Imagen de Portada
Código QR

Preprints are good for science and good for the public

We disagree with Tom Sheldon’s contention that the preprint ecosystem can present a challenge to accurate and timely journalism (Nature 559, 445; 2018). Restricting when or how preprints are released risks suppressing science communication without any clear advantage to the public. When scientist...

Descripción completa

Autores principales: Sarabipour, Sarvenaz, Wissink, Erin M., Burgess, Steven J., Hensel, Zach, Debat, Humberto Julio, Emmott, Edward, Akay, Alper, Akdemir, Kadir C., Schwessinger, Benjamin
Formato: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Nature Research 2020
Materias:
Publicaciones
Publications
Preprints
Embargo
Artículos
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8428
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06054-4
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06054-4
Sumario:We disagree with Tom Sheldon’s contention that the preprint ecosystem can present a challenge to accurate and timely journalism (Nature 559, 445; 2018). Restricting when or how preprints are released risks suppressing science communication without any clear advantage to the public. When scientists and journalists follow fundamental principles for reporting.

Ejemplares similares