Options for a national REDD+ architecture
Key criteria for assessing different institutional options are their overall legitimacy and ability to produce 3E+ outcomes. Four major options for channelling (international) REDD+ finance are projects, funds – independent or within the state administration – and budget support. The mix of these de...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20285 |
| _version_ | 1855543638241574912 |
|---|---|
| author | Vatn, A. Angelsen, A. |
| author_browse | Angelsen, A. Vatn, A. |
| author_facet | Vatn, A. Angelsen, A. |
| author_sort | Vatn, A. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Key criteria for assessing different institutional options are their overall legitimacy and ability to produce 3E+ outcomes. Four major options for channelling (international) REDD+ finance are projects, funds – independent or within the state administration – and budget support. The mix of these depends crucially on national conditions and the choice of REDD+ actions. Building national REDD+ institutions takes time, and early design might constrain later options. Countries must therefore ensure that the immediate steps taken fit future and more developed solutions. |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace20285 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateRange | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Center for International Forestry Research |
| publisherStr | Center for International Forestry Research |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace202852025-01-24T14:21:07Z Options for a national REDD+ architecture Vatn, A. Angelsen, A. climate change governance Key criteria for assessing different institutional options are their overall legitimacy and ability to produce 3E+ outcomes. Four major options for channelling (international) REDD+ finance are projects, funds – independent or within the state administration – and budget support. The mix of these depends crucially on national conditions and the choice of REDD+ actions. Building national REDD+ institutions takes time, and early design might constrain later options. Countries must therefore ensure that the immediate steps taken fit future and more developed solutions. 2009 2012-06-04T09:13:13Z 2012-06-04T09:13:13Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20285 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Vatn, A., Angelsen, A. 2009. Options for a national REDD+ architecture . In: Angelsen, A. with Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds). Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. :57-74. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ISBN: 978-6-02-869303-5.. |
| spellingShingle | climate change governance Vatn, A. Angelsen, A. Options for a national REDD+ architecture |
| title | Options for a national REDD+ architecture |
| title_full | Options for a national REDD+ architecture |
| title_fullStr | Options for a national REDD+ architecture |
| title_full_unstemmed | Options for a national REDD+ architecture |
| title_short | Options for a national REDD+ architecture |
| title_sort | options for a national redd architecture |
| topic | climate change governance |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20285 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vatna optionsforanationalreddarchitecture AT angelsena optionsforanationalreddarchitecture |