Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada
Economists who analyze household decisionmaking allocation have traditionally assumed that the household acts as a single unit. They assume that there exists one decisionmaker whose preferences form the basis of household welfare and that all household resources are effectively pooled. This approach...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2003
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157500 |
| _version_ | 1855532554952638464 |
|---|---|
| author | Adam, Christopher Hoddinott, John F. Ligon, Ethan |
| author_browse | Adam, Christopher Hoddinott, John F. Ligon, Ethan |
| author_facet | Adam, Christopher Hoddinott, John F. Ligon, Ethan |
| author_sort | Adam, Christopher |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Economists who analyze household decisionmaking allocation have traditionally assumed that the household acts as a single unit. They assume that there exists one decisionmaker whose preferences form the basis of household welfare and that all household resources are effectively pooled. This approach is known as the “unitary model,” the “common preference model,” or the “joint family utility model,” depending on the study consulted. |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace157500 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publishDateRange | 2003 |
| publishDateSort | 2003 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1575002025-04-08T18:30:41Z Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada Adam, Christopher Hoddinott, John F. Ligon, Ethan property women gender developing countries economic theories household budget household consumption nutrition farming systems legal system policies education health empowerment agricultural technology agricultural growth child care property rights natural resources management agricultural policies technology transfer drought vegetables fisheries children Economists who analyze household decisionmaking allocation have traditionally assumed that the household acts as a single unit. They assume that there exists one decisionmaker whose preferences form the basis of household welfare and that all household resources are effectively pooled. This approach is known as the “unitary model,” the “common preference model,” or the “joint family utility model,” depending on the study consulted. 2003 2024-10-24T12:50:18Z 2024-10-24T12:50:18Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157500 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Adam, Christopher; Hoddinott, John; and Ligon, Ethan. 2003. Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada. In Household decisions, gender, and development: a synthesis of recent research. Quisumbing, Agnes R., ed. Chapter 5. Pp. 37-40. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157500 |
| spellingShingle | property women gender developing countries economic theories household budget household consumption nutrition farming systems legal system policies education health empowerment agricultural technology agricultural growth child care property rights natural resources management agricultural policies technology transfer drought vegetables fisheries children Adam, Christopher Hoddinott, John F. Ligon, Ethan Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada |
| title | Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada |
| title_full | Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada |
| title_fullStr | Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada |
| title_short | Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada |
| title_sort | dynamic intrahousehold bargaining matrimonial property law and suicide in canada |
| topic | property women gender developing countries economic theories household budget household consumption nutrition farming systems legal system policies education health empowerment agricultural technology agricultural growth child care property rights natural resources management agricultural policies technology transfer drought vegetables fisheries children |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157500 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT adamchristopher dynamicintrahouseholdbargainingmatrimonialpropertylawandsuicideincanada AT hoddinottjohnf dynamicintrahouseholdbargainingmatrimonialpropertylawandsuicideincanada AT ligonethan dynamicintrahouseholdbargainingmatrimonialpropertylawandsuicideincanada |