Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers
Sweden strives for adaptive wildlife management. With the introduction of new technologies and methodologies, adaptive management must be resilient and efficient in implementing and trying these, to truly stay adaptive. One of the most widely used technologies within Swedish wildlife management is c...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Second cycle, A2E |
| Language: | Swedish Inglés |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17598/ |
| _version_ | 1855572922516635648 |
|---|---|
| author | Jaktén Langert, William |
| author_browse | Jaktén Langert, William |
| author_facet | Jaktén Langert, William |
| author_sort | Jaktén Langert, William |
| collection | Epsilon Archive for Student Projects |
| description | Sweden strives for adaptive wildlife management. With the introduction of new technologies and methodologies, adaptive management must be resilient and efficient in implementing and trying these, to truly stay adaptive. One of the most widely used technologies within Swedish wildlife management is camera traps, as they are a relatively cheap and unintrusive means of monitoring wildlife. In this report, I focus on the practical and theoretical development and implementation of camera traps. By conducting qualitative, key informant interviews with Swedish wildlife managers, I provide insight into managers’ thoughts on and experiences with implementation of camera traps specifically and new technologies and methodologies more generally, and into their views on the challenges that Swedish wildlife management may face today, and in the future. The analysis revealed concerns in communication of information, knowledge, experiences, and technology uses between involved stakeholders, as well as issues in the coordination of methodological and technological development and implementation. Efficient communication and coordination are vital in maintaining a functional approach to adaptive wildlife management with fundamental knowledge amongst all stakeholders. The adaptive management framework and practical implementation needs careful work to obtain these functions. The analysis also revealed frustration amongst wildlife managers concerning the legislation around the use of new technologies. As adaptive management is reliant on a trial-and-error approach, legislation must be adapted to allow for new tools and methods to be tried in order to meet current and future management demands. |
| format | Second cycle, A2E |
| id | RepoSLU17598 |
| institution | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| language | Swedish Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | RepoSLU175982022-03-11T02:01:01Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17598/ Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers Jaktén Langert, William Nature conservation and land resources Sweden strives for adaptive wildlife management. With the introduction of new technologies and methodologies, adaptive management must be resilient and efficient in implementing and trying these, to truly stay adaptive. One of the most widely used technologies within Swedish wildlife management is camera traps, as they are a relatively cheap and unintrusive means of monitoring wildlife. In this report, I focus on the practical and theoretical development and implementation of camera traps. By conducting qualitative, key informant interviews with Swedish wildlife managers, I provide insight into managers’ thoughts on and experiences with implementation of camera traps specifically and new technologies and methodologies more generally, and into their views on the challenges that Swedish wildlife management may face today, and in the future. The analysis revealed concerns in communication of information, knowledge, experiences, and technology uses between involved stakeholders, as well as issues in the coordination of methodological and technological development and implementation. Efficient communication and coordination are vital in maintaining a functional approach to adaptive wildlife management with fundamental knowledge amongst all stakeholders. The adaptive management framework and practical implementation needs careful work to obtain these functions. The analysis also revealed frustration amongst wildlife managers concerning the legislation around the use of new technologies. As adaptive management is reliant on a trial-and-error approach, legislation must be adapted to allow for new tools and methods to be tried in order to meet current and future management demands. 2022-03-04 Second cycle, A2E NonPeerReviewed application/pdf sv https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17598/1/Jakt%C3%A9n_L_W_220304.pdf Jaktén Langert, William, 2022. Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers : an insight into Swedish wildlife managers’ views on camera traps and other technological tools and methodologies in an adaptive wildlife management framework. Second cycle, A2E. Umeå: (S) > Dept. of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-251.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-17598 eng |
| spellingShingle | Nature conservation and land resources Jaktén Langert, William Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers |
| title | Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers |
| title_full | Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers |
| title_fullStr | Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers |
| title_short | Camera traps as seen by wildlife managers |
| title_sort | camera traps as seen by wildlife managers |
| topic | Nature conservation and land resources |
| url | https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17598/ https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17598/ |