Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation?
Payments for environmental services (PES) have the potential to become effective, cost-efficient and equitable instruments for implementing REDD+ on the ground. PES require certain preconditions to be satisfied, in particular land stewardship with ‘the right to exclude third parties’, which is not g...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20290 |
| _version_ | 1855533310158045184 |
|---|---|
| author | Wunder, Sven |
| author_browse | Wunder, Sven |
| author_facet | Wunder, Sven |
| author_sort | Wunder, Sven |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Payments for environmental services (PES) have the potential to become effective, cost-efficient and equitable instruments for implementing REDD+ on the ground. PES require certain preconditions to be satisfied, in particular land stewardship with ‘the right to exclude third parties’, which is not granted in many forest frontiers. Using spatial targeting toward high-threat, high-service and low-cost areas can dramatically improve PES carbon results. Failing to use these design features can make PES inefficient. |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace20290 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateRange | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Center for International Forestry Research |
| publisherStr | Center for International Forestry Research |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace202902025-01-24T14:20:08Z Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? Wunder, Sven payment schemes payments for environmental services climate change Payments for environmental services (PES) have the potential to become effective, cost-efficient and equitable instruments for implementing REDD+ on the ground. PES require certain preconditions to be satisfied, in particular land stewardship with ‘the right to exclude third parties’, which is not granted in many forest frontiers. Using spatial targeting toward high-threat, high-service and low-cost areas can dramatically improve PES carbon results. Failing to use these design features can make PES inefficient. 2009 2012-06-04T09:13:14Z 2012-06-04T09:13:14Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20290 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Wunder, S. 2009. Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? . In: Angelsen, A. with Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds).. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. :213-224. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ISBN: 978-6-02-869303-5.. |
| spellingShingle | payment schemes payments for environmental services climate change Wunder, Sven Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? |
| title | Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? |
| title_full | Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? |
| title_fullStr | Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? |
| title_short | Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? |
| title_sort | can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation |
| topic | payment schemes payments for environmental services climate change |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20290 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wundersven canpaymentsforenvironmentalservicesreducedeforestationandforestdegradation |