Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model

Romanian forests account 27.5% of total area and has quite even shares of ownership, 48.5 % state forests and 51.5% private forests. From a total of ~7 million hectares, 3.2 million hectares are state forests managed by State forest administration, 3.8 mil. hectares are managed by private owners or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hapa, Mihai-Ionut
Formato: Second cycle, A2E
Lenguaje:sueco
Inglés
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/14870/
_version_ 1855572483517710336
author Hapa, Mihai-Ionut
author_browse Hapa, Mihai-Ionut
author_facet Hapa, Mihai-Ionut
author_sort Hapa, Mihai-Ionut
collection Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
description Romanian forests account 27.5% of total area and has quite even shares of ownership, 48.5 % state forests and 51.5% private forests. From a total of ~7 million hectares, 3.2 million hectares are state forests managed by State forest administration, 3.8 mil. hectares are managed by private owners or territorial administrative units. This research focuses on the forest policy programs in the contemporaneous context by a performance assessment of the state forest institutions fulfillment of their policy goals. To this end, the 3L Model was using the criteria and indicators approach combined with empirical data from the field (interviews and questionnaires) and available documents, reports, laws etc. The results identify discrepancies between what is on paper and the reality regarding the implementation of forest policy goals, especially regarding cost efficiency of sustained forest stands, as the forests are sustainably managed but with high costs due to lack of forest road infrastructure. Moreover, the forest representation status is clearly challenged, more institutions aspire for the representation of interests in forest which leads to conflicts and bad decision-making. Whilst the state forest administration performance is average, the state authority performance in forestry is relatively low which implies that strengthening of law enforcement is a must in order to mitigate illegal activities in forests and secure property rights protection. A shift towards activating the state forest institutions should be performed by involving all actors in the forest sector and improve the forest policy context through shared representation of the speaker/mediator role. Key words: Romanian forest policy, 3L Model, state forest institutions, management tasks, authority tasks, criteria and indictors, performance evaluation, forest policy.
format Second cycle, A2E
id RepoSLU14870
institution Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
language Swedish
Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
record_format eprints
spelling RepoSLU148702019-09-03T01:02:21Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/14870/ Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model Hapa, Mihai-Ionut Forestry - General aspects Romanian forests account 27.5% of total area and has quite even shares of ownership, 48.5 % state forests and 51.5% private forests. From a total of ~7 million hectares, 3.2 million hectares are state forests managed by State forest administration, 3.8 mil. hectares are managed by private owners or territorial administrative units. This research focuses on the forest policy programs in the contemporaneous context by a performance assessment of the state forest institutions fulfillment of their policy goals. To this end, the 3L Model was using the criteria and indicators approach combined with empirical data from the field (interviews and questionnaires) and available documents, reports, laws etc. The results identify discrepancies between what is on paper and the reality regarding the implementation of forest policy goals, especially regarding cost efficiency of sustained forest stands, as the forests are sustainably managed but with high costs due to lack of forest road infrastructure. Moreover, the forest representation status is clearly challenged, more institutions aspire for the representation of interests in forest which leads to conflicts and bad decision-making. Whilst the state forest administration performance is average, the state authority performance in forestry is relatively low which implies that strengthening of law enforcement is a must in order to mitigate illegal activities in forests and secure property rights protection. A shift towards activating the state forest institutions should be performed by involving all actors in the forest sector and improve the forest policy context through shared representation of the speaker/mediator role. Key words: Romanian forest policy, 3L Model, state forest institutions, management tasks, authority tasks, criteria and indictors, performance evaluation, forest policy. 2019-08-15 Second cycle, A2E NonPeerReviewed application/pdf sv https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/14870/17/hapa_m_%20190815.pdf Hapa, Mihai-Ionut, 2019. Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model. Second cycle, A2E. Alnarp: (S) > Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-295.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-10801 eng
spellingShingle Forestry - General aspects
Hapa, Mihai-Ionut
Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model
title Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model
title_full Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model
title_fullStr Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model
title_short Evaluation of state forest institutions in Romania based on the 3L model
title_sort evaluation of state forest institutions in romania based on the 3l model
topic Forestry - General aspects
url https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/14870/
https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/14870/