Preprints are good for science and good for the public
We disagree with Tom Sheldon’s contention that the preprint ecosystem can present a challenge to accurate and timely journalism (Nature 559, 445; 2018). Restricting when or how preprints are released risks suppressing science communication without any clear advantage to the public. When scientist...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Nature Research
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8428 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06054-4 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06054-4 |
Ejemplares similares: Preprints are good for science and good for the public
- On the value of preprints: an early career researcher perspective
- Conferencia-taller internacional calidad, coherencia y competitividad de la educación agrícola en un mundo cambiante, CIEA-1997
- Do entrance fees crowd out donations for public goods? Evidence from a protected area in Costa Rica
- Primary classification in the orchidaceae
- Empowering women in science a good practice guide = Empoderando a las mujeres en ciencia: una guía de buenas prácticas
- Argentina: publicly funded science under threat