Options for a national REDD+ architecture
Key criteria for assessing different institutional options are their overall legitimacy and ability to produce 3E+ outcomes. Four major options for channelling (international) REDD+ finance are projects, funds – independent or within the state administration – and budget support. The mix of these de...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20285 |
| Sumario: | Key criteria for assessing different institutional options are their overall legitimacy and ability to produce 3E+ outcomes. Four major options for channelling (international) REDD+ finance are projects, funds – independent or within the state administration – and budget support. The mix of these depends crucially on national conditions and the choice of REDD+ actions. Building national REDD+ institutions takes time, and early design might constrain later options. Countries must therefore ensure that the immediate steps taken fit future and more developed solutions. |
|---|