Grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum

The main stunning methods for commercial pig production in Europe are electricity and induced hypoxia with carbon dioxide. Although electrical stunning is considered good from an animal welfare point of view, it has its drawbacks due to necessity for individual handling prior to stunning as well as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brattlund Hellgren, Rebecka
Formato: M2
Lenguaje:sueco
Inglés
Publicado: SLU/Dept. of Animal Environment and Health (until 231231) 2019
Materias:
_version_ 1855572523702288384
author Brattlund Hellgren, Rebecka
author_browse Brattlund Hellgren, Rebecka
author_facet Brattlund Hellgren, Rebecka
author_sort Brattlund Hellgren, Rebecka
collection Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
description The main stunning methods for commercial pig production in Europe are electricity and induced hypoxia with carbon dioxide. Although electrical stunning is considered good from an animal welfare point of view, it has its drawbacks due to necessity for individual handling prior to stunning as well as being less effective than carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide has on the other hand been criticized for inducing pain and discomfort before stunning is completed. This study was conducted as part of a project with an overall aim to get the use of nitrogen foam approved according to the EU legislation for stunning of pigs at slaughter. The aim of the present study was to investigate the behavioral response of pigs exposed to air-filled and nitrogen-filled foam. Results showed that foam induces responses such as exploratory behavior towards the foam and stunning box roof as well as escape attempts towards the roof. Other behavioral responses did not show any relevant differences between air-filled foam and nitrogen-filled foam. However, the frequency of performed behaviors of pigs in nitrogen-filled foam declined right before loss of posture. In order to conclude that the method is less aversive than carbon dioxide more studies on pig behavior in this environment is necessary, as well as studies on how the foam is perceived when in contact with eyes and snout, or when introduced to a group of pigs. This may contribute to a better understanding of how effective nitrogen-filled foam is as a stunning agent, and in the long run aid the improvement of animal welfare at slaughter.
format M2
id RepoSLU15102
institution Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
language swe
Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher SLU/Dept. of Animal Environment and Health (until 231231)
publisherStr SLU/Dept. of Animal Environment and Health (until 231231)
record_format eprints
spelling RepoSLU151022019-10-15T01:01:37Z Grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum Pig behavior in a stunning box with air filled foam or nitrogen filled foam Brattlund Hellgren, Rebecka pig stunning nitrogen foam behavior loss of posture The main stunning methods for commercial pig production in Europe are electricity and induced hypoxia with carbon dioxide. Although electrical stunning is considered good from an animal welfare point of view, it has its drawbacks due to necessity for individual handling prior to stunning as well as being less effective than carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide has on the other hand been criticized for inducing pain and discomfort before stunning is completed. This study was conducted as part of a project with an overall aim to get the use of nitrogen foam approved according to the EU legislation for stunning of pigs at slaughter. The aim of the present study was to investigate the behavioral response of pigs exposed to air-filled and nitrogen-filled foam. Results showed that foam induces responses such as exploratory behavior towards the foam and stunning box roof as well as escape attempts towards the roof. Other behavioral responses did not show any relevant differences between air-filled foam and nitrogen-filled foam. However, the frequency of performed behaviors of pigs in nitrogen-filled foam declined right before loss of posture. In order to conclude that the method is less aversive than carbon dioxide more studies on pig behavior in this environment is necessary, as well as studies on how the foam is perceived when in contact with eyes and snout, or when introduced to a group of pigs. This may contribute to a better understanding of how effective nitrogen-filled foam is as a stunning agent, and in the long run aid the improvement of animal welfare at slaughter. SLU/Dept. of Animal Environment and Health (until 231231) 2019 M2 swe eng https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/15102/
spellingShingle pig
stunning
nitrogen
foam
behavior
loss of posture
Brattlund Hellgren, Rebecka
Grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum
title Grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum
title_full Grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum
title_fullStr Grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum
title_full_unstemmed Grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum
title_short Grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum
title_sort grisars beteende i bedövningsbox med luftskum eller kvävgasskum
topic pig
stunning
nitrogen
foam
behavior
loss of posture