Assessing and attributing the benefits from varietal improvement research: evidence from Embrapa, Brazil
In general, reported rates of return to agricultural R&D are high, but questions have been raised about upward biases in the evidence. Among the reasons for this bias, insufficient attention to attribution aspects. Matching of research benefits and costs is a pervasive problem, the magnitude of whic...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo preliminar |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2002
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/155567 |
Ejemplares similares: Assessing and attributing the benefits from varietal improvement research: evidence from Embrapa, Brazil
- Assessing and attributing the benefits from varietal improvement research in Brazil
- Attribution and other problems in assessing the returns to agricultural R&D
- Reassessing research returns: attribution and related problems
- Papers on human resource productivity within EMBRAPA.
- Summary of a productive partnership: the benefits from U.S. participation in the CGIAR
- Synopsis: Public investment prioritization for Rwanda's agricultural transformation: Benefits of an increase in public spending on agriculture under PSTA4