Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård
I have through a case study looked on a milkingfarm in Dalarna and been counting on what it would cost to increase the silagestorage. Today they have to little capacity on the existing towersilo because they built a bigger farm with more cows. The reason is that two families decided to start havi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Otro |
| Language: | Swedish Swedish |
| Published: |
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/11602/ |
| _version_ | 1855571903945637888 |
|---|---|
| author | Roos, Erik |
| author_browse | Roos, Erik |
| author_facet | Roos, Erik |
| author_sort | Roos, Erik |
| collection | Epsilon Archive for Student Projects |
| description | I have through a case study looked on a milkingfarm in Dalarna and been counting on
what it would cost to increase the silagestorage. Today they have to little capacity on the
existing towersilo because they built a bigger farm with more cows. The reason is that
two families decided to start having the production on one farm together and moved all
animals from one of the farms to the other farm. So for that reason I have looked on the
costs to build a new towersilo or levelsilo.
The goal has been not only to look at the buildingcost but also which operatingcost that
is included with the different alternatives. I have taken tenders from two different
towersilocompany, Bjurenwall and Svenska Neuero and taken tenders from Abetong for
a levelsilo with roof and one without roof.
The overall feed requirements on the farm is on 240 tonnes dry extract and the old
towersilo hold 110 tonnes dry extract so the need for a new foundation is on 130 tonnes
dry extract.
I have through cost estimate been counting on the specific buildingcost for each
buildingaltenative. Then I have found out which different operatingcost the different
buildingalternative brings. Levelsiloalternative demands a traktor with driver who
comes and collect forage and that costs money. In towersiloalternative it is an electric
powercost for fans and fillemtymachine and a staffcost to start the machine and a certain
servicing like re-greasing the plate and layer etc.
In the casestudy it have come to see that the result was that Bjurenvall towersilo had the
most cheap yearcost on building and operatingcost on 62 191 SEK per year. On second
place was Abetongs Levelsilo without roof and it costs 92 040 SEK per year. On the
third place was Svensk Neueros towersilo that costs 103 163 SEK per year. Most
expensive was it with Abetongs plansilo with roof that costs 117 331 SEK per year.
An important conclusion is that it is important not to only look at the buildingcosts but
also try to get an understanding of which operatingcost that arise with different systems.
I have also made a literaturstudy concerning statistics on how pastureproduktion looks
in Sweden. How big harvest it is in different places in the country and which different
harvestmethod that is used. And how different harvestmethod affect to dry extract losses
in the crop. This is to get a little insight how the pasture is used in Sweden. |
| format | Otro |
| id | RepoSLU11602 |
| institution | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| language | Swedish swe |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publishDateSort | 2005 |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | RepoSLU116022017-10-02T11:42:40Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/11602/ Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård Roos, Erik Feed processing and preservation Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Science (until 2013) I have through a case study looked on a milkingfarm in Dalarna and been counting on what it would cost to increase the silagestorage. Today they have to little capacity on the existing towersilo because they built a bigger farm with more cows. The reason is that two families decided to start having the production on one farm together and moved all animals from one of the farms to the other farm. So for that reason I have looked on the costs to build a new towersilo or levelsilo. The goal has been not only to look at the buildingcost but also which operatingcost that is included with the different alternatives. I have taken tenders from two different towersilocompany, Bjurenwall and Svenska Neuero and taken tenders from Abetong for a levelsilo with roof and one without roof. The overall feed requirements on the farm is on 240 tonnes dry extract and the old towersilo hold 110 tonnes dry extract so the need for a new foundation is on 130 tonnes dry extract. I have through cost estimate been counting on the specific buildingcost for each buildingaltenative. Then I have found out which different