Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia)

In light of one of the longest droughts in South East Queensland's in one hundred years, the Qld Labour Government announced on April 27, 2006 its intention to dam part of the Mary River at Traveston Crossing (South East Queensland). Local Mary Valley residents oppose the dam proposal due to the dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Argyroudi, Anna
Formato: Second cycle, A2E
Lenguaje:Inglés
Inglés
Publicado: 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/343/
_version_ 1855570175794872320
author Argyroudi, Anna
author_browse Argyroudi, Anna
author_facet Argyroudi, Anna
author_sort Argyroudi, Anna
collection Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
description In light of one of the longest droughts in South East Queensland's in one hundred years, the Qld Labour Government announced on April 27, 2006 its intention to dam part of the Mary River at Traveston Crossing (South East Queensland). Local Mary Valley residents oppose the dam proposal due to the dislocation of the local community in the proposed inundated area and the adverse environmental impacts as well as the inundation of primary agricultural land. Another major concern is that the unsuitable geomechanics of the proposed site (sandy and flat area for a dam) will not provide thirsty Brisbane with the “promised” water. Given the circumstances, the present research is posing two basic questions; what is the reality given by the people living in the Mary Valley after this dam proposal (an emic account) and what is the reality given by the researcher (an etic account). The research exploration has led the people to express their own constructed worldviews which involved some resource, institutional, technical, ethical and finally political dilemmas around the dam proposal. The clearly expressed dilemmas, visions and actions of the people in the Valley have emerged as the result of a learning process throughout the years-that is a learning of what to do in order to co-exist with the Mary River and why is this meaningful to the community. However, Mary Valley residents felt that their engagement to co-manage the river, as well as the indigenous values and knowledge about the river have been disregarded by the Government plannig to build a dam at Traveston.
format Second cycle, A2E
id RepoSLU343
institution Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
language Inglés
Inglés
publishDate 2009
publishDateSort 2009
record_format eprints
spelling RepoSLU3432012-04-20T14:09:08Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/343/ Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia) Argyroudi, Anna Landscape architecture Water resources and management In light of one of the longest droughts in South East Queensland's in one hundred years, the Qld Labour Government announced on April 27, 2006 its intention to dam part of the Mary River at Traveston Crossing (South East Queensland). Local Mary Valley residents oppose the dam proposal due to the dislocation of the local community in the proposed inundated area and the adverse environmental impacts as well as the inundation of primary agricultural land. Another major concern is that the unsuitable geomechanics of the proposed site (sandy and flat area for a dam) will not provide thirsty Brisbane with the “promised” water. Given the circumstances, the present research is posing two basic questions; what is the reality given by the people living in the Mary Valley after this dam proposal (an emic account) and what is the reality given by the researcher (an etic account). The research exploration has led the people to express their own constructed worldviews which involved some resource, institutional, technical, ethical and finally political dilemmas around the dam proposal. The clearly expressed dilemmas, visions and actions of the people in the Valley have emerged as the result of a learning process throughout the years-that is a learning of what to do in order to co-exist with the Mary River and why is this meaningful to the community. However, Mary Valley residents felt that their engagement to co-manage the river, as well as the indigenous values and knowledge about the river have been disregarded by the Government plannig to build a dam at Traveston. 2009-07-01 Second cycle, A2E NonPeerReviewed application/pdf eng https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/343/1/argyroudi_a_090601.pdf Argyroudi, Anna, 2009. Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia). Second cycle, A2E. Uppsala, Sweden: (NL, NJ) > Dept. of Urban and Rural Development (LTJ, LTV) > Dept. of Urban and Rural Development <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-595.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-3-5 eng
spellingShingle Landscape architecture
Water resources and management
Argyroudi, Anna
Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia)
title Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia)
title_full Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia)
title_fullStr Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia)
title_full_unstemmed Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia)
title_short Dilemmas and learning accounts around the Traveston Dam proposal on the Mary River (South East Queensland of Australia)
title_sort dilemmas and learning accounts around the traveston dam proposal on the mary river (south east queensland of australia)
topic Landscape architecture
Water resources and management
url https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/343/
https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/343/