Resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya

The resilience of rangeland soils and vegetation to different levels of grazing is still poorly understood. A study was conducted to determine the recovery of a rangeland grazed at different intensities and allowed a two-year rest period. The following treatments were applied to 0.5 hectare plots: 0...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mworia, J.K., Mnene, W.N., Musembi, D.K., Reid, Robin S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Informa UK Limited 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29984
_version_ 1855516323401957376
author Mworia, J.K.
Mnene, W.N.
Musembi, D.K.
Reid, Robin S.
author_browse Mnene, W.N.
Musembi, D.K.
Mworia, J.K.
Reid, Robin S.
author_facet Mworia, J.K.
Mnene, W.N.
Musembi, D.K.
Reid, Robin S.
author_sort Mworia, J.K.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The resilience of rangeland soils and vegetation to different levels of grazing is still poorly understood. A study was conducted to determine the recovery of a rangeland grazed at different intensities and allowed a two-year rest period. The following treatments were applied to 0.5 hectare plots: 0, 4, 8 and 16 heifers per hectare, hereafter referred to as CL, X, 2X and 4X respectively. At the end of the grazing period, the highest stocked treatments (2X and 4X) had lower herbage biomass, higher soil bulk density, lower soil moisture and lower herbaceous cover than the lower stocked treatments (CL and X). Drought in the rest period caused an increase in bulk density and decline in soil moisture in all the treatments. Even after the two-year rest period, the more heavily grazed treatments had higher bulk density and lower heavily grazed treatments had higher bulk density and lower soil moisture than the more lightly grazed treatments. Similarly, the herbaceous biomass in the 2X and 4X treatments did not recover after the two-year rest period and was lower (P<0.05) than the CL and X treatments. At the end of the recovery period a trend of declining herbaceous cover with stocking density was still evident. The relative cover of forbs in the 4X treatments increased more than in the other treatments, while the cover of perennial grasses did not recover in the 4X treatments after the rest period. Thus, stocking above 2X produced negative soil and vegetation responses which did not recover during the two-year rest period. This study also indicated that drought can cause vegetation and soil responses similar to those of overgrazing.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace29984
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1997
publishDateRange 1997
publishDateSort 1997
publisher Informa UK Limited
publisherStr Informa UK Limited
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace299842023-10-02T12:19:56Z Resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya Mworia, J.K. Mnene, W.N. Musembi, D.K. Reid, Robin S. semiarid zones rangelands soil vegetation grazing intensity ecology The resilience of rangeland soils and vegetation to different levels of grazing is still poorly understood. A study was conducted to determine the recovery of a rangeland grazed at different intensities and allowed a two-year rest period. The following treatments were applied to 0.5 hectare plots: 0, 4, 8 and 16 heifers per hectare, hereafter referred to as CL, X, 2X and 4X respectively. At the end of the grazing period, the highest stocked treatments (2X and 4X) had lower herbage biomass, higher soil bulk density, lower soil moisture and lower herbaceous cover than the lower stocked treatments (CL and X). Drought in the rest period caused an increase in bulk density and decline in soil moisture in all the treatments. Even after the two-year rest period, the more heavily grazed treatments had higher bulk density and lower heavily grazed treatments had higher bulk density and lower soil moisture than the more lightly grazed treatments. Similarly, the herbaceous biomass in the 2X and 4X treatments did not recover after the two-year rest period and was lower (P<0.05) than the CL and X treatments. At the end of the recovery period a trend of declining herbaceous cover with stocking density was still evident. The relative cover of forbs in the 4X treatments increased more than in the other treatments, while the cover of perennial grasses did not recover in the 4X treatments after the rest period. Thus, stocking above 2X produced negative soil and vegetation responses which did not recover during the two-year rest period. This study also indicated that drought can cause vegetation and soil responses similar to those of overgrazing. 1997-04 2013-06-11T09:25:42Z 2013-06-11T09:25:42Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29984 en Open Access Informa UK Limited African Journal of Range & Forage Science;14(1): 26-31
spellingShingle semiarid zones
rangelands
soil
vegetation
grazing intensity
ecology
Mworia, J.K.
Mnene, W.N.
Musembi, D.K.
Reid, Robin S.
Resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya
title Resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya
title_full Resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya
title_fullStr Resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya
title_short Resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya
title_sort resilience of soils and vegetation subjected to different grazing intensities in a semi arid rangeland of kenya
topic semiarid zones
rangelands
soil
vegetation
grazing intensity
ecology
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29984
work_keys_str_mv AT mworiajk resilienceofsoilsandvegetationsubjectedtodifferentgrazingintensitiesinasemiaridrangelandofkenya
AT mnenewn resilienceofsoilsandvegetationsubjectedtodifferentgrazingintensitiesinasemiaridrangelandofkenya
AT musembidk resilienceofsoilsandvegetationsubjectedtodifferentgrazingintensitiesinasemiaridrangelandofkenya
AT reidrobins resilienceofsoilsandvegetationsubjectedtodifferentgrazingintensitiesinasemiaridrangelandofkenya