operatingcost the different buildingalternative brings. Levelsiloalternative demands a traktor with driver who comes and collect forage and that costs money. In towersiloalternative it is an electric powercost for fans and fillemtymachine and a staffcost to start the machine and a certain servicing like re-greasing the plate and layer etc. In the casestudy it have come to see that the result was that Bjurenvall towersilo had the most cheap yearcost on building and operatingcost on 62 191 SEK per year. On second place was Abetongs Levelsilo without roof and it costs 92 040 SEK per year. On the third place was Svensk Neueros towersilo that costs 103 163 SEK per year. Most expensive was it with Abetongs plansilo with roof that costs 117 331 SEK per year. An important conclusion is that it is important not to only look at the buildingcosts but also try to get an understanding of which operatingcost that arise with different systems. I have also made a literaturstudy concerning statistics on how pastureproduktion looks in Sweden. How big harvest it is in different places in the country and which different harvestmethod that is used. And how different harvestmethod affect to dry extract losses in the crop. This is to get a little insight how the pasture is used in Sweden. Jag har genom en fallstudie tittat på en mjölkgård i Dalarna och räknat på vad det kan kosta att bygga ut grovfoderlagringen. Idag har man för liten kapacitet på den befintliga tornsilon. Anledningen är att man byggt ut ladugården på grund av att två familjer slagit ihop sin produktion och flyttat alla djur till en av gårdarna. Därför har jag tittat på vad det skulle bli för kostnader för att bygga ny tornsilo eller plansilo. Målet har varit att inte bara se på byggkostnaderna, utan också vilka driftskostnader som medföljer med de olika alternativen. Jag har tagit in offerter från två olika tornsiloföretag, Bjurenwall och Svenska Neuero, och tagit in offerter från Abetong för en plansilo med tak och en utan tak. Det totala grovfoderbehovet på gården ligger på 240 ton ts. Den gamla tornsilon rymmer 110 ton ts, så behovet för en ny anläggning ligger på 130 ton ts. Jag har genom bidragskalkyler räknat fram en specifik byggkostnad för varje byggalternativ. Sedan har jag tagit reda på vilka olika driftskostnader som de olika byggalternativen medför. Plansiloalternativet kräver en traktor med förare som kommer och hämtar foder med en blockuttagare och medför en kostnad. I tornsiloalternativen är det en elkostnad för fläktar och fylltömmare och en personalkostnad för att starta tömningen samt ett visst underhåll för smörjning av tallrikar och lager etc. I fallstudien så framgår det att Bjurenvall tornsilo hade den billigaste årskostnaden på bygg och driftskostnader på 62 191 kr per år. Näst billigast var Abetong plansilo utan tak som kostade 92 040 kr per år. Näst dyrast var Svenska Neuero silotorn som kostade 103 163 kr per år, dyrast var Abetong plansilo med tak som kostade 117 331 kr per år. En viktig slutsats är att det är viktigt att man inte stirrar sig blind på enbart byggkostnaderna, utan man måste också försöka få en uppfattning om vilka driftskostnader som uppkommer vid olika system. Jag har även utfört en mindre litteraturstudie angående statistik på hur vallproduktionen ser ut i Sverige, på hur stora skördarna är, vilka olika bärgningsmetoder som används samt hur olika bärgningsmetoder påverkar ts-förluster i grödan. Detta för att få en liten inblick hur slåttervallen används i Sverige. 2005-11-30 Other NonPeerReviewed application/pdf sv https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/11602/1/roos_e_171002.pdf Roos, Erik, 2005. Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård. UNSPECIFIED, Alnarp. Alnarp: (LTJ, LTV) > Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101) <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-644.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-7368 swe |
| spellingShingle | Feed processing and preservation Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Science (until 2013) Roos, Erik Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård |
| title | Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård |
| title_full | Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård |
| title_fullStr | Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård |
| title_short | Fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård |
| title_sort | fallstudie av kostnader i tornsilo och plansilosystem på en mjölkgård |
| topic | Feed processing and preservation Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Science (until 2013) |
| url | https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/11602/ https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/11602/ |