Lessons from forestry decentralisation
REDD+ is more likely to be just and locally legitimate if the design, implementation and allocation of benefits represent local needs and aspirations. Decentralisation of meaningful decisions to locally accountable and responsive (e.g., representative) local authorities would promote local engagemen...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20288 |
Similar Items: Lessons from forestry decentralisation
- Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens
- Democratic decentralisation through a natural resources lens: an introduction
- Communities, property rights and forest decentralisation in Kenya: early lessons from participatory forestry management
- Formal decentralisation and the imperative of decentralisation 'from below': a case study of natural resource management in Nicaragua
- Decentralisation and forest management in Latin America: towards a working model
- Trends in Latin American forestry decentralisations: legal frameworks, municipal governments and forest dependent groups