Choice of tree species in the aftermath of two major storms : a qualitative study of private forest owners in southern Sweden
The forests in Götaland, the most southern part of Sweden, are dominated by Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst). This species is very important for the Swedish forest sector, but also associated with certain risks, such as wind-throw. Götaland was hit by the storm Gudrun in 2005, causing da...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | H2 |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés sueco |
| Publicado: |
SLU/Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre
2016
|
| Materias: |
| Sumario: | The forests in Götaland, the most southern part of Sweden, are dominated by Norway spruce (Picea
abies (L.) H. Karst). This species is very important for the Swedish forest sector, but also associated
with certain risks, such as wind-throw. Götaland was hit by the storm Gudrun in 2005, causing
damages of a magnitude never experienced in the modern Swedish history. Two years later the same
region suffered severe damages in another storm, Per. Due to the ownership structure in southern
Sweden the reforestation efforts after the storms were largely made by small-scale private forest
owners. Disproportionally high losses of Norway spruce exposed the risks associated with previous
practices. In addition, reforestation grants were available through the Swedish Forest Agency that
compensated for the higher regeneration costs associated with broadleaves. Despite this, the vast
majority of the storm felled areas were regenerated with Norway spruce. Through qualitative
interviews and subsequent analysis, this study examined how small-scale private forest owners’
reasoned in their choice of species and which factors that were of decisive importance for the final
outcome. Regeneration with Norway spruce was mainly an expression of forest owners evaluating
the different alternatives based on economic rationality. Past and current economic conditions have
been and still are favorable for this species, and forest owners therefore relayed on experiencebased
knowledge in their reforestation decision. Meanwhile, there are other contextual factors that
steered forest owners towards planting spruce, such as a high browsing pressure and influence from
dominant forest management norms. Regeneration with other species reflects situations where
forest owners incorporated other aspects in their decision-making processes. Regeneration with
broadleaves was favored by consideration of aesthetical values and an awareness of potential future
risks with Norway spruce. In addition, since large areas had to be regenerated, forest owners ceased
the opportunity to vent their curiosity with new species (especially exotic conifers/broadleaves) on
smaller areas. The soft policy instruments that characterize Swedish forest policy also had a
facilitating effect. Forest owners received information about alternatives through various pathways
and the reforestation grants were of crucial importance for the owners that planted broadleaves.
This study also suggests that the higher share of naturally regenerated birch found in regenerations
surveys after Gudrun cannot simply be regarded as an effect of lower level of ambition, but also
expresses a shift towards a more positive attitude concerning this species. |
|---|