Differences in the virulence of two strains of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotype A with the same spatiotemporal distribution
During the 2000–2001 epidemic of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) in Argentina, two FMDV serotype A viruses were identified among others. Since different pathogenic properties between these virus strains were noticed in cattle, we evaluated several biological properties and features of FMDV A/Arg...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168170209003864 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2009.10.013 |
| Sumario: | During the 2000–2001 epidemic of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) in Argentina, two FMDV serotype A viruses were identified among others. Since different pathogenic properties between these virus strains were noticed in cattle, we evaluated several biological properties and features of FMDV A/Arg/00 and FMDV A/Arg/01 in order to compare these viruses in terms of virulence and pathogenicity. Our results indicate that FMDV A/Arg/00 grows less efficiently than FMDV A/Arg/01, exemplified by smaller sized plaques, retarded one-step growth curves and overall low viral yields. Also, FMDV A/Arg/00 displayed the lowest specific infectivity in suckling mice requiring 50-fold more infectious particles than FMDV A/Arg/01 to generate a LD50 in suckling mice. Finally, FMDV A/Arg/00 did not cause death in adult C57Bl/6 mice even at high doses (107–106 PFU) whereas FMDV A/Arg/01 resulted lethal in doses as low as 102 PFU. Overall, we were able to demonstrate that these virus strains differ from each other in terms of virulence and pathogenicity. |
|---|