Options for a national REDD+ architecture
Key criteria for assessing different institutional options are their overall legitimacy and ability to produce 3E+ outcomes. Four major options for channelling (international) REDD+ finance are projects, funds – independent or within the state administration – and budget support. The mix of these de...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20285 |
| Summary: | Key criteria for assessing different institutional options are their overall legitimacy and ability to produce 3E+ outcomes. Four major options for channelling (international) REDD+ finance are projects, funds – independent or within the state administration – and budget support. The mix of these depends crucially on national conditions and the choice of REDD+ actions. Building national REDD+ institutions takes time, and early design might constrain later options. Countries must therefore ensure that the immediate steps taken fit future and more developed solutions. |
|---|