Misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays

Trabajo presentado al International Symposium on Foliar Nutrition of Perennial Fruit Plants, Merano (Italia), 2001

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanchez, Enrique Eduardo, Righetti, Timothy L.
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: ISHS 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23812
https://www.actahort.org/books/594/594_45.htm
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.594.45
_version_ 1855487148514344960
author Sanchez, Enrique Eduardo
Righetti, Timothy L.
author_browse Righetti, Timothy L.
Sanchez, Enrique Eduardo
author_facet Sanchez, Enrique Eduardo
Righetti, Timothy L.
author_sort Sanchez, Enrique Eduardo
collection INTA Digital
description Trabajo presentado al International Symposium on Foliar Nutrition of Perennial Fruit Plants, Merano (Italia), 2001
format Artículo
id INTA23812
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher ISHS
publisherStr ISHS
record_format dspace
spelling INTA238122025-09-15T14:35:36Z Misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays Sanchez, Enrique Eduardo Righetti, Timothy L. Pyrus communis Malus domestica Frutas de Pepita Nutrición de las Plantas Pome Fruits Plant Nutrition Apples Pears Trace Elements Manzana Pera Oligoelementos Mineral Nutrition Micronutrients Nutrición Mineral Micronutrientes Trabajo presentado al International Symposium on Foliar Nutrition of Perennial Fruit Plants, Merano (Italia), 2001 Many researchers and field managers consider Zn the most limiting micronutrient for tree fruit production. A threshold concentration of 18-20 ppm in summer shoot leaves is considered adequate in most world fruit growing regions. In a foliar analysis survey of high yielding pear orchards, the mid summer Zn concentrations varied from 12 to 16 ppm. This suggests that either current threshold values for shoot leaves are inappropriately high (less Zn is required) or that mid summer leaf samples do not adequately reflect the Zn status of the tree. In addition to the problems associated with the interpretation of leaf analyses, considerable confusion exists about the most effective timing for Zn sprays. Zinc is recognized as an immobile nutrient. This suggests that movement of Zn from sprayed leaves to storage tissues in the fall and remobilization into new growth in the spring is unlikely. However, some fertilizer guides recommend post harvest fall sprays to alleviate Zn deficiencies. Dormant Zn sprays are also recommended. In a series of experiments carried out using both unlabelled Zn and the stable isotope Zn68, it was demonstrated that neither dormant nor fall applications contribute significantly to the Zn content of newly developing tissues in the spring. Therefore, these application practices are inappropriate. A spring Zn spray clearly affects the contacted leaves, even though very little moves from the sprayed leaves to new organs. Spring applications are the only effective tool to incorporate moderate amounts of Zn into the targeted organs. However, excessive applications of foliar sprays, particularly Zn, often damage fruit. Zinc formulations alone or in combination with other products are dangerous for some varieties under specific weather conditions. Although foliar applications can be a powerful tool under certain circumstances, the prescription must be technically justified. EEA Alto Valle Fil: Sánchez, Enrique Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina Fil: Righetti, Timothy L. Oregon State University (OSU). Departament of Horticulture; Estados Unidos 2025-09-15T14:28:06Z 2025-09-15T14:28:06Z 2002-11-30 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23812 https://www.actahort.org/books/594/594_45.htm 978-90-66058-26-2 0567-7572 2406-6168 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.594.45 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf ISHS Acta Horticulturae 594 : 363-368 (2002)
spellingShingle Pyrus communis
Malus domestica
Frutas de Pepita
Nutrición de las Plantas
Pome Fruits
Plant Nutrition
Apples
Pears
Trace Elements
Manzana
Pera
Oligoelementos
Mineral Nutrition
Micronutrients
Nutrición Mineral
Micronutrientes
Sanchez, Enrique Eduardo
Righetti, Timothy L.
Misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays
title Misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays
title_full Misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays
title_fullStr Misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays
title_full_unstemmed Misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays
title_short Misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays
title_sort misleading zinc deficiency diagnose in pome fruit and inappropriate use of foliar zinc sprays
topic Pyrus communis
Malus domestica
Frutas de Pepita
Nutrición de las Plantas
Pome Fruits
Plant Nutrition
Apples
Pears
Trace Elements
Manzana
Pera
Oligoelementos
Mineral Nutrition
Micronutrients
Nutrición Mineral
Micronutrientes
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23812
https://www.actahort.org/books/594/594_45.htm
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.594.45
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezenriqueeduardo misleadingzincdeficiencydiagnoseinpomefruitandinappropriateuseoffoliarzincsprays
AT righettitimothyl misleadingzincdeficiencydiagnoseinpomefruitandinappropriateuseoffoliarzincsprays