Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål
Today there is a limited demand for quality certified cereal in Sweden. The demand can in the future increase and become a requirement for the entire market. Since the first of January 2005, grain producers in Sweden are food producers and traceability is important for the food industry. It is possi...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Otro |
| Lenguaje: | sueco sueco |
| Publicado: |
2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/10931/ |
| _version_ | 1855571777586987008 |
|---|---|
| author | Tunemar, Arvid |
| author_browse | Tunemar, Arvid |
| author_facet | Tunemar, Arvid |
| author_sort | Tunemar, Arvid |
| collection | Epsilon Archive for Student Projects |
| description | Today there is a limited demand for quality certified cereal in Sweden. The demand can in the future increase and become a requirement for the entire market. Since the first of January 2005, grain producers in Sweden are food producers and traceability is important for the food industry. It is possible for grain producers to certify the productions under the certification IP SIGILL. The purpose of this essay is to explore why some grain producers continue to be certified while other producers end the IP SIGILL certification.
The study was conducted by performing qualitative interviews of grain farmers who produce grain by IP SIGILL, grain producers who previously produced cereal by IP SIGILL and staff members at Svenskt Sigill.
The conclusions of the study are summarized it three positive and three negative aspects that may have affected grain producers attitude to stay certified by IP SIGILL.
Positive aspects:
• Grain producers can show that they stand for development, that they impose higher demands on the production than uncertified producers and that they want to pursue the development of grain production in Sweden by certify the production by IP SIGILL.
• Grain productions that are certified by IP SIGILL become updated due to the law regulations in Sweden which can lead to a lower risk of violating these laws.
• All of the interviewed grain producers have a positive attitude towards IP SIGILL and they believe that the certification have had a positive impact on the productions.
Negative aspects:
• The additional payment that the certified grain producers received have, over time, been reduced and are in some cases gone which reduced the revenue for the producers to certify by IP SIGILL.
• The producers haven't achieved what they expected by the IP SIGILL certification which may have reduced the motivation to be certified.
• The communication between Svenskt Sigill and the certified grain producers have not conveyed the benefits that the production can achieve by certify the productions by the certification IP SIGILL.
In the end of this essay proposals are discussed which could hopefully affect the grain producers to produce certified grain in accordance with IP SIGILL. |
| format | Otro |
| id | RepoSLU10931 |
| institution | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| language | Swedish swe |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | RepoSLU109312017-09-20T11:34:52Z https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/10931/ Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål Tunemar, Arvid Handling, transport, storage and protection of agricultural products Today there is a limited demand for quality certified cereal in Sweden. The demand can in the future increase and become a requirement for the entire market. Since the first of January 2005, grain producers in Sweden are food producers and traceability is important for the food industry. It is possible for grain producers to certify the productions under the certification IP SIGILL. The purpose of this essay is to explore why some grain producers continue to be certified while other producers end the IP SIGILL certification. The study was conducted by performing qualitative interviews of grain farmers who produce grain by IP SIGILL, grain producers who previously produced cereal by IP SIGILL and staff members at Svenskt Sigill. The conclusions of the study are summarized it three positive and three negative aspects that may have affected grain producers attitude to stay certified by IP SIGILL. Positive aspects: • Grain producers can show that they stand for development, that they impose higher demands on the production than uncertified producers and that they want to pursue the development of grain production in Sweden by certify the production by IP SIGILL. • Grain productions that are certified by IP SIGILL become updated due to the law regulations in Sweden which can lead to a lower risk of violating these laws. • All of the interviewed grain producers have a positive attitude towards IP SIGILL and they believe that the certification have had a positive impact on the productions. Negative aspects: • The additional payment that the certified grain producers received have, over time, been reduced and are in some cases gone which reduced the revenue for the producers to certify by IP SIGILL. • The producers haven't achieved what they expected by the IP SIGILL certification which may have reduced the motivation to be certified. • The communication between Svenskt Sigill and the certified grain producers have not conveyed the benefits that the production can achieve by certify the productions by the certification IP SIGILL. In the end of this essay proposals are discussed which could hopefully affect the grain producers to produce certified grain in accordance with IP SIGILL. Kvalitetscertifierad spannmål efterfrågas i viss omfattning av den svenska handeln. I framtiden kan efterfrågan komma att öka och bli ett krav från hela marknaden. Från och med den första januari 2005 räknas spannmålsproducenter i Sverige som livsmedelsproducenter och livsmedelssektorn anser att spårbarheten är viktig. För spannmålsproducenter är det möjligt att kvalitetscertifiera spannmål enligt certifieringen IP SIGILL. Syftet med denna uppsats är att undersöka varför vissa spannmålsproducenter fortsätter att vara certifierade medan andra producenter lämnar certifieringen IP SIGILL. Studien genomfördes med kvalitativa intervjuer av spannmålsproducenter som idag producerar spannmål enligt IP SIGILL, spannmålsproducenter som tidigare producerade spannmål enligt IP SIGILL och personal på Svenskt Sigill. Studiens slutsats sammanfattas i tre positiva samt tre negativa aspekter som kan ha påverkat spannmålsproducenters inställning till att vara certifierad enligt IP SIGILL: Positiva aspekter: • Genom att certifiera produktionen enligt IP SIGILL kan producenterna visa att de är kvalitetsmedvetna och har krav på produktionen, att de hänger med i utveckling, och att de vill driva utvecklingen av spannmålsproduktion i Sverige framåt. • Certifierade spannmålsproduktioner enligt IP SIGILL blir uppdaterade lagmässigt för spannmålsproduktion i Sverige, vilket kan leda till en mindre risk för lagbrott. • IP SIGILL tycks medföra att spannmålsproducenter får en positiv utveckling av företaget. Negativa aspekter: • Den initiala merbetalningen som spannmålsproducenter erhöll har minskat och i vissa fall även försvunnit vilket minskat lönsamheten för att vara certifierad enligt IP SIGILL. • Det producenterna förväntade sig att ta del av genom att certifiera produktionen uppfylldes inte vilket kan ha medfört att viljan för att certifiera enligt IP SIGILL minskat. • Kommunikationen mellan Svenskt Sigill och certifierade spannmålsproducenter har inte i tillräcklig omfattning förmedlat de fördelar som produktionen kan få vid en certifiering enligt IP SIGILL. Studien avslutas med att utifrån resultaten ge förslag på förändringar som skulle kunna påverka spannmålsproducenter till att certifiera enligt IP SIGILL. 2008-12-09 Other NonPeerReviewed application/pdf sv https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/10931/1/tunemar_a_170920.pdf Tunemar, Arvid, 2008. Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål. UNSPECIFIED, Uppsala. Uppsala: (NL, NJ) > Dept. of Economics <https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-510.html> urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-7024 swe |
| spellingShingle | Handling, transport, storage and protection of agricultural products Tunemar, Arvid Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål |
| title | Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål |
| title_full | Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål |
| title_fullStr | Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål |
| title_full_unstemmed | Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål |
| title_short | Svenskt Sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål |
| title_sort | svenskt sigills kvalitetssäkring av spannmål |
| topic | Handling, transport, storage and protection of agricultural products |
| url | https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/10931/ https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/10931/ |