Riparian forests

Headwaters and their adjacent riparian forests (RF) have been recognized for years for their tight interlinkage and essential ecological and biogeochemical services. Notwithstanding, headwaters in Sweden have historically been overlooked in forest management, which has led to conifer-dominated RFs w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lundqvist, Eric
Formato: Second cycle, A2E
Lenguaje:Inglés
Inglés
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17499/
_version_ 1855572906536337408
author Lundqvist, Eric
author_browse Lundqvist, Eric
author_facet Lundqvist, Eric
author_sort Lundqvist, Eric
collection Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
description Headwaters and their adjacent riparian forests (RF) have been recognized for years for their tight interlinkage and essential ecological and biogeochemical services. Notwithstanding, headwaters in Sweden have historically been overlooked in forest management, which has led to conifer-dominated RFs with simplified even-age structure. This simplified structure may not provide the same ecosystem functioning as a primary RF ecosystem, thus forest management that aims to mimic natural disturbances has been promoted as a more sustainable alternative. However, little is known about the stand characteristics of primary RFs and how they differ compared to mature production RFs along headwaters. In this thesis, I investigated the stand characteristics (i.e. tree species, tree sizes, deadwood and stream canopy cover) in five primary RFs and five mature production RFs along headwaters in Västerbotten and Västernorrland county. Measurements were conducted in six 10x10 m plots along a 110 m stream transect. The primary RF had more tree species, higher tree density, lower mean DBH, more riparian deadwood and lower mean canopy cover compared to the production RF. The primary RF followed an inverse J-shape diameter distribution, while the production RF followed a uniform bell-shaped diameter distribution. Norway spruce was the dominant tree species in both RF types. No significant difference was found on in-stream deadwood between the primary and the production RF. The presented results could aid to improve forest management to increase RFs functionality. However more research over climatic gradients and different forest types is needed before active and adaptive forest management can be applied.
format Second cycle, A2E
id RepoSLU17499
institution Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
language Inglés
Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateSort 2022
record_format eprints
spelling RepoSLU174992022-02-12T02:00:51Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17499/ Riparian forests Lundqvist, Eric Plant ecology Nature conservation and land resources Headwaters and their adjacent riparian forests (RF) have been recognized for years for their tight interlinkage and essential ecological and biogeochemical services. Notwithstanding, headwaters in Sweden have historically been overlooked in forest management, which has led to conifer-dominated RFs with simplified even-age structure. This simplified structure may not provide the same ecosystem functioning as a primary RF ecosystem, thus forest management that aims to mimic natural disturbances has been promoted as a more sustainable alternative. However, little is known about the stand characteristics of primary RFs and how they differ compared to mature production RFs along headwaters. In this thesis, I investigated the stand characteristics (i.e. tree species, tree sizes, deadwood and stream canopy cover) in five primary RFs and five mature production RFs along headwaters in Västerbotten and Västernorrland county. Measurements were conducted in six 10x10 m plots along a 110 m stream transect. The primary RF had more tree species, higher tree density, lower mean DBH, more riparian deadwood and lower mean canopy cover compared to the production RF. The primary RF followed an inverse J-shape diameter distribution, while the production RF followed a uniform bell-shaped diameter distribution. Norway spruce was the dominant tree species in both RF types. No significant difference was found on in-stream deadwood between the primary and the production RF. The presented results could aid to improve forest management to increase RFs functionality. However more research over climatic gradients and different forest types is needed before active and adaptive forest management can be applied. 2022-02-08 Second cycle, A2E NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17499/1/lundqvist_e_220208.pdf Lundqvist, Eric, 2022. Riparian forests : a comparison of tree diversity, deadwood and canopy cover between primary and production riparian forests along headwaters. Second cycle, A2E. Umeå: (S) > Dept. of Forest Ecology and Management <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-241.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-17499 eng
spellingShingle Plant ecology
Nature conservation and land resources
Lundqvist, Eric
Riparian forests
title Riparian forests
title_full Riparian forests
title_fullStr Riparian forests
title_full_unstemmed Riparian forests
title_short Riparian forests
title_sort riparian forests
topic Plant ecology
Nature conservation and land resources
url https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17499/
https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17499/