Barriers effect on lotic fish fauna
Barriers in running (lotic) waters are known to have serious impacts on fish fauna that would otherwise naturally colonialize them. The two most important effects barriers have on lotic fish fauna are the blockage of fish migration routes and the reduction of water velocity. These effects can in...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | H2 |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
SLU/Dept. Of Aquatic Resources
2016
|
| Materias: |
| _version_ | 1855571441185980416 |
|---|---|
| author | Rudin, Johan |
| author_browse | Rudin, Johan |
| author_facet | Rudin, Johan |
| author_sort | Rudin, Johan |
| collection | Epsilon Archive for Student Projects |
| description | Barriers in running (lotic) waters are known to have serious impacts on fish fauna that would
otherwise naturally colonialize them. The two most important effects barriers have on lotic fish
fauna are the blockage of fish migration routes and the reduction of water velocity. These effects
can in turn change the conditions for survival for species using lotic habitats. In this study I have
investigated how barriers effect lotic fish fauna and whether the number of barriers blocking a
river section from a migration pool is an important factor affecting these communities. To
investigate this, a specially designed net, The Nordic multi-mesh Stream Survey Net (NSSN), for
lotic watercourses was used to sample fish in the Swedish river Hedströmmen during July 2015.
The number of species caught in the net was noted, the number of individuals per species
counted, and in addition the body length was measured for European perch (Perca fluviatilis). In
contrast to our predictions, number of species did not differ between unblocked and blocked
sections in the river. However, there were differences in abundance (i.e. total number of
individuals), although species differed in this respect. Seven out of the total eleven species were
unevenly distributed between the two site categories (blocked and unblocked), in general
showing a greater abundance in unblocked sites, thus following the predictions of this study. For
European perch there were also differences in body length between the sites, with mean length
being larger in blocked sites, proving different ecological implications depending on whether the
site is obstructed or not. These results thus indicate that many fish species in lotic waters are
affected by barriers. |
| format | H2 |
| id | RepoSLU8982 |
| institution | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | SLU/Dept. Of Aquatic Resources |
| publisherStr | SLU/Dept. Of Aquatic Resources |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | RepoSLU89822016-04-26T12:50:01Z Barriers effect on lotic fish fauna Barriärers påverkan på fiskfauna i rinnande vattendrag Rudin, Johan migration barriers, Lotic fish fauna Barriers in running (lotic) waters are known to have serious impacts on fish fauna that would otherwise naturally colonialize them. The two most important effects barriers have on lotic fish fauna are the blockage of fish migration routes and the reduction of water velocity. These effects can in turn change the conditions for survival for species using lotic habitats. In this study I have investigated how barriers effect lotic fish fauna and whether the number of barriers blocking a river section from a migration pool is an important factor affecting these communities. To investigate this, a specially designed net, The Nordic multi-mesh Stream Survey Net (NSSN), for lotic watercourses was used to sample fish in the Swedish river Hedströmmen during July 2015. The number of species caught in the net was noted, the number of individuals per species counted, and in addition the body length was measured for European perch (Perca fluviatilis). In contrast to our predictions, number of species did not differ between unblocked and blocked sections in the river. However, there were differences in abundance (i.e. total number of individuals), although species differed in this respect. Seven out of the total eleven species were unevenly distributed between the two site categories (blocked and unblocked), in general showing a greater abundance in unblocked sites, thus following the predictions of this study. For European perch there were also differences in body length between the sites, with mean length being larger in blocked sites, proving different ecological implications depending on whether the site is obstructed or not. These results thus indicate that many fish species in lotic waters are affected by barriers. SLU/Dept. Of Aquatic Resources 2016 H2 eng https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/8982/ |
| spellingShingle | migration barriers, Lotic fish fauna Rudin, Johan Barriers effect on lotic fish fauna |
| title | Barriers effect on lotic fish fauna |
| title_full | Barriers effect on lotic fish fauna |
| title_fullStr | Barriers effect on lotic fish fauna |
| title_full_unstemmed | Barriers effect on lotic fish fauna |
| title_short | Barriers effect on lotic fish fauna |
| title_sort | barriers effect on lotic fish fauna |
| topic | migration barriers, Lotic fish fauna |