Lessons from forestry decentralisation
REDD+ is more likely to be just and locally legitimate if the design, implementation and allocation of benefits represent local needs and aspirations. Decentralisation of meaningful decisions to locally accountable and responsive (e.g., representative) local authorities would promote local engagemen...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20288 |
| _version_ | 1855536621816905728 |
|---|---|
| author | Larson, A.M. Ribot, J.C. |
| author_browse | Larson, A.M. Ribot, J.C. |
| author_facet | Larson, A.M. Ribot, J.C. |
| author_sort | Larson, A.M. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | REDD+ is more likely to be just and locally legitimate if the design, implementation and allocation of benefits represent local needs and aspirations. Decentralisation of meaningful decisions to locally accountable and responsive (e.g., representative) local authorities would promote local engagement in REDD+ decision making. The level at which rules are made and benefits distributed will be a key issue in the legitimacy, effectiveness, efficiency and equity of REDD+. |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace20288 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateRange | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Center for International Forestry Research |
| publisherStr | Center for International Forestry Research |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace202882025-01-24T14:20:28Z Lessons from forestry decentralisation Larson, A.M. Ribot, J.C. climate change decentralization governance forest management REDD+ is more likely to be just and locally legitimate if the design, implementation and allocation of benefits represent local needs and aspirations. Decentralisation of meaningful decisions to locally accountable and responsive (e.g., representative) local authorities would promote local engagement in REDD+ decision making. The level at which rules are made and benefits distributed will be a key issue in the legitimacy, effectiveness, efficiency and equity of REDD+. 2009 2012-06-04T09:13:14Z 2012-06-04T09:13:14Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20288 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Larson, A.M., Ribot, J.C. 2009. Lessons from forestry decentralisation . In: Angelsen, A. with Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds).. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. :175-190. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ISBN: 978-6-02-869303-5.. |
| spellingShingle | climate change decentralization governance forest management Larson, A.M. Ribot, J.C. Lessons from forestry decentralisation |
| title | Lessons from forestry decentralisation |
| title_full | Lessons from forestry decentralisation |
| title_fullStr | Lessons from forestry decentralisation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Lessons from forestry decentralisation |
| title_short | Lessons from forestry decentralisation |
| title_sort | lessons from forestry decentralisation |
| topic | climate change decentralization governance forest management |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20288 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT larsonam lessonsfromforestrydecentralisation AT ribotjc lessonsfromforestrydecentralisation |