From food subsidies to cash transfers: Assessing economy-wide benefits and trade-offs in Egypt
Food is a vital part of poor households' budgets and so subsidizing staple foods would appear to be an obvious pro-poor policy. Indeed, most countries in North Africa have prioritized large national subsidy programs for staple foods and fuels as their main social safety net. However, these programs...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130295 |
Ejemplares similares: From food subsidies to cash transfers: Assessing economy-wide benefits and trade-offs in Egypt
- Food subsidies and cash transfers in Egypt: Evaluating general equilibrium benefits and trade-offs
- An agricultural policy review of Egypt: First steps towards a new strategy
- Creating fiscal space for enhancing public investment in Sindh agriculture sector: A qualitative study of provincial spending in Pakistan
- Too much of a good thing? Evidence that fertilizer subsidies lead to overapplication in Egypt
- Investing in the agri-food system for post-COVID-19 recovery: An economywide evaluation of public investments in Egypt
- Linkages between government spending, growth, and poverty in rural India