Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment

The right to safe food is enshrined in the Kenyan constitution. Through their jurisdiction over matters of agriculture – specifically crop and animal husbandry, abattoirs, and veterinary services – and health, including the licensing and control of undertakings that sell food to the public, county g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Vivian, Baral, Siddhartha
Formato: Brief
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147040
_version_ 1855513036034408448
author Hoffmann, Vivian
Baral, Siddhartha
author_browse Baral, Siddhartha
Hoffmann, Vivian
author_facet Hoffmann, Vivian
Baral, Siddhartha
author_sort Hoffmann, Vivian
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The right to safe food is enshrined in the Kenyan constitution. Through their jurisdiction over matters of agriculture – specifically crop and animal husbandry, abattoirs, and veterinary services – and health, including the licensing and control of undertakings that sell food to the public, county governments in Kenya have a critical role to play in meeting this obligation to their citizens. Food safety has ‘public good’ characteristics and requires sufficient public investment. Appropriate budgetary allocation for food safety investments, requires that county governments understand the current costs of foodborne disease (FBD), as well as the gains they could achieve through improved public capacity to manage food safety risks. However, due to limited availability of data attributing ill-health to specific causes, as well as general under-reporting of health complaints to medical systems, estimates of the health and economic costs of foodborne disease (FBD) in Kenya exist only at the national level. In the context of devolution, the lack of county-specific estimates constitutes a barrier to effective policy-making regarding the control of FBD. In this study, we combine recent national estimates of the health burden attributable to FBD from the World Health Organization (WHO) with county-level data on diarrhea rates to estimate the health and economic burdens of FBD for Murang’a, Laikipia, Nakuru, Nyandarua, and Nairobi counties.
format Brief
id CGSpace147040
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1470402025-11-06T05:00:26Z Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment Hoffmann, Vivian Baral, Siddhartha foodborne diseases costs public investment health child health diarrhoea food safety The right to safe food is enshrined in the Kenyan constitution. Through their jurisdiction over matters of agriculture – specifically crop and animal husbandry, abattoirs, and veterinary services – and health, including the licensing and control of undertakings that sell food to the public, county governments in Kenya have a critical role to play in meeting this obligation to their citizens. Food safety has ‘public good’ characteristics and requires sufficient public investment. Appropriate budgetary allocation for food safety investments, requires that county governments understand the current costs of foodborne disease (FBD), as well as the gains they could achieve through improved public capacity to manage food safety risks. However, due to limited availability of data attributing ill-health to specific causes, as well as general under-reporting of health complaints to medical systems, estimates of the health and economic costs of foodborne disease (FBD) in Kenya exist only at the national level. In the context of devolution, the lack of county-specific estimates constitutes a barrier to effective policy-making regarding the control of FBD. In this study, we combine recent national estimates of the health burden attributable to FBD from the World Health Organization (WHO) with county-level data on diarrhea rates to estimate the health and economic burdens of FBD for Murang’a, Laikipia, Nakuru, Nyandarua, and Nairobi counties. 2019-12-17 2024-06-21T09:10:44Z 2024-06-21T09:10:44Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147040 en https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147240 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Hoffmann, Vivian; and Baral, Siddhartha. 2019. Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment. Project Note. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147040
spellingShingle foodborne diseases
costs
public investment
health
child health
diarrhoea
food safety
Hoffmann, Vivian
Baral, Siddhartha
Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment
title Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment
title_full Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment
title_fullStr Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment
title_full_unstemmed Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment
title_short Foodborne disease in Kenya: County-level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment
title_sort foodborne disease in kenya county level cost estimates and the case for greater public investment
topic foodborne diseases
costs
public investment
health
child health
diarrhoea
food safety
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147040
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannvivian foodbornediseaseinkenyacountylevelcostestimatesandthecaseforgreaterpublicinvestment
AT baralsiddhartha foodbornediseaseinkenyacountylevelcostestimatesandthecaseforgreaterpublicinvestment