Preprints are good for science and good for the public
We disagree with Tom Sheldon’s contention that the preprint ecosystem can present a challenge to accurate and timely journalism (Nature 559, 445; 2018). Restricting when or how preprints are released risks suppressing science communication without any clear advantage to the public. When scientist...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Nature Research
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8428 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06054-4 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06054-4 |
Ejemplares similares: Preprints are good for science and good for the public
- On the value of preprints: an early career researcher perspective
- Conferencia-taller internacional calidad, coherencia y competitividad de la educación agrícola en un mundo cambiante, CIEA-1997
- Reporte de artículos científicos publicados (2019 – 2023) en el Repositorio Institucional
- The removal of trade sanctions’ impact on South African wine export : a gravity model that estimates what happened with South Africa’s wine export when apartheid ended.
- Primary classification in the orchidaceae
- Assessment of Russian embargo impact on economies of the EU countries : an input-output approach