Utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning
The purpose of this report was to compare two different options for expanding of an existing pig farm. For the time being there are low prices within the agricultural market of pig production, and it is interesting to see if it is worth expanding or not. The two different options this report is b...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | L3 |
| Lenguaje: | sueco Inglés |
| Publicado: |
SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101)
2004
|
| Materias: |
| _version_ | 1855571882351263744 |
|---|---|
| author | Johansson, Christian |
| author_browse | Johansson, Christian |
| author_facet | Johansson, Christian |
| author_sort | Johansson, Christian |
| collection | Epsilon Archive for Student Projects |
| description | The purpose of this report was to compare two different options for expanding of an
existing pig farm. For the time being there are low prices within the agricultural market
of pig production, and it is interesting to see if it is worth expanding or not.
The two different options this report is based on are: expanding from a herd with 50
sows in breeding gilt production to a herd with 100 sows in breeding gilt production
(option 1), or expanding to a herd with 140 sows in breeding gilt production (option 2).
The number of pregnant gilts produced per year will stay the same for both alternatives;
about 300 pregnant gilts per year. The rest of the breeding gilts will be sold at a weight
of 25 kg. The pigs that are not sold as breeding gilts (e.g. castrates, and female pigs that
are too small or that have disorders) will be kept on the farm as growing-finishing pigs
until 120 kg of live weight, and then sold to the slaughter house.
By using the existing buildings, even after the expanding, the investment costs, and
thereby costs for housing, were kept as low as possible. The economic result was 121,
435 SEK per year for an increase to 100 sows, and 85, 302 SEK per year for an increase
to 140 sows. It was concluded that option 1 is the most appropriate choice economically.
With option 1 there is no need to employ any more staff and less grain has to be bought
for own feedstuff production as compared to option 2. Another advantage of option 1, as
compared to option 2, is the lower demand of straw and the lower demand of land for
spreading the manure. |
| format | L3 |
| id | RepoSLU11487 |
| institution | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| language | swe Inglés |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101) |
| publisherStr | SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101) |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | RepoSLU114872017-10-04T10:46:24Z Utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning Options for expanding a pig farm Johansson, Christian grisproduktion byggnader The purpose of this report was to compare two different options for expanding of an existing pig farm. For the time being there are low prices within the agricultural market of pig production, and it is interesting to see if it is worth expanding or not. The two different options this report is based on are: expanding from a herd with 50 sows in breeding gilt production to a herd with 100 sows in breeding gilt production (option 1), or expanding to a herd with 140 sows in breeding gilt production (option 2). The number of pregnant gilts produced per year will stay the same for both alternatives; about 300 pregnant gilts per year. The rest of the breeding gilts will be sold at a weight of 25 kg. The pigs that are not sold as breeding gilts (e.g. castrates, and female pigs that are too small or that have disorders) will be kept on the farm as growing-finishing pigs until 120 kg of live weight, and then sold to the slaughter house. By using the existing buildings, even after the expanding, the investment costs, and thereby costs for housing, were kept as low as possible. The economic result was 121, 435 SEK per year for an increase to 100 sows, and 85, 302 SEK per year for an increase to 140 sows. It was concluded that option 1 is the most appropriate choice economically. With option 1 there is no need to employ any more staff and less grain has to be bought for own feedstuff production as compared to option 2. Another advantage of option 1, as compared to option 2, is the lower demand of straw and the lower demand of land for spreading the manure. Syftet med detta arbete var att jämföra två olika utbyggnadsalternativ till en befintlig grisbesättning. I dessa tider med låga priser på grissidan är det intressant att se om det är lönsamt att bygga ut eller inte. De två olika alternativen som jag har utgått ifrån är utbyggnad från 50 suggor i gyltproduktion till 100 respektive 140 suggor i gyltproduktion. Andelen dräktiga gyltor som produceras kommer att vara konstant för alla alternativ, cirka 300 st/år. Resterande avelsdjur kommer att säljas som gyltämne och de grisar som inte går till avel föds upp till slakt. Alla de gamla stallarna kommer att användas för att få ner byggkostnaden. Det ekonomiska resultatet för de båda alternativen var 121 435 kr/år för en utbyggnad till 100 suggor, 85 302 kr/år för en utbyggnad till 140 suggor. Detta visade att alternativ 1 är lämpligast för gården ekonomiskt sett. Men det finns även andra faktorer som gör att alternativ 1 passar bra. Det behövs ingen nyanställning av personal och det behövs inte köpas in så mycket spannmål för att kunna producera eget foder. En annan fördel är att det inte krävs så stor halmåtgång och spridningsareal. SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101) 2004 L3 swe eng https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/11487/ |
| spellingShingle | grisproduktion byggnader Johansson, Christian Utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning |
| title | Utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning |
| title_full | Utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning |
| title_fullStr | Utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning |
| title_full_unstemmed | Utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning |
| title_short | Utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning |
| title_sort | utvecklingsalternativ för grisbesättning |
| topic | grisproduktion byggnader |