Integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall
Today there is an increasing market for businesses concerning horses, and since we are already running such establishments we sort of speak already have a finger in the pie. Due tothe increasing competition and demands, new and more practical constructions have become a necessity. In doing this...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | L3 |
| Lenguaje: | sueco Inglés |
| Publicado: |
SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101)
2004
|
| Materias: |
| _version_ | 1855571885955219456 |
|---|---|
| author | Jakobsson, Mathias |
| author_browse | Jakobsson, Mathias |
| author_facet | Jakobsson, Mathias |
| author_sort | Jakobsson, Mathias |
| collection | Epsilon Archive for Student Projects |
| description | Today there is an increasing market for businesses concerning horses, and since we are already running such establishments we sort of speak already have a finger in the pie. Due tothe increasing competition and demands, new and more practical constructions have become a necessity.
In doing this project I wanted to make a comparison between having a stable integrated with a manege and having both constructions kept separate. I wanted to compare different layout and make an estimate of costs to see which solution would be less expensive and better with regard to working environment. I will further also deal with different ventilation-systems andlight transmissions.
An advantage of building a stable integrated with a manege is that the costs are somewhat lower than by building both of the constructions separately. The reason to why the costs are lower is due to the fact that both walls and ceilings are used with, which would be used as supporting parts of the establishment anyway. You save a hole gable wall, and have the possibility to use the width of the building. Naturally there would be an increased expenditure for each extra meter being built with 26 meters roof trusses compared to building with 10 meters roof trusses. The total area of both the floor and ceiling will be somewhat lower in an integrated building.
Keeping both buildings separately show clear advantages regarding light transmission and the ventilation of natural air. The light transmission and ventilation can be controlled manually by pushing a button which in turn manages opening and closing of windows in ridge. When the rigde openings are open almost no condensation is accumulated in the stable and thus many contagious diseases can be controlled. The stable will further be lighter and more spacious. I will also lower the consumption of electricity since I will not need any extra light during the days nor will I need any fans to run the ventilation.
With regard to both of these solutions I would bare the extra expense of building a stable and manege separately, since I believe that the advantages are greater offer more practical solutions in the long run. |
| format | L3 |
| id | RepoSLU11507 |
| institution | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| language | swe Inglés |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101) |
| publisherStr | SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101) |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | RepoSLU115072017-10-03T12:01:24Z Integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall Jakobsson, Mathias ridhus stall hästar ventilation Today there is an increasing market for businesses concerning horses, and since we are already running such establishments we sort of speak already have a finger in the pie. Due tothe increasing competition and demands, new and more practical constructions have become a necessity. In doing this project I wanted to make a comparison between having a stable integrated with a manege and having both constructions kept separate. I wanted to compare different layout and make an estimate of costs to see which solution would be less expensive and better with regard to working environment. I will further also deal with different ventilation-systems andlight transmissions. An advantage of building a stable integrated with a manege is that the costs are somewhat lower than by building both of the constructions separately. The reason to why the costs are lower is due to the fact that both walls and ceilings are used with, which would be used as supporting parts of the establishment anyway. You save a hole gable wall, and have the possibility to use the width of the building. Naturally there would be an increased expenditure for each extra meter being built with 26 meters roof trusses compared to building with 10 meters roof trusses. The total area of both the floor and ceiling will be somewhat lower in an integrated building. Keeping both buildings separately show clear advantages regarding light transmission and the ventilation of natural air. The light transmission and ventilation can be controlled manually by pushing a button which in turn manages opening and closing of windows in ridge. When the rigde openings are open almost no condensation is accumulated in the stable and thus many contagious diseases can be controlled. The stable will further be lighter and more spacious. I will also lower the consumption of electricity since I will not need any extra light during the days nor will I need any fans to run the ventilation. With regard to both of these solutions I would bare the extra expense of building a stable and manege separately, since I believe that the advantages are greater offer more practical solutions in the long run. Nuförtiden finns det en växande marknad inom hästbranschen. Konkurrensen och kraven ökar hela tiden, vilket gör att man måste ha nya och praktiska anläggningar. I detta arbete görs en jämförelse mellan en integrerad stall- och ridhusanläggning och ett stall och ridhus var för sig. Jämförelsen gäller olika planlösningar och kostnadsberäkningar för att se vilken löning som är billigast och bäst ur arbetsmiljösynpunkt. En fördel med att bygga stall och ridhus integrerat är att kostnaderna sjunker 5-7% jämfört med de separat byggda husen. Anledningen till att det blir något billigare är att man utnyttjar både väggar och tak som ändå skulle användas som bärande del av huset. Man sparar en hel gavelsida och man kan utnyttja bredden på byggnaden. Givetvis får man en ökad kostnad per meter längre byggnad man bygger med 26 meters takstolar jämfört med att bygga med 10 meters takstolar. Den totala golvytan och takytan blir något mindre i den integrerade byggn Det separata stallet har en fördel då det ger större förutsättningar för ett ljust och luftigt stall genom parallelltak, ljusinsläpp genom transparanta takluckor och naturlig ventilation. Ventilation kan skötas manuellt genom att man trycker på en knapp som i sin tur sköter öppning och stängning av luckorna i nocken. När nockventilationen är öppen är risken för kondens i stallet liten och på så sätt minimerar du också fuktskador och viss bakterietillväxt. Jag minskar också elförbrukningen markant genom att jag inte behöver ha någon belysning på dagen eller några fläktar igång som ska sköta till- och frånluft. Utifrån dessa båda lösningar skulle jag ta merkostnaden för att bygga stall och ridhus var för sig, då jag tror att de övriga fördelarna väger tyngre och är mera praktiska i det långa loppet. SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101) 2004 L3 swe eng https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/11507/ |
| spellingShingle | ridhus stall hästar ventilation Jakobsson, Mathias Integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall |
| title | Integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall |
| title_full | Integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall |
| title_fullStr | Integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall |
| title_full_unstemmed | Integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall |
| title_short | Integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall |
| title_sort | integrerad hästanläggning : ridhus/stall |
| topic | ridhus stall hästar ventilation |