Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap

Motivation Around 80% of milk in Kenya is marketed informally, providing livelihoods and contributing to food security and nutrition of low-income consumers. Government policy, however, is focused on formalization—primarily through licensing and pasteurization—with enforcement via fines, confiscatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blackmore, E., Guarín, A., Vorley, B., Alonso, Silvia, Grace, Delia
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114798
_version_ 1855535039828197376
author Blackmore, E.
Guarín, A.
Vorley, B.
Alonso, Silvia
Grace, Delia
author_browse Alonso, Silvia
Blackmore, E.
Grace, Delia
Guarín, A.
Vorley, B.
author_facet Blackmore, E.
Guarín, A.
Vorley, B.
Alonso, Silvia
Grace, Delia
author_sort Blackmore, E.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Motivation Around 80% of milk in Kenya is marketed informally, providing livelihoods and contributing to food security and nutrition of low-income consumers. Government policy, however, is focused on formalization—primarily through licensing and pasteurization—with enforcement via fines, confiscation of milk or closing the premises of informal actors. Purpose This paper seeks to better understand if, and why, Kenya’s informal milk sector and regulatory system are disconnected from one another and how the policy–reality gap might be better bridged. Methods and approach To understand the nature and performance of Kenya’s informal milk markets and their governance, we used a mix of research methods and data sources, including surveys with informal market players, and key informant interviews with key sector stakeholders. Fieldwork was carried out in Nairobi in late 2018. Findings Milk safety and quality matters to all actors in informal milk value chains. The trust-based system used is effective in moderating behaviours and assessing and prioritizing quality and safety. Government policy is not accomplishing the stated goal of formalization: licensing levels remain low among informal actors. Pasteurization is not rewarded in the market. There is some evidence of suboptimal pasteurization processes being undertaken to satisfy regulators. There is a gap between the reality of Kenya’s informal milk sector and its regulatory system. Policy implications The regulation–reality gap manifests itself as adversarial relationships between regulators and informal actors, and unnecessary transaction costs, missing opportunities for enhancing livelihoods, food safety and food security. New approaches should build on and consider existing approaches taken by actors in informal food markets to ensure food safety and quality. Policy-makers should seek to communicate more effectively with informal actors and engage in more constructive dialogue on inclusive ways forward.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace114798
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1147982025-10-26T12:56:12Z Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap Blackmore, E. Guarín, A. Vorley, B. Alonso, Silvia Grace, Delia milk dairying markets policies Motivation Around 80% of milk in Kenya is marketed informally, providing livelihoods and contributing to food security and nutrition of low-income consumers. Government policy, however, is focused on formalization—primarily through licensing and pasteurization—with enforcement via fines, confiscation of milk or closing the premises of informal actors. Purpose This paper seeks to better understand if, and why, Kenya’s informal milk sector and regulatory system are disconnected from one another and how the policy–reality gap might be better bridged. Methods and approach To understand the nature and performance of Kenya’s informal milk markets and their governance, we used a mix of research methods and data sources, including surveys with informal market players, and key informant interviews with key sector stakeholders. Fieldwork was carried out in Nairobi in late 2018. Findings Milk safety and quality matters to all actors in informal milk value chains. The trust-based system used is effective in moderating behaviours and assessing and prioritizing quality and safety. Government policy is not accomplishing the stated goal of formalization: licensing levels remain low among informal actors. Pasteurization is not rewarded in the market. There is some evidence of suboptimal pasteurization processes being undertaken to satisfy regulators. There is a gap between the reality of Kenya’s informal milk sector and its regulatory system. Policy implications The regulation–reality gap manifests itself as adversarial relationships between regulators and informal actors, and unnecessary transaction costs, missing opportunities for enhancing livelihoods, food safety and food security. New approaches should build on and consider existing approaches taken by actors in informal food markets to ensure food safety and quality. Policy-makers should seek to communicate more effectively with informal actors and engage in more constructive dialogue on inclusive ways forward. 2022-05 2021-08-30T13:18:51Z 2021-08-30T13:18:51Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114798 en Open Access Wiley Blackmore, E., Guarín, A., Vorley, B., Alonso, S. and Grace, D. 2022. Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap. Development Policy Review 40(3): e12581.
spellingShingle milk
dairying
markets
policies
Blackmore, E.
Guarín, A.
Vorley, B.
Alonso, Silvia
Grace, Delia
Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap
title Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap
title_full Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap
title_fullStr Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap
title_full_unstemmed Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap
title_short Kenya's informal milk markets and the regulation-reality gap
title_sort kenya s informal milk markets and the regulation reality gap
topic milk
dairying
markets
policies
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114798
work_keys_str_mv AT blackmoree kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap
AT guarina kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap
AT vorleyb kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap
AT alonsosilvia kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap
AT gracedelia kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap