contents, which can be easily processed to ethanol. The present study aimed to quantitatively assess the production potential of ethanol from Musa spp. discard and to analyze the energy and carbon (C) footprints of this production system using a life cycle approach. The study compared three case studies differing in management practices, which were (I) a coffee producer’s cooperative in Costa Rica using Musa spp. as shade trees, (II) organic banana producers from Ecuador, and (III) conventional banana producers from Ecuador. It was found that banana and cooking banana discard accumulated at a rate of 1.4–3.4 t ha−1, of which around 118–266 l ethanol could be produced on a yearly basis. The case study from Costa Rica yielded a net-energy balance (NEB) of 19.3 MJ l−1 and avoided carbon emissions of 0.48 kg l−1. It was closely followed by the organic banana producers from Ecuador with a NEB of 17.1 MJ l−1 and avoided carbon emissions of 0.44 kg l−1. NEB and avoided carbon emissions for the conventional banana farms in Ecuador were much lower (7.2 MJ l−1 and 0.34 kg l−1). Despite providing economic benefits to farmers through a biomass source that would have been otherwise lost, the study gave clear evidence that the ecological footprint of this ethanol production system is significantly influenced by the resource use during the production life cycle.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace34981
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2011
publishDateRange 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace349812024-08-27T10:35:31Z Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador Graefe, Sophie Dufour, D. Giraldo A. Muñoz, L.A. Mora P Solís, H. Garcés, H. González, A. agriculture climate carbon Banana and cooking banana (Musa spp.) production systems accumulate a considerable quantity of discard due to high quality demands of markets. Ripe fruits have high sugar contents, which can be easily processed to ethanol. The present study aimed to quantitatively assess the production potential of ethanol from Musa spp. discard and to analyze the energy and carbon (C) footprints of this production system using a life cycle approach. The study compared three case studies differing in management practices, which were (I) a coffee producer’s cooperative in Costa Rica using Musa spp. as shade trees, (II) organic banana producers from Ecuador, and (III) conventional banana producers from Ecuador. It was found that banana and cooking banana discard accumulated at a rate of 1.4–3.4 t ha−1, of which around 118–266 l ethanol could be produced on a yearly basis. The case study from Costa Rica yielded a net-energy balance (NEB) of 19.3 MJ l−1 and avoided carbon emissions of 0.48 kg l−1. It was closely followed by the organic banana producers from Ecuador with a NEB of 17.1 MJ l−1 and avoided carbon emissions of 0.44 kg l−1. NEB and avoided carbon emissions for the conventional banana farms in Ecuador were much lower (7.2 MJ l−1 and 0.34 kg l−1). Despite providing economic benefits to farmers through a biomass source that would have been otherwise lost, the study gave clear evidence that the ecological footprint of this ethanol production system is significantly influenced by the resource use during the production life cycle. 2011-07 2014-02-19T07:59:28Z 2014-02-19T07:59:28Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/34981 en Limited Access Elsevier Graefe S, Dufour D, Giraldo A, Muñoz LA, Mora P, Solís H, Garcés H, Gonzalez A. 2011. Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(7): 2640–2649.
spellingShingle agriculture
climate
carbon
Graefe, Sophie
Dufour, D.
Giraldo A.
Muñoz, L.A.
Mora P
Solís, H.
Garcés, H.
González, A.
Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador
title Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador
title_full Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador
title_fullStr Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador
title_short Energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard: A case study from Costa Rica and Ecuador
title_sort energy and carbon footprints of ethanol production using banana and cooking banana discard a case study from costa rica and ecuador
topic agriculture
climate
carbon
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/34981
work_keys_str_mv AT graefesophie energyandcarbonfootprintsofethanolproductionusingbananaandcookingbananadiscardacasestudyfromcostaricaandecuador
AT dufourd energyandcarbonfootprintsofethanolproductionusingbananaandcookingbananadiscardacasestudyfromcostaricaandecuador
AT giraldoa energyandcarbonfootprintsofethanolproductionusingbananaandcookingbananadiscardacasestudyfromcostaricaandecuador
AT munozla energyandcarbonfootprintsofethanolproductionusingbananaandcookingbananadiscardacasestudyfromcostaricaandecuador
AT morap energyandcarbonfootprintsofethanolproductionusingbananaandcookingbananadiscardacasestudyfromcostaricaandecuador
AT solish energyandcarbonfootprintsofethanolproductionusingbananaandcookingbananadiscardacasestudyfromcostaricaandecuador
AT garcesh energyandcarbonfootprintsofethanolproductionusingbananaandcookingbananadiscardacasestudyfromcostaricaandecuador
AT gonzaleza energyandcarbonfootprintsofethanolproductionusingbananaandcookingbananadiscardacasestudyfromcostaricaandecuador