Environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment
In recent years, the production of biogas from animal manure has gained increased attention in Denmark, as it has been identified as an important resource to reach the goal of a fossil free society by 2050. In addition, manure management with biogas production has been recognized as a viable way t...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | H2 |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
SLU/Dept. of Urban and Rural Development
2012
|
| Materias: |
| _version_ | 1855570740575731712 |
|---|---|
| author | Croxatto Vega, Giovanna Catalina |
| author_browse | Croxatto Vega, Giovanna Catalina |
| author_facet | Croxatto Vega, Giovanna Catalina |
| author_sort | Croxatto Vega, Giovanna Catalina |
| collection | Epsilon Archive for Student Projects |
| description | In recent years, the production of biogas from animal manure has gained increased attention in Denmark,
as it has been identified as an important resource to reach the goal of a fossil free society by 2050. In
addition, manure management with biogas production has been recognized as a viable way to reduce
environmental impacts from animal production systems. Yet, because the methane production potential of
animal manure is low, biogas plants depend on the addition of high energy organic wastes as co-substrates
to manure, to make their operations profitable. The latter are in short supply and are already being
imported in countries like Denmark. The use of different co-substrates and their biogas potential has been
investigated, but there is presently a lack of knowledge about the environmental impacts of using one cosubstrate
versus another. Therefore, this study assessed the environmental impacts of three co-substrates
to pig slurry, which are currently underexploited; namely extruded wheat straw, the organic fraction of
municipal solid waste, and the solid fraction of liquid-solid separated slurry. A comparative LCA was carried
out, where the conventional manure management scheme of slurry storage and subsequent application to
arable fields was compared to this three different ways of biogas production. Upon the analysis, extruded
wheat straw was identified as a superior co-substrate. This is due to its low nutrient content, high methane
yield potential, and low water content, which resulted in the lowest environmental impacts for
eutrophication and the most savings for climate change potential. The second best co-substrate was
identified to be the solid fraction of separated slurry and lastly the OFMSW had the most environmental
impacts out of all scenarios, due to its relationship to energy production from incineration. A sensitivity
analysis, where different methane yield potentials were tested for each co-substrate, was performed and
the results proved to be robust. However, increase detail to the model is necessary to provide more
confidence to the results, since system expansion activities proved to be crucial for the performance of
each scenario. |
| format | H2 |
| id | RepoSLU4785 |
| institution | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | SLU/Dept. of Urban and Rural Development |
| publisherStr | SLU/Dept. of Urban and Rural Development |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | RepoSLU47852012-09-11T08:52:46Z Environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment Croxatto Vega, Giovanna Catalina biogas pig slurry substrate environmental impacts wheat straw OFMSW organic fraction municipal solid waste solid fraction separated slurry LCA life cycle assessment In recent years, the production of biogas from animal manure has gained increased attention in Denmark, as it has been identified as an important resource to reach the goal of a fossil free society by 2050. In addition, manure management with biogas production has been recognized as a viable way to reduce environmental impacts from animal production systems. Yet, because the methane production potential of animal manure is low, biogas plants depend on the addition of high energy organic wastes as co-substrates to manure, to make their operations profitable. The latter are in short supply and are already being imported in countries like Denmark. The use of different co-substrates and their biogas potential has been investigated, but there is presently a lack of knowledge about the environmental impacts of using one cosubstrate versus another. Therefore, this study assessed the environmental impacts of three co-substrates to pig slurry, which are currently underexploited; namely extruded wheat straw, the organic fraction of municipal solid waste, and the solid fraction of liquid-solid separated slurry. A comparative LCA was carried out, where the conventional manure management scheme of slurry storage and subsequent application to arable fields was compared to this three different ways of biogas production. Upon the analysis, extruded wheat straw was identified as a superior co-substrate. This is due to its low nutrient content, high methane yield potential, and low water content, which resulted in the lowest environmental impacts for eutrophication and the most savings for climate change potential. The second best co-substrate was identified to be the solid fraction of separated slurry and lastly the OFMSW had the most environmental impacts out of all scenarios, due to its relationship to energy production from incineration. A sensitivity analysis, where different methane yield potentials were tested for each co-substrate, was performed and the results proved to be robust. However, increase detail to the model is necessary to provide more confidence to the results, since system expansion activities proved to be crucial for the performance of each scenario. SLU/Dept. of Urban and Rural Development 2012 H2 eng https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/4785/ |
| spellingShingle | biogas pig slurry substrate environmental impacts wheat straw OFMSW organic fraction municipal solid waste solid fraction separated slurry LCA life cycle assessment Croxatto Vega, Giovanna Catalina Environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment |
| title | Environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment |
| title_full | Environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment |
| title_fullStr | Environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment |
| title_short | Environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment |
| title_sort | environmental impacts of alternative co-substrates for biogas production : a comparative life cycle assessment |
| topic | biogas pig slurry substrate environmental impacts wheat straw OFMSW organic fraction municipal solid waste solid fraction separated slurry LCA life cycle assessment |