När religion och djurskydd kolliderar

The fact that animals have feelings is something that is commonly agreed. Many authors show how animals' views of their environment is quite similar with human views. Animals, which are slaughtered without prior stunning, find the moment of slaughter unpleasant and stressing. This is shown in numero...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lundvall, Anna
Formato: First cycle, G2E
Lenguaje:sueco
sueco
Publicado: 2009
Acceso en línea:https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/366/
_version_ 1855570178466643968
author Lundvall, Anna
author_browse Lundvall, Anna
author_facet Lundvall, Anna
author_sort Lundvall, Anna
collection Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
description The fact that animals have feelings is something that is commonly agreed. Many authors show how animals' views of their environment is quite similar with human views. Animals, which are slaughtered without prior stunning, find the moment of slaughter unpleasant and stressing. This is shown in numerous of scientific studies. The cognitive ability of animals can be compared to how they experience feelings and scientists have shown how the structures in the brain that involves feelings and cognitive behaviours in animals are very much the same as the structures in human brains. Because of this, some scientists consider that behaviour in animals can be directly interpreted into human feelings. Halal- and kosher slaughter comes from traditions. These traditions come from interpretations of religious texts. The texts were written in a time when there was little knowledge of animal welfare and food hygiene. What the texts are saying is that animals should be treated with respect and that they should not suffer. Some animals are, according to the texts, not clean and should therefore not be consumed. This also applies for some parts of the animals' body. If an animal somehow is injured, the meat can not be eaten according to the religious texts. This causes trouble, when in modern times; animals are stunned prior to slaughter. For some religious groups, stunning is concerned to be an injury and the meat can therefore not be consumed. In Sweden it is not allowed to slaughter animals without prior stunning. The European laws say the same, but there is a possibility to slaughter animals without prior stunning for religious purposes. According to sources in the EU more and more animals are slaughtered without prior stunning. This is because it is easier to have one way to produce instead of two. The meat that is not sold to the religious groups is in some cases sold as "regular" meat. I have not been able to get answers to the questions if the Swedish food chains sell meat of this kind or not. But I have hopefully awoken an interest in the question and I am hoping, thorough this, that they make considerable research in where the meat comes from and how the animals are treated at slaughter.
format First cycle, G2E
id RepoSLU366
institution Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
language swe
swe
publishDate 2009
publishDateSort 2009
record_format eprints
spelling RepoSLU3662012-04-20T14:09:13Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/366/ När religion och djurskydd kolliderar Lundvall, Anna The fact that animals have feelings is something that is commonly agreed. Many authors show how animals' views of their environment is quite similar with human views. Animals, which are slaughtered without prior stunning, find the moment of slaughter unpleasant and stressing. This is shown in numerous of scientific studies. The cognitive ability of animals can be compared to how they experience feelings and scientists have shown how the structures in the brain that involves feelings and cognitive behaviours in animals are very much the same as the structures in human brains. Because of this, some scientists consider that behaviour in animals can be directly interpreted into human feelings. Halal- and kosher slaughter comes from traditions. These traditions come from interpretations of religious texts. The texts were written in a time when there was little knowledge of animal welfare and food hygiene. What the texts are saying is that animals should be treated with respect and that they should not suffer. Some animals are, according to the texts, not clean and should therefore not be consumed. This also applies for some parts of the animals' body. If an animal somehow is injured, the meat can not be eaten according to the religious texts. This causes trouble, when in modern times; animals are stunned prior to slaughter. For some religious groups, stunning is concerned to be an injury and the meat can therefore not be consumed. In Sweden it is not allowed to slaughter animals without prior stunning. The European laws say the same, but there is a possibility to slaughter animals without prior stunning for religious purposes. According to sources in the EU more and more animals are slaughtered without prior stunning. This is because it is easier to have one way to produce instead of two. The meat that is not sold to the religious groups is in some cases sold as "regular" meat. I have not been able to get answers to the questions if the Swedish food chains sell meat of this kind or not. But I have hopefully awoken an interest in the question and I am hoping, thorough this, that they make considerable research in where the meat comes from and how the animals are treated at slaughter. 2009-07-07 First cycle, G2E NonPeerReviewed application/pdf swe https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/366/1/lundvall_a_090707.pdf Lundvall, Anna, 2009. När religion och djurskydd kolliderar : slakt utan bedövning. First cycle, G2E. Skara: (VH) > Dept. of Animal Environment and Health (until 231231) <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-880.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-3-11 swe
spellingShingle Lundvall, Anna
När religion och djurskydd kolliderar
title När religion och djurskydd kolliderar
title_full När religion och djurskydd kolliderar
title_fullStr När religion och djurskydd kolliderar
title_full_unstemmed När religion och djurskydd kolliderar
title_short När religion och djurskydd kolliderar
title_sort när religion och djurskydd kolliderar
url https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/366/
https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/366/