Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review
Nutritional research has provided a lot of evidence about the health benefits of vegetables. The aim of this review is to analyse factors, such as the genotype, the environment where plants are grown, cultural practices, post-harvest conditions among studies related to bioactive compounds in vegetab...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Taylor and Francis
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13405 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14620316.2021.1899061 https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2021.1899061 |
| _version_ | 1855485163622891520 |
|---|---|
| author | Soto Vargas, Verónica Carolina Gonzalez, Roxana Elizabeth Galmarini, Claudio Romulo |
| author_browse | Galmarini, Claudio Romulo Gonzalez, Roxana Elizabeth Soto Vargas, Verónica Carolina |
| author_facet | Soto Vargas, Verónica Carolina Gonzalez, Roxana Elizabeth Galmarini, Claudio Romulo |
| author_sort | Soto Vargas, Verónica Carolina |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | Nutritional research has provided a lot of evidence about the health benefits of vegetables. The aim of this review is to analyse factors, such as the genotype, the environment where plants are grown, cultural practices, post-harvest conditions among studies related to bioactive compounds in vegetables. This study includes a Systematic review of most of the published papers related to bioactive compounds present in five vegetables or their by-products. An electronic-based search of the literature published between 2000 and 2019 using the databases Scopus, Pubmed and ResearchGate, was carried out. Carrots, broccoli, lettuce, garlic and onion, whose consumption has been associated with medicinal properties were chosen. We observed that, in general, studies do not mention pre-harvest factors. In the case of broccoli and lettuce studies, at least one pre-harvest factor is mentioned, but most of the studies involving carrots do not mention any of these factors (89%). For the post-harvest factors, carrots had similar results, while the rest of the species studied were between 46 and 77%. This fact does not allow for good comparison and reproducibility. This should be emphasised in order to increase accuracy and to have stronger support to promote vegetable consumption. |
| format | Artículo |
| id | INTA13405 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateRange | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| publisherStr | Taylor and Francis |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA134052022-11-14T13:23:45Z Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review Soto Vargas, Verónica Carolina Gonzalez, Roxana Elizabeth Galmarini, Claudio Romulo Hortalizas (plantas) Compuestos Bioactivos Tecnología Postcosecha Información Vegetables Bioactive Compounds Postharvest Technology Information Nutritional research has provided a lot of evidence about the health benefits of vegetables. The aim of this review is to analyse factors, such as the genotype, the environment where plants are grown, cultural practices, post-harvest conditions among studies related to bioactive compounds in vegetables. This study includes a Systematic review of most of the published papers related to bioactive compounds present in five vegetables or their by-products. An electronic-based search of the literature published between 2000 and 2019 using the databases Scopus, Pubmed and ResearchGate, was carried out. Carrots, broccoli, lettuce, garlic and onion, whose consumption has been associated with medicinal properties were chosen. We observed that, in general, studies do not mention pre-harvest factors. In the case of broccoli and lettuce studies, at least one pre-harvest factor is mentioned, but most of the studies involving carrots do not mention any of these factors (89%). For the post-harvest factors, carrots had similar results, while the rest of the species studied were between 46 and 77%. This fact does not allow for good comparison and reproducibility. This should be emphasised in order to increase accuracy and to have stronger support to promote vegetable consumption. EEA La Consulta Fil: Soto Vargas, Verónica Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Soto Vargas, Verónica Carolina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Gonzalez, Roxana Elizabeth. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina Fil: Gonzalez, Roxana Elizabeth. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina Fil: Galmarini, Claudio Romulo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina Fil: Galmarini, Claudio Romulo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Galmarini, Claudio Romulo. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina 2022-11-14T13:16:22Z 2022-11-14T13:16:22Z 2021 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13405 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14620316.2021.1899061 1462-0316 https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2021.1899061 eng info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNHFA-1106071/AR./Aplicación de las capacidades de la horticultura nacional para el desarrollo de los territorios info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E7-I152-001/2019-PD-E7-I152-001/AR./Alimentos nutracéuticos, funcionales o para regímenes especiales. info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Taylor and Francis Journal of horticultural science and biotechnology 96 (5) : 570-587. (2021) |
| spellingShingle | Hortalizas (plantas) Compuestos Bioactivos Tecnología Postcosecha Información Vegetables Bioactive Compounds Postharvest Technology Information Soto Vargas, Verónica Carolina Gonzalez, Roxana Elizabeth Galmarini, Claudio Romulo Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review |
| title | Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review |
| title_full | Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review |
| title_short | Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review |
| title_sort | bioactive compounds in vegetables is there consistency in the published information a systematic review |
| topic | Hortalizas (plantas) Compuestos Bioactivos Tecnología Postcosecha Información Vegetables Bioactive Compounds Postharvest Technology Information |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13405 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14620316.2021.1899061 https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2021.1899061 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sotovargasveronicacarolina bioactivecompoundsinvegetablesisthereconsistencyinthepublishedinformationasystematicreview AT gonzalezroxanaelizabeth bioactivecompoundsinvegetablesisthereconsistencyinthepublishedinformationasystematicreview AT galmariniclaudioromulo bioactivecompoundsinvegetablesisthereconsistencyinthepublishedinformationasystematicreview |