Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs

The reality of current pig production practices in the European Union is that a majority of Member States are in violation of current legislation. This violation of minimum level legislation has been ongoing for several years. The latest version of the directive of pigs is Council Directive 2008/120...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Toro, Isabelle
Format: First cycle, G2E
Language:Swedish
Inglés
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/8410/
_version_ 1855571346186043392
author Toro, Isabelle
author_browse Toro, Isabelle
author_facet Toro, Isabelle
author_sort Toro, Isabelle
collection Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
description The reality of current pig production practices in the European Union is that a majority of Member States are in violation of current legislation. This violation of minimum level legislation has been ongoing for several years. The latest version of the directive of pigs is Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, which clearly states that provision of manipulable material is a requirement. In addition tail docking is not to be performed on a routine basis. Before tail docking farmers must first try to prevent tail biting by changing inadequate environmental conditions. In recent years this issue has drawn attention from various directions; universities, animal welfare societies, European Parliament’s Intergroup on Animal Welfare and Member State Ministers, yet the issue remains unresolved. The aim of this study was to collect and analyse the opinions of Members of Parliament regarding the subject of lack of compliance with the Directive on Pigs, as well as to investigate how involved Members of Parliament are in the issue. This was done through an email questionnaire. The results should be interpreted with caution. The knowledge of Members of Parliament on pig welfare legislation is varied and the actual knowledge of the current situation is very diverse. The issue of lack of compliance to current legislation has different views of prioritization among Members of Parliament. However full compliance is of importance. Members of Parliament express that the European Commission has not actively lived up to their role in the issue of non-compliance among Member States. It can be concluded that there is a wide variation in the perceptions of Members of Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Furthermore through strict office policies of some Members of Parliament to not answer surveys, it is impossible to examine what issues these politicians are prioritizing to work with. This study presents a first glimpse at the attention paid to pig welfare amongst Members of Parliament and the attitudes towards non-compliance with current legislation. Members of Parliament expect the European Commission to do more on the issue of non-compliance to pig legislation. It is of the utmost importance that the Commission takes urgent action to improve the compliance rate among Member States to the Directive on Pigs.
format First cycle, G2E
id RepoSLU8410
institution Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
language Swedish
Inglés
publishDate 2015
publishDateSort 2015
record_format eprints
spelling RepoSLU84102015-08-27T08:45:44Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/8410/ Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs Toro, Isabelle Agricultural economics and policies Animal husbandry The reality of current pig production practices in the European Union is that a majority of Member States are in violation of current legislation. This violation of minimum level legislation has been ongoing for several years. The latest version of the directive of pigs is Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, which clearly states that provision of manipulable material is a requirement. In addition tail docking is not to be performed on a routine basis. Before tail docking farmers must first try to prevent tail biting by changing inadequate environmental conditions. In recent years this issue has drawn attention from various directions; universities, animal welfare societies, European Parliament’s Intergroup on Animal Welfare and Member State Ministers, yet the issue remains unresolved. The aim of this study was to collect and analyse the opinions of Members of Parliament regarding the subject of lack of compliance with the Directive on Pigs, as well as to investigate how involved Members of Parliament are in the issue. This was done through an email questionnaire. The results should be interpreted with caution. The knowledge of Members of Parliament on pig welfare legislation is varied and the actual knowledge of the current situation is very diverse. The issue of lack of compliance to current legislation has different views of prioritization among Members of Parliament. However full compliance is of importance. Members of Parliament express that the European Commission has not actively lived up to their role in the issue of non-compliance among Member States. It can be concluded that there is a wide variation in the perceptions of Members of Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Furthermore through strict office policies of some Members of Parliament to not answer surveys, it is impossible to examine what issues these politicians are prioritizing to work with. This study presents a first glimpse at the attention paid to pig welfare amongst Members of Parliament and the attitudes towards non-compliance with current legislation. Members of Parliament expect the European Commission to do more on the issue of non-compliance to pig legislation. It is of the utmost importance that the Commission takes urgent action to improve the compliance rate among Member States to the Directive on Pigs. 2015-08-20 First cycle, G2E NonPeerReviewed application/pdf sv https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/8410/1/Toro_I_150820.pdf Toro, Isabelle, 2015. Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs. First cycle, G2E. Skara: (VH) > Dept. of Animal Environment and Health (until 231231) <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-880.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-4772 eng
spellingShingle Agricultural economics and policies
Animal husbandry
Toro, Isabelle
Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs
title Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs
title_full Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs
title_fullStr Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs
title_full_unstemmed Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs
title_short Opinions of Members of the European Parliament regarding lack of compliance with the Council Directive on Pigs
title_sort opinions of members of the european parliament regarding lack of compliance with the council directive on pigs
topic Agricultural economics and policies
Animal husbandry
url https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/8410/
https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/8410/