A pandemic revealing another : Colombian indigenous women in the national COVID-19 discourse

During the last years, Colombia has put an effort in formally achieving higher levels of equality in the country which is particularly visible through the National Development Plan (2018-2022). The spreading of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, magnified those inequalities that the Plan is supposed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gallisai, Francesca
Formato: H2
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: SLU/Dept. of Urban and Rural Development 2021
Materias:
Descripción
Sumario:During the last years, Colombia has put an effort in formally achieving higher levels of equality in the country which is particularly visible through the National Development Plan (2018-2022). The spreading of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, magnified those inequalities that the Plan is supposed to challenge by showing not only their ubiquity but the mechanisms through which they can be exacerbated in crises situations. By drawing on feminist postcolonial theory and implementing discourse analysis to engage with policy and public discourse that include concerns for Colombian indigenous women under the pandemic, the purpose of this study is to contribute to discussions on how politics (in this case related to the pandemic) can reinforce gendered and ethnicized oppressions. In order to develop this qualitative study, empirical material was collected from eleven written and oral sources issued by international organizations, research institutes, national and local indigenous organizations, and indigenous representative bodies. Three main problematic discourses arise from the analysis: the portraying of indigenous women as passive subjects which contrasts with the description of indigenous peoples as active in the face of the challenges brought by the pandemic; the overwhelming focus on the vulnerability of indigenous women thereby contributing to normalizing their view as powerless and voiceless, even in sources aiming to address gendered power differentials; and finally, a narrative of inclusion in decision-making processes that appears to potentially become double folded: on one hand, it can foster inclusion, on the other, if not coupled with institutional change, it can lead to the reproduction of those oppressions it aimed to challenge.