Att förhålla sig till den nära historien
This thesis concerns the term contemporary history and its role in landscape architecture. Today's contemporary history is defined as the planning and architecture connected to the 60s and 70s, in Sweden carried out as a large scale planning project called "Miljonprogrammet", which set out to build...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Otro |
| Lenguaje: | sueco sueco |
| Publicado: |
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/12692/ |
| _version_ | 1855572113588486144 |
|---|---|
| author | Sunding, Anna |
| author_browse | Sunding, Anna |
| author_facet | Sunding, Anna |
| author_sort | Sunding, Anna |
| collection | Epsilon Archive for Student Projects |
| description | This thesis concerns the term contemporary history and its role in landscape architecture. Today's contemporary history is defined as the planning and architecture connected to the 60s and 70s, in Sweden carried out as a large scale planning project called "Miljonprogrammet", which set out to build one million new residences in ten years.
Initially, the term contemporary history and its complex of problem are examined.
To deepen the picture of today's situation, a historical review has been made, starting in early 1900s ending in 2000s concerning how different planning and architectural influences has varied through the years. A rendering concerning how the view of the contemporary history has been and if there are structures and opinions repeating over time.
The result of the review is that not many are neutral in the depiction of the 60s and 70s planning and architecture. There seems to be a bias that is not always in close connection to reality. This is partly explained by the picture that media has contributed to since these areas where newly built; a consistently negative picture that gradually has become the truth.
In the research, a pendulum effect has also been identified concerning the ideals of planning and architecture. The shift has been between a traditional view which emphasise historical anchoring and a modern view that stresses new materials and building techniques. Depending on which view is the current, the other is being criticised and adjusted in greater or lesser extent.
Deriving from this, a discussion on how the areas of the "Miljonprogram" can be seen in present day not as a mistake in planning and architectural history, but rather a cultural-historical event that demands to be evaluated according to its on premises. Further, the discussion shows how we in many ways reason as in the 60s where you tried to correct what was considered mistakes, and create a new timeless style by removing or recreating areas that doesn't fit the picture.
Finally a discussion is held on how it is possible to deepen the understanding on the described pendulum effect by introducing the term contemporary history in the field of landscape architecture and by that create a more sustainable view on urban planning. |
| format | Otro |
| id | RepoSLU12692 |
| institution | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| language | Swedish swe |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | RepoSLU126922017-10-20T11:47:37Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/12692/ Att förhålla sig till den nära historien Sunding, Anna Landscape Architecture (until 121231) Landscape architecture This thesis concerns the term contemporary history and its role in landscape architecture. Today's contemporary history is defined as the planning and architecture connected to the 60s and 70s, in Sweden carried out as a large scale planning project called "Miljonprogrammet", which set out to build one million new residences in ten years. Initially, the term contemporary history and its complex of problem are examined. To deepen the picture of today's situation, a historical review has been made, starting in early 1900s ending in 2000s concerning how different planning and architectural influences has varied through the years. A rendering concerning how the view of the contemporary history has been and if there are structures and opinions repeating over time. The result of the review is that not many are neutral in the depiction of the 60s and 70s planning and architecture. There seems to be a bias that is not always in close connection to reality. This is partly explained by the picture that media has contributed to since these areas where newly built; a consistently negative picture that gradually has become the truth. In the research, a pendulum effect has also been identified concerning the ideals of planning and architecture. The shift has been between a traditional view which emphasise historical anchoring and a modern view that stresses new materials and building techniques. Depending on which view is the current, the other is being criticised and adjusted in greater or lesser extent. Deriving from this, a discussion on how the areas of the "Miljonprogram" can be seen in present day not as a mistake in planning and architectural history, but rather a cultural-historical event that demands to be evaluated according to its on premises. Further, the discussion shows how we in many ways reason as in the 60s where you tried to correct what was considered mistakes, and create a new timeless style by removing or recreating areas that doesn't fit the picture. Finally a discussion is held on how it is possible to deepen the understanding on the described pendulum effect by introducing the term contemporary history in the field of landscape architecture and by that create a more sustainable view on urban planning. I den här uppsatsen har begreppet samtidshistoria och dess koppling till landskapsarkitekturen undersökts. Dagens samtidshistoria definieras som 60- och 70-talet, dess planering och arkitektur, framförallt miljonprogrammet. Inledningsvis har termen samtidshistoria och dess problematik undersökts. För att fördjupa förståelsen om dagens situation har en historisk genomgång gjorts från 1900-talets början fram till 2000-talet gällande hur planeringsgrepp och influenser har följt på varandra. Dessutom har en tolkning skett av hur man har sett på sin nära historia och om det finns övergripande mönster i detta som upprepar sig över tid. Resultatet av den historiska undersökningen är att få är neutrala i sin beskrivning av 60- och 70-talet. Det verkar finnas en negativ schablon som inte stämmer överens med verkligheten. Detta förklaras delvis på hur media har framstället dessa områden sedan nybyggnadsstadiet; hur en genomgående negativ vinkling efterhand har antagits vara den objektiva sanningen. Dessutom har en typ av pendelverkan identifierats där det rådande synsättet gällande planerings- och arkitekturideal har växlat mellan en traditionell stil som betonar historisk förankring och en modern stil som lägger vikten vid nya material och tekniker. Beroende på vilket synsätt som råder kritiseras och åtgärdas den andra typen enligt gällande ideal i större eller mindre omfattning. Ur detta diskuteras hur miljonprogrammets områden kan gå från att med dagens ögon ses som ett arkitektoniskt och planeringsmässigt misstag till en kulturhistorisk händelse som har sina egna premisser och kräver en bedömning utifrån dessa. Det visas också hur man på många sätt resonerar idag som man gjorde på 60-talet genom att försöka rätta till tidigare misstag och skapa en ny tidlös eller historiskt mer korrekt stil genom att ta bort och göra om avvikande områden. Avslutningsvis diskuteras hur man genom att föra in begreppet samtidshistoria i landskapsarkitekturen kan utveckla en förståelse för problematiken kring denna pendelverkan och på så sätt skapa ett mer långsiktigt förhållningssätt till stadsplanering. 2009-02-26 Other NonPeerReviewed application/pdf sv https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/12692/1/sunding_a_171020.pdf Sunding, Anna, 2009. Att förhålla sig till den nära historien : och planera för den avlägsna framtiden. UNSPECIFIED, Alnarp. Alnarp: (LTJ, LTV) > Dept. Of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/LMNR=3A644.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-8088 swe |
| spellingShingle | Landscape Architecture (until 121231) Landscape architecture Sunding, Anna Att förhålla sig till den nära historien |
| title | Att förhålla sig till den nära historien |
| title_full | Att förhålla sig till den nära historien |
| title_fullStr | Att förhålla sig till den nära historien |
| title_full_unstemmed | Att förhålla sig till den nära historien |
| title_short | Att förhålla sig till den nära historien |
| title_sort | att förhålla sig till den nära historien |
| topic | Landscape Architecture (until 121231) Landscape architecture |
| url | https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/12692/ https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/12692/ |