Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how?
Research organisations experience increasing demands to analyse on the multidimensional societal impacts of their activities. This leads to more reflections about the integration of organisational strategies devoted to research evaluation and impact monitoring, in order to answer societal and fu...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier B.V.
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001896?via%3Dihub http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/41189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105140 |
| _version_ | 1854957023050858496 |
|---|---|
| author | Ferré, Marie Blundo Canto, Genowefa Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti Ramírez Gomez, María Margarita Vedovoto, Graciela Luzia Agudelo Chocontá, Beatriz Elena Marques, Daniela Vieira Valladao Flores, Roberto Manolio Rodríguez Borray, Gonzalo Alfredo de Souza, Mirian Oliveira Goulet, Frédéric Vásquez Urriago, Angela Rocío Sanchez Lozano, Juliana Ivonne Pinto, Daniela Maciel Zambrano Moreno, Gregorio Salomón Londono Arias, María Aidé Zapata Tamayo, Cristóbal Alfonso de Romémont, Aurelle |
| author_browse | Agudelo Chocontá, Beatriz Elena Blundo Canto, Genowefa Ferré, Marie Goulet, Frédéric Londono Arias, María Aidé Marques, Daniela Vieira Pinto, Daniela Maciel Ramírez Gomez, María Margarita Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti Rodríguez Borray, Gonzalo Alfredo Sanchez Lozano, Juliana Ivonne Valladao Flores, Roberto Manolio Vedovoto, Graciela Luzia Vásquez Urriago, Angela Rocío Zambrano Moreno, Gregorio Salomón Zapata Tamayo, Cristóbal Alfonso de Romémont, Aurelle de Souza, Mirian Oliveira |
| author_facet | Ferré, Marie Blundo Canto, Genowefa Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti Ramírez Gomez, María Margarita Vedovoto, Graciela Luzia Agudelo Chocontá, Beatriz Elena Marques, Daniela Vieira Valladao Flores, Roberto Manolio Rodríguez Borray, Gonzalo Alfredo de Souza, Mirian Oliveira Goulet, Frédéric Vásquez Urriago, Angela Rocío Sanchez Lozano, Juliana Ivonne Pinto, Daniela Maciel Zambrano Moreno, Gregorio Salomón Londono Arias, María Aidé Zapata Tamayo, Cristóbal Alfonso de Romémont, Aurelle |
| author_sort | Ferré, Marie |
| collection | Repositorio AGROSAVIA |
| description | Research organisations experience increasing demands to analyse on the multidimensional societal impacts of
their activities. This leads to more reflections about the integration of organisational strategies devoted to
research evaluation and impact monitoring, in order to answer societal and funder’s demands, improve research
practices, and make research and innovations more transformative to society. Establishing a “culture of impact”
within an organisation is driven by multiple factors and translates into a variety of changes at different organisational levels. We aim to understand what motivates agricultural research organisations to develop a culture of
impact, and the consequences of this culture on research, management, and collaboration practices. For this, we
analyse organisational trajectories of three research organisations: the French Agricultural Research Centre for
International Development (Cirad), the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), and the
Colombian Agricultural Research Corporation (AGROSAVIA). Through a cross-analysis of these cases along the
reasons to integrate impact evaluation in strategic agendas, the materialisation of a culture of impact in practice,
and what it entails in terms of cognitive and practical changes within their respective staff and management
structures, we highlight drivers and patterns of development of a culture of impact, and circumstances that seem
to either favour or hinder its emergence. This study is unique for examining various types of changes that a
culture of impact can generate among individuals, in particular. It offers valuable material to enable reinterrogate and orient a research organisation’s culture of impact’s path in accordance with organisational values, priorities, and opportunities. |
| format | article |
| id | RepoAGROSAVIA41189 |
| institution | Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
| publisherStr | Elsevier B.V. |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | RepoAGROSAVIA411892025-09-06T03:00:36Z Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how? Ferré, Marie Blundo Canto, Genowefa Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti Ramírez Gomez, María Margarita Vedovoto, Graciela Luzia Agudelo Chocontá, Beatriz Elena Marques, Daniela Vieira Valladao Flores, Roberto Manolio Rodríguez Borray, Gonzalo Alfredo de Souza, Mirian Oliveira Goulet, Frédéric Vásquez Urriago, Angela Rocío Sanchez Lozano, Juliana Ivonne Pinto, Daniela Maciel Zambrano Moreno, Gregorio Salomón Londono Arias, María Aidé Zapata Tamayo, Cristóbal Alfonso de Romémont, Aurelle Investigación agropecuaria - A50 Investigación Desarrollo rural Agricultura Transversal http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6513 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6701 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_203 Research organisations experience increasing demands to analyse on the multidimensional societal impacts of their activities. This leads to more reflections about the integration of organisational strategies devoted to research evaluation and impact monitoring, in order to answer societal and funder’s demands, improve research practices, and make research and innovations more transformative to society. Establishing a “culture of impact” within an organisation is driven by multiple factors and translates into a variety of changes at different organisational levels. We aim to understand what motivates agricultural research organisations to develop a culture of impact, and the consequences of this culture on research, management, and collaboration practices. For this, we analyse organisational trajectories of three research organisations: the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (Cirad), the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), and the Colombian Agricultural Research Corporation (AGROSAVIA). Through a cross-analysis of these cases along the reasons to integrate impact evaluation in strategic agendas, the materialisation of a culture of impact in practice, and what it entails in terms of cognitive and practical changes within their respective staff and management structures, we highlight drivers and patterns of development of a culture of impact, and circumstances that seem to either favour or hinder its emergence. This study is unique for examining various types of changes that a culture of impact can generate among individuals, in particular. It offers valuable material to enable reinterrogate and orient a research organisation’s culture of impact’s path in accordance with organisational values, priorities, and opportunities. French National Research Agency (ANR) 2025-09-05T14:22:10Z 2025-09-05T14:22:10Z 2025-01 2025 article Artículo científico http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 info:eu-repo/semantics/article https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001896?via%3Dihub 0048-7333 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/41189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105140 reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia instname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA eng Research Policy 54 1 Abdi, Kambiz, Senin, Aslan Amat, 2015. Empirical study on the effect of organizational culture on organization innovation. Asian Soc. Sci. 11, 114–128. AGROSAVIA 2022: file:///C:/Users/mferre/Downloads/Ver_Documento_38187.pdf accessed 24.110.2024. AGROSAVIA, 2023. Tejer impacto. Metodología para la evaluacion ´ ex ante de impacto de proyectos de investigacion ´ y desarrollo del sector agropecuario. Corporacion ´ Colombiana de Investigacion ´ Agropecuaria, Mosquera, Colombia. Akhavan, P., Sanjaghi, M.E., Ojaghi, H., 2014. Examining the relationships between organizational culture, knowledge management and environmental responsiveness capability. Eur. J. Mark. 44 (2). https://doi.org/10.1108/VINE-07