Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia

Using an equivalent variation approach, we estimate households’ willingness-to-pay for rural feeder roads in Ethiopia. The problem of endogenous road placement is addressed by a purposeful data collection process as the survey site was chosen in such a way that the primary difference between househo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stifel, David, Minten, Bart, Koru, Bethlehem
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153878
_version_ 1855543710074273792
author Stifel, David
Minten, Bart
Koru, Bethlehem
author_browse Koru, Bethlehem
Minten, Bart
Stifel, David
author_facet Stifel, David
Minten, Bart
Koru, Bethlehem
author_sort Stifel, David
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Using an equivalent variation approach, we estimate households’ willingness-to-pay for rural feeder roads in Ethiopia. The problem of endogenous road placement is addressed by a purposeful data collection process as the survey site was chosen in such a way that the primary difference between households in the otherwise homogeneous region is that transport costs to the same market differ substantially within the region (most remote households have to walk eight hours to reach the market). Using this quasi-experimental setting, we compare the economic behavior of households by remoteness, allowing us to estimate the benefits of having access to feeder roads for rural households. We find that the benefits of reducing transportation costs by 50 US Dollars per metric ton for the most remote households would result in benefits worth roughly 35 percent of household consumption and that a hypothetical gravel road built halfway through the survey site that lasts 10 years will have an internal rate of return that ranges from 12 to 34 percent, using conservative assumptions. The lower range of estimates allows for transport services that are restricted to intermediate means of transport such as donkey-drawn carts. These results suggest that investments in rural feeder roads are cost-effective ways to help reduce widespread poverty even in unfavorable settings where (a) small-scale farmers have low levels of marketed agricultural surplus, (b) nonfarm earnings opportunities are negligible, and (c) the provision of motorized transport services is not guaranteed.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace153878
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1538782025-11-06T07:15:59Z Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia Stifel, David Minten, Bart Koru, Bethlehem transport costs infrastructure welfare households models Using an equivalent variation approach, we estimate households’ willingness-to-pay for rural feeder roads in Ethiopia. The problem of endogenous road placement is addressed by a purposeful data collection process as the survey site was chosen in such a way that the primary difference between households in the otherwise homogeneous region is that transport costs to the same market differ substantially within the region (most remote households have to walk eight hours to reach the market). Using this quasi-experimental setting, we compare the economic behavior of households by remoteness, allowing us to estimate the benefits of having access to feeder roads for rural households. We find that the benefits of reducing transportation costs by 50 US Dollars per metric ton for the most remote households would result in benefits worth roughly 35 percent of household consumption and that a hypothetical gravel road built halfway through the survey site that lasts 10 years will have an internal rate of return that ranges from 12 to 34 percent, using conservative assumptions. The lower range of estimates allows for transport services that are restricted to intermediate means of transport such as donkey-drawn carts. These results suggest that investments in rural feeder roads are cost-effective ways to help reduce widespread poverty even in unfavorable settings where (a) small-scale farmers have low levels of marketed agricultural surplus, (b) nonfarm earnings opportunities are negligible, and (c) the provision of motorized transport services is not guaranteed. 2012 2024-10-01T13:58:09Z 2024-10-01T13:58:09Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153878 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Ethiopian Development Research Institute Stifel, David; Minten, Bart; Koru, Bethlehem 2012. Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153878
spellingShingle transport
costs
infrastructure
welfare
households
models
Stifel, David
Minten, Bart
Koru, Bethlehem
Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia
title Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia
title_full Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia
title_fullStr Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia
title_short Economic Benefits and Returns to Rural Feeder Roads: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Setting in Ethiopia
title_sort economic benefits and returns to rural feeder roads evidence from a quasi experimental setting in ethiopia
topic transport
costs
infrastructure
welfare
households
models
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153878
work_keys_str_mv AT stifeldavid economicbenefitsandreturnstoruralfeederroadsevidencefromaquasiexperimentalsettinginethiopia
AT mintenbart economicbenefitsandreturnstoruralfeederroadsevidencefromaquasiexperimentalsettinginethiopia
AT korubethlehem economicbenefitsandreturnstoruralfeederroadsevidencefromaquasiexperimentalsettinginethiopia