The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve

Twenty-five newly bred improved cassava cultivars, twenty-three improved from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture and two local cultivars were evaluated for their relative resistance to African cassava mosaic begomovirus disease (ACMD) at Ibadan, in an area of high disease pressure r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ariyo, O.A., Dixon, A.G.O., Atiri, G.I.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Informa UK Limited 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109336
_version_ 1855529309450534912
author Ariyo, O.A.
Dixon, A.G.O.
Atiri, G.I.
author_browse Ariyo, O.A.
Atiri, G.I.
Dixon, A.G.O.
author_facet Ariyo, O.A.
Dixon, A.G.O.
Atiri, G.I.
author_sort Ariyo, O.A.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Twenty-five newly bred improved cassava cultivars, twenty-three improved from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture and two local cultivars were evaluated for their relative resistance to African cassava mosaic begomovirus disease (ACMD) at Ibadan, in an area of high disease pressure representative of the forest/savanna transition zone of Nigeria. These cultivars were exposed to natural infection by the viruliferous whiteflies ( Bemisia tabaci Gennadius) and the Disease Incidence (DI) and index of symptom severity (ISS) were assessed for all clones. Results for the Rank-sum (i.e., sum of ranks for DI and ISS for each cultivar) and the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) were used to assess the relative resistance of the cassava clones. Those that showed low Rank-sum and AUDPC values were rated 'moderately resistant (MR)', 'resistant (R)', and 'highly resistant (HR)' to ACMD depending on their respective values and deviation from the mean distribution curve. Clones M94/0121 and 94/0239 were rated HR under the two methods. Clone M94/0583 was rated HR under the AUDPC with a deviation from the mean distribution curve of m 2.00 while it was rated R under the Rank-sum method with a deviation from the mean distribution of m 1.99. Also plants of clones ISU and TMS 30572 were rated highly infection (HS) under both methods. Clone TME-1 was intermediate between Moderately Resistant (MR) and Moderately Resistant (MS) under the AUDPC method with a deviation from the mean distribution of 0.00 but observed to be MS under the Rank-sum method with a deviation of + 0.2. The two methods of evaluation gave similar results as revealed by Spearman rank correlation ( r equals; 0.99, P <0.01). However, the AUDPC method is less cumbersome compared to the Rank-sum method. None of the clones was observed to be immune to the disease.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace109336
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2002
publishDateRange 2002
publishDateSort 2002
publisher Informa UK Limited
publisherStr Informa UK Limited
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1093362023-06-12T16:07:53Z The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve Ariyo, O.A. Dixon, A.G.O. Atiri, G.I. cassava cultivars infection clones disease incidence Twenty-five newly bred improved cassava cultivars, twenty-three improved from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture and two local cultivars were evaluated for their relative resistance to African cassava mosaic begomovirus disease (ACMD) at Ibadan, in an area of high disease pressure representative of the forest/savanna transition zone of Nigeria. These cultivars were exposed to natural infection by the viruliferous whiteflies ( Bemisia tabaci Gennadius) and the Disease Incidence (DI) and index of symptom severity (ISS) were assessed for all clones. Results for the Rank-sum (i.e., sum of ranks for DI and ISS for each cultivar) and the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) were used to assess the relative resistance of the cassava clones. Those that showed low Rank-sum and AUDPC values were rated 'moderately resistant (MR)', 'resistant (R)', and 'highly resistant (HR)' to ACMD depending on their respective values and deviation from the mean distribution curve. Clones M94/0121 and 94/0239 were rated HR under the two methods. Clone M94/0583 was rated HR under the AUDPC with a deviation from the mean distribution curve of m 2.00 while it was rated R under the Rank-sum method with a deviation from the mean distribution of m 1.99. Also plants of clones ISU and TMS 30572 were rated highly infection (HS) under both methods. Clone TME-1 was intermediate between Moderately Resistant (MR) and Moderately Resistant (MS) under the AUDPC method with a deviation from the mean distribution of 0.00 but observed to be MS under the Rank-sum method with a deviation of + 0.2. The two methods of evaluation gave similar results as revealed by Spearman rank correlation ( r equals; 0.99, P <0.01). However, the AUDPC method is less cumbersome compared to the Rank-sum method. None of the clones was observed to be immune to the disease. 2002-01 2020-09-08T06:57:41Z 2020-09-08T06:57:41Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109336 en Limited Access Informa UK Limited Ariyo, O.A., Dixon, A.G.O. & Atiri, G.I. (2002). The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve. Archive of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 35(1), 23-30.
spellingShingle cassava
cultivars
infection
clones
disease incidence
Ariyo, O.A.
Dixon, A.G.O.
Atiri, G.I.
The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve
title The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve
title_full The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve
title_fullStr The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve
title_full_unstemmed The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve
title_short The relative resistance of cassava cultivars to African Cassava Mosaic Disease (ACMD) as determined by two methods: ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve
title_sort relative resistance of cassava cultivars to african cassava mosaic disease acmd as determined by two methods ranksum and the area under the disease progress curve
topic cassava
cultivars
infection
clones
disease incidence
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109336
work_keys_str_mv AT ariyooa therelativeresistanceofcassavacultivarstoafricancassavamosaicdiseaseacmdasdeterminedbytwomethodsranksumandtheareaunderthediseaseprogresscurve
AT dixonago therelativeresistanceofcassavacultivarstoafricancassavamosaicdiseaseacmdasdeterminedbytwomethodsranksumandtheareaunderthediseaseprogresscurve
AT atirigi therelativeresistanceofcassavacultivarstoafricancassavamosaicdiseaseacmdasdeterminedbytwomethodsranksumandtheareaunderthediseaseprogresscurve
AT ariyooa relativeresistanceofcassavacultivarstoafricancassavamosaicdiseaseacmdasdeterminedbytwomethodsranksumandtheareaunderthediseaseprogresscurve
AT dixonago relativeresistanceofcassavacultivarstoafricancassavamosaicdiseaseacmdasdeterminedbytwomethodsranksumandtheareaunderthediseaseprogresscurve
AT atirigi relativeresistanceofcassavacultivarstoafricancassavamosaicdiseaseacmdasdeterminedbytwomethodsranksumandtheareaunderthediseaseprogresscurve