Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy

Several policies and strategies for mitigating climate changes and for enhancing our way of handling natural resources have been developed during the last decade, where the EU Bioeconomy Strategy could be seen as one example. Research and innovation (R&I) is repeatedly used within policymaking as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rådberg, Gabriella
Formato: Second cycle, A2E
Lenguaje:sueco
Inglés
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/16841/
_version_ 1855572803495919616
author Rådberg, Gabriella
author_browse Rådberg, Gabriella
author_facet Rådberg, Gabriella
author_sort Rådberg, Gabriella
collection Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
description Several policies and strategies for mitigating climate changes and for enhancing our way of handling natural resources have been developed during the last decade, where the EU Bioeconomy Strategy could be seen as one example. Research and innovation (R&I) is repeatedly used within policymaking as a tool for enabling transition into a more sustainable society and the EU Bioeconomy Strategy is no exemption. Scholars have earlier argued that R&I has turned into an uncontested concept and therefore used within policy to gain support and to bridge political disagreements. Analysing the EU Bioeconomy Strategy is important since EU policies are likely to influence other policies within the field. This thesis therefore aims to critically analyse how R&I is framed and considered in the EU Bioeconomy Strategy, what models and approaches the strategy promotes for enabling R&I-based solutions, as well as how the positive connotation of R&I in policymaking may have emerged. To do so, a critical discourse analysis in combination with a theoretical framework consisting of ecological modernization theory and the pro-innovation bias have been used. The results show that aspects such as difficulties to adapt to innovations, uneven distribution of innovations, positive effects from withdrawal of innovations and investments in already existing innovations are left out in the EU Bioeconomy Strategy. The analysis further shows that cross-sectoral cooperation and decentralized models are seen as essential for enabling R&Ibased solutions and that the ecological modernization theory could be used as an explanation for why R&I has a significant role in the EU Bioeconomy Strategy. Considering that relatively few studies have examined the role of R&I in EU bioeconomy policies from a critical point of view, the importance of this thesis lays in the opportunity to provide insights on how future policies could be developed to adopt a more comprehensive attitude towards R&I.
format Second cycle, A2E
id RepoSLU16841
institution Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
language Swedish
Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateSort 2021
record_format eprints
spelling RepoSLU168412021-06-29T01:02:37Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/16841/ Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy Rådberg, Gabriella Agricultural economics and policies Several policies and strategies for mitigating climate changes and for enhancing our way of handling natural resources have been developed during the last decade, where the EU Bioeconomy Strategy could be seen as one example. Research and innovation (R&I) is repeatedly used within policymaking as a tool for enabling transition into a more sustainable society and the EU Bioeconomy Strategy is no exemption. Scholars have earlier argued that R&I has turned into an uncontested concept and therefore used within policy to gain support and to bridge political disagreements. Analysing the EU Bioeconomy Strategy is important since EU policies are likely to influence other policies within the field. This thesis therefore aims to critically analyse how R&I is framed and considered in the EU Bioeconomy Strategy, what models and approaches the strategy promotes for enabling R&I-based solutions, as well as how the positive connotation of R&I in policymaking may have emerged. To do so, a critical discourse analysis in combination with a theoretical framework consisting of ecological modernization theory and the pro-innovation bias have been used. The results show that aspects such as difficulties to adapt to innovations, uneven distribution of innovations, positive effects from withdrawal of innovations and investments in already existing innovations are left out in the EU Bioeconomy Strategy. The analysis further shows that cross-sectoral cooperation and decentralized models are seen as essential for enabling R&Ibased solutions and that the ecological modernization theory could be used as an explanation for why R&I has a significant role in the EU Bioeconomy Strategy. Considering that relatively few studies have examined the role of R&I in EU bioeconomy policies from a critical point of view, the importance of this thesis lays in the opportunity to provide insights on how future policies could be developed to adopt a more comprehensive attitude towards R&I. 2021-06-21 Second cycle, A2E NonPeerReviewed application/pdf sv https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/16841/1/radberg_b_210621.pdf Rådberg, Gabriella, 2021. Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy : a useful solution or a political buzzword?. Second cycle, A2E. Uppsala: (NL, NJ) > Dept. of Urban and Rural Development (LTJ, LTV) > Dept. of Urban and Rural Development <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-595.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-500241 eng
spellingShingle Agricultural economics and policies
Rådberg, Gabriella
Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy
title Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy
title_full Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy
title_fullStr Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy
title_full_unstemmed Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy
title_short Research & innovation in the EU bioeconomy strategy
title_sort research & innovation in the eu bioeconomy strategy
topic Agricultural economics and policies
url https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/16841/
https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/16841/