Fertilizer subsidies versus soil health payments: does policy incentives framing matter
Many fertilizer subsidy programs in Africa, characterized by limited flexibility, have produced smaller-than-expected overall returns, partly due to low and variable returns to fertilizer and limited uptake of complementary practices that can improve soil health and crop yield responses. Amid growin...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Informe técnico |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
CIMMYT
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/180567 |
Similar Items: Fertilizer subsidies versus soil health payments: does policy incentives framing matter
- Does an inorganic fertilizer subsidy promote the use of organic fertilizers in Nigeria?
- Explicit versus implicit food subsidies: Distribution of costs
- Fertilizer subsidies in Africa: Are vouchers the answer?
- Fertilizer subsidy and agricultural productivity in Senegal
- The economywide impacts and risks of Malawi’s farm input subsidy program
- Market friendly alternatives to fertilizer input subsidies