Agronomic and economic responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in Nariño, Colombia

Due to the importance of potato cultivation in Nariño, Colombia and the high participation of fertilizer in production costs (25%), as well as the great variability of soils in the region, we evaluated three fertilizer levels for six cultivars of Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena in four homogeneous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcillo Paguay, Carlos Alberto, Benavides Cardona, Carlos Andrés, Ramos Zambrano, Housseman Steven, Romero, Juan Vicente
Format: article
Language:Español
Published: Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia - UPTC 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38791
https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i2.13559
id RepoAGROSAVIA38791
record_format dspace
institution Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria
collection Repositorio AGROSAVIA
language Español
topic Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento - F30
Solanum tuberosum
Aplicación de abonos
Andosoles
Nutrición de las plantas
Raíces y tubérculos
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7221
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10795
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_404
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16379
spellingShingle Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento - F30
Solanum tuberosum
Aplicación de abonos
Andosoles
Nutrición de las plantas
Raíces y tubérculos
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7221
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10795
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_404
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16379
Marcillo Paguay, Carlos Alberto
Benavides Cardona, Carlos Andrés
Ramos Zambrano, Housseman Steven
Romero, Juan Vicente
Agronomic and economic responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in Nariño, Colombia
description Due to the importance of potato cultivation in Nariño, Colombia and the high participation of fertilizer in production costs (25%), as well as the great variability of soils in the region, we evaluated three fertilizer levels for six cultivars of Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena in four homogeneous production environments. We recorded physiology and yield of the potatoes in experimental plots in a randomized complete block design with three replications in each environment. Analysis of variance, comparison of means for yield components, and discriminant analysis of principal components were performed for all variables. For the economic analysis we used the partial budget net benefit methodology. The environments generated differential responses in the cultivars. Between fertilization levels there were significant differences; however, there was no interaction between levels and environments. The cultivars ‘ICA Única’, ‘Pastusa Suprema’, ‘Parda Bilingüe’, and ‘Roja Huila’, showed the highest yields with the application of 262, 600, and 538 kg ha-1 of N, P2O5, and K2O (level L3). ‘Diacol Capiro’ and ‘Superior’ did not show yield differences between levels. Economically, the alternative that would generate the highest return on investment was fertilization with level L2 (N 180, P2O5 400, K2O 358 kg ha-1) in ‘Diacol Capiro’, ‘Superior’, and ‘ICA Única’ cultivars. For ‘Roja Huila’ and ‘Parda Bilingüe’ the highest return was level L1 (N 150, P2O5 200, K2O 100 kg ha-1). In the case of ‘Pastusa Suprema’ the marginal rate of return was 18.5% with the L2 fertilization level.
format article
author Marcillo Paguay, Carlos Alberto
Benavides Cardona, Carlos Andrés
Ramos Zambrano, Housseman Steven
Romero, Juan Vicente
author_facet Marcillo Paguay, Carlos Alberto
Benavides Cardona, Carlos Andrés
Ramos Zambrano, Housseman Steven
Romero, Juan Vicente
author_sort Marcillo Paguay, Carlos Alberto
title Agronomic and economic responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in Nariño, Colombia
title_short Agronomic and economic responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in Nariño, Colombia
title_full Agronomic and economic responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in Nariño, Colombia
title_fullStr Agronomic and economic responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in Nariño, Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Agronomic and economic responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in Nariño, Colombia
title_sort agronomic and economic responses of the potato (solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in nariño, colombia
publisher Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia - UPTC
publishDate 2024
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38791
https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i2.13559
work_keys_str_mv AT marcillopaguaycarlosalberto agronomicandeconomicresponsesofthepotatosolanumtuberosumsubspandigenatodifferentialfertilizationinfourenvironmentsinnarinocolombia
AT benavidescardonacarlosandres agronomicandeconomicresponsesofthepotatosolanumtuberosumsubspandigenatodifferentialfertilizationinfourenvironmentsinnarinocolombia
AT ramoszambranohoussemansteven agronomicandeconomicresponsesofthepotatosolanumtuberosumsubspandigenatodifferentialfertilizationinfourenvironmentsinnarinocolombia
AT romerojuanvicente agronomicandeconomicresponsesofthepotatosolanumtuberosumsubspandigenatodifferentialfertilizationinfourenvironmentsinnarinocolombia
AT marcillopaguaycarlosalberto respuestaagronomicayeconomicadepapasolanumtuberosumsubspandigenaalafertilizaciondiferencialencuatroambientesdenarinocolombia
AT benavidescardonacarlosandres respuestaagronomicayeconomicadepapasolanumtuberosumsubspandigenaalafertilizaciondiferencialencuatroambientesdenarinocolombia
AT ramoszambranohoussemansteven respuestaagronomicayeconomicadepapasolanumtuberosumsubspandigenaalafertilizaciondiferencialencuatroambientesdenarinocolombia
AT romerojuanvicente respuestaagronomicayeconomicadepapasolanumtuberosumsubspandigenaalafertilizaciondiferencialencuatroambientesdenarinocolombia
_version_ 1808106614318694400
spelling RepoAGROSAVIA387912024-01-20T03:01:17Z Agronomic and economic responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to differential fertilization in four environments in Nariño, Colombia Respuesta agronómica y económica de papa (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) a la fertilización diferencial en cuatro ambientes de Nariño, Colombia Marcillo Paguay, Carlos Alberto Benavides Cardona, Carlos Andrés Ramos Zambrano, Housseman Steven Romero, Juan Vicente Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento - F30 Solanum tuberosum Aplicación de abonos Andosoles Nutrición de las plantas Raíces y tubérculos http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7221 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10795 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_404 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16379 Due to the importance of potato cultivation in Nariño, Colombia and the high participation of fertilizer in production costs (25%), as well as the great variability of soils in the region, we evaluated three fertilizer levels for six cultivars of Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena in four homogeneous production environments. We recorded physiology and yield of the potatoes in experimental plots in a randomized complete block design with three replications in each environment. Analysis of variance, comparison of means for yield components, and discriminant analysis of principal components were performed for all variables. For the economic analysis we used the partial budget net benefit methodology. The environments generated differential responses in the cultivars. Between fertilization levels there were significant differences; however, there was no interaction between levels and environments. The cultivars ‘ICA Única’, ‘Pastusa Suprema’, ‘Parda Bilingüe’, and ‘Roja Huila’, showed the highest yields with the application of 262, 600, and 538 kg ha-1 of N, P2O5, and K2O (level L3). ‘Diacol Capiro’ and ‘Superior’ did not show yield differences between levels. Economically, the alternative that would generate the highest return on investment was fertilization with level L2 (N 180, P2O5 400, K2O 358 kg ha-1) in ‘Diacol Capiro’, ‘Superior’, and ‘ICA Única’ cultivars. For ‘Roja Huila’ and ‘Parda Bilingüe’ the highest return was level L1 (N 150, P2O5 200, K2O 100 kg ha-1). In the case of ‘Pastusa Suprema’ the marginal rate of return was 18.5% with the L2 fertilization level. Papa-Solanum tuberosum 2024-01-19T17:58:41Z 2024-01-19T17:58:41Z 2022-05-03 2022 article Artículo científico http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 info:eu-repo/semantics/article https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 2422-3719 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38791 https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i2.13559 reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia instname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA spa Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas 16 2 1 11 Avendaño Gómez, E. and W. González Santos. 2015. Evaluación financiera del sistema de producción de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) en Oicatá, Boyacá. Cienc. Agric. 12(2), 31-41. Doi: https://doi. org/10.19053/01228420.4351 BANREP, Banco de la República - Colombia. 2020. Tasa de captación semanal y mensual. https://www.banrep.gov.co/es/estadisticas/tasas-captacion-semanales-y-mensuales; consulted: October, 2021. BANREP, Banco de la República - Colombia. 2021. Informe de política monetaria. Issue 01. Bogota. Benavides Cardona, C.A., C.A. Marcillo Paguay, E. Martínez Pachón, D.A. Calvache Muñoz, S.N. Yandar Erazo, L.F. Gómez Gil, and S.C. Insuasty Córdoba. 2021. Caracterización geográfica y tecnologías locales de producción asociadas al sistema productivo papa en el departamento de Nariño. pp. 53-91. In: Martínez Pachón, E., S.C. Insuasty Córdoba, C.A. Benavides Cardona, L.F. Gómez Gil, and P. Uribe Mejía (Comp.). Caracterización de los sistemas productivos de papa en Nariño 2015-2020: conocimiento para la toma de decisiones. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia), Mosquera, Colombia. Borrego, F., J.M. Fernández, A. López, V.M. Parga, M. Murillo, and A. Carvajal. 2000. Análisis de crecimiento en siete variedades de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.). Agron. Mesoam. 11(1), 145-149. Doi: https://doi. org/10.15517/AM.V11I1.17364 Bravo Realpe, I., E. Campo, and C.A. Arboleda. 2016. Alófanos causa de indisponibilidad de aniones en suelos del departamento del Cauca – Colombia. Suelos Ecuat. 46(1/2), 13-30. CIMMYT, Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo. 1988. Formulación de recomendaciones a partir de datos agronómicos: Un manual metodológico de evaluación económica. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF Colombia Fedepapa, Federación Colombiana de Productores de Papa. 2021. Boletín Regional Nariño. Vol. 5. Bogota. Colombia ICA, Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. 1992. Fertilización en diversos cultivos: quinta aproximación. Bogota. Colombia ICONTEC, Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación. 1996. NTC 341: industria alimentaria, papa para el consumo, clasificación. Bogota. Colombia Gobernación de Nariño. 2020. Plan departamental de extensión agropecuaria del departamento de Nariño 2020-2023. San Juan de Pasto, Colombia. Colombia MADR, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. 2021. Cadena de la papa. Indicadores e instrumentos. Junio 2021. In: https://sioc.minagricultura. gov.co/Papa/Documentos/2021-06-30%20Cifras%20 Sectoriales.pdf; consulted: October, 2021. Corficolombiana. 2020. Rentabilidad esperada del capital propio (Ke). Cómo evaluar la eficiencia del mercadeo con el costo de capital. https://investigaciones.corficolombiana.com/documents/38211/0/20201123b%20 -%20Rentabilidad%20del%20capital%20propio.pdf/ e4211ef8-b113-9634-6870-e426a081be1b; consulted: October, 2021. Esprella, R., P. Flores, and J. García. 2012. Guía práctica para producir nuestra semilla de papa de calidad: Guía para agricultores/ agricultoras y técnicos. Centro Internacional de la Papa, La Paz. Fernandes, A.M. and R.P. Soratto. 2016. Phosphorus fertilizer rate for fresh market potato cultivars grown in tropical soil with low phosphorus availability. Am. J. Potato Res. 93, 404-414. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12230-016-9515-7 Ferreira, E.B., P.P. Cavalcanti, and D.A. Nogueira. 2013. ExpDes: Experimental designs package. R package v 1.1.2. In: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ExpDes/index.html; consulted: October, 2021. García Realpe, B. and L. Obando Guerrero. 1993. Fertilización del cultivo de papa en sistemas de producción en finca, departamento de Nariño. Rev. Cienc. Agric. 12(1), 21-31. García, B. and C. Pantoja. 1998. Fertilización del cultivo de la papa en el departamento de Nariño. pp. 7-27. In: Guerrero, R. (ed.). Fertilización de cultivos en clima frío. 2nd ed. Monómeros Colombo Venezolanos, Bogota. Henriquez, C., E. Bornemisza, and F. Bertsch. 1994. Fijación de potasio en vertisoles, inceptisoles, andisoles y ultisoles de Costa Rica. Agron. Costarr. 18(2), 133-140 Hunt, R. 1978. Plant growth analysis. Edward Arnold Publishers, London. Jerez Mompie, E.I., R. Martín Martín, D. Morales Guevara, and Y. Díaz Hernández. 2016. Análisis clásico del crecimiento en tres variedades de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.). Cult. Trop. 37(2), 79-87. Doi: https://doi. org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4860.0568 Jombart, T. 2008. Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24(11), 1403-1405. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ bioinformatics/btn129 Koch, M., M. Naumann, E. Pawelzik, A. Gransee, and H. Thiel. 2020. The importance of nutrient management for potato production Part I: Plant nutrition and yield. Potato Res. 63, 97-119. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11540-019-09431-2 Marcillo Paguay, C.A., C.A. Benavides Cardona, C. Guatusmal Gelpud, S.N. Yandar Erazo, and J.V. Romero. 2021. Zona papera nariñense: una mirada a los ambientes productivos. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia), Mosquera, Colombia. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21930/agrosavia. nbook.7404777 Mohamed, E.M.E., M. Watthier, J.C. Zanuncio, and R.H.S. Santos. 2017. Dry matter accumulation and potato productivity with green manure. IDESIA 35(1), 79-86. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-34292017005000016 Monsalve, O.I., E.M. Espitia, and M.M Bolaños-Benavides. 2020. Split fertilization as a strategy to reduce the amount of fertilizer applied in potato crops form Colombia. Case of study. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 14(2), 240-248. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/ rcch.2020v14i2.10523 Mora-Aguilar, R., J. Ortiz-Cereceres, A. Rivera-Peña, M.C. Mendoza-Castillo, M.T. Colinas-León, and H. Lozoya- Saldaña. 2006. Índices de eficiencia de genotipos de papa establecidos en condiciones de secano. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 12(1), 85-94. Doi: https://doi. org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2004.09.049 Morales-Hernández, J.L., S. Rebollar-Rebollar, J. Hernández- Martínez, and F.J. González-Raz. 2015. Determinación del óptimo técnico y económico en el cultivo de papa de temporal. Paradigma económico. Revista de Economía Regional y Sectorial 7(1), 87-106. Moreno, J. 2000. Variedades de papa cultivadas en Colombia. pp. 51-70. In: Herrera Heredia, C.A., L.H. Fierro Guzmán, and J.D. Moreno Mendoza (Comps.). Manejo integrado del cultivo de la papa. Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia), Mosquera, Colombia. Ñústez, C. 2011. Variedades colombianas de papa. Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota. Pandey, R., V. Paul, M. Das, M. Meena, and R. Meena. 2017. Plant growth analysis. pp. 103-107. In: Paul, V., R. Pandey, and M. Pal (eds.). Manual of ICAR sponsored training programme on “Physiological Techniques to Analyze the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Plants”. IARI, New Delhi. Doi: https://doi. org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21657.72808 Pinochet, D., J. Clunes, C. Gauna, and A. Contreras. 2018. Reasoned fertilization of potato in response to nitrogen supply in Andisols. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 18(3), 790-803. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-95162018005002301 R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Reyes Hernández, M. 2001. Análisis económico de experimentos agrícolas con presupuestos parciales: Re-enseñando el uso de este enfoque. Boletín 1. Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala – Centro de Información Agrosocioeconómica, Guatemala. Rios Quinchoa, J.Y., S.C. Jaramillo Villegas, L.H. González Santamaría, and J.M. Cotes Torres. 2010. Determinación del efecto de diferentes niveles de fertilización en papa (Solanum tuberosum ssp. Andigena) DIACOL Capiro en un suelo con propiedades Ándicas de Santa Rosa de Osos, Colombia. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellin 63(1), 5225-5237. Sánchez Espinosa, J.A. and Y. Rubiano Sanabria. 2015. Procesos específicos de formación en Andisoles, Alfisoles y Ultisoles en Colombia. Revista EIA Esc. Ing. Antioq. 12(2), 85-97. Santos Castellanos, C., M. Segura Abril, and C.E. Ñústez López. 2010. Relación fuente – demanda de cuatro variedades de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) en el municipio de Zipaquirá (Cundinamarca, Colombia). Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellin 63(1), 5253-5266. Tinjacá Ruiz, S. and L.E. Rodríguez Molano. 2015. Catálogo de papas nativas de Nariño, Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota. Wassihun, A.N., T.D. Koye, and A.D. Koye. 2019. Analysis of technical efficiency of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production in Chilga District, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. J. Econ. Struct. 8(1), 34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-019-0166-y Zelelew, D.Z., S. Lal, T.T. Kidane, and B.M. Ghebreslassie. 2016. Effect of potassium levels on growth and productivity of potato varieties. Am. J. Plant Sci. 7(12), 1629- 1638. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2016.712154 AGRONOMIC AND ECONOMIC RESPONSES OF POTATOES TO FERTILIZATION IN NARIÑO, COLOMBIA 11 Vol. 16 Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf application/pdf Nariño Colombia Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia - UPTC Bogotá (Colombia) Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas.; Vol. 16, Núm. 2 (2022): Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas (Mayo);p. 2 -11.