Fertilizer subsidies versus soil health payments: does policy incentives framing matter
Many fertilizer subsidy programs in Africa, characterized by limited flexibility, have produced smaller-than-expected overall returns, partly due to low and variable returns to fertilizer and limited uptake of complementary practices that can improve soil health and crop yield responses. Amid growin...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Informe técnico |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
CIMMYT
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/180567 |
Ejemplares similares: Fertilizer subsidies versus soil health payments: does policy incentives framing matter
- Does an inorganic fertilizer subsidy promote the use of organic fertilizers in Nigeria?
- Explicit versus implicit food subsidies: Distribution of costs
- Fertilizer subsidies in Africa: Are vouchers the answer?
- Fertilizer subsidy and agricultural productivity in Senegal
- The economywide impacts and risks of Malawi’s farm input subsidy program
- Market friendly alternatives to fertilizer input subsidies