Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation?
Payments for environmental services (PES) have the potential to become effective, cost-efficient and equitable instruments for implementing REDD+ on the ground. PES require certain preconditions to be satisfied, in particular land stewardship with ‘the right to exclude third parties’, which is not g...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20290 |
Ejemplares similares: Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation?
- Increasing the efficiency of conservation spending: the case of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica
- Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence
- Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: increasing efficiency through spatial differentiation
- The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation
- When payments for environmental services will work for conservation
- Reducing forest emissions in the Amazon Basin: a review of drivers of land-use change and how payments for environmental services (PES) schemes can affect them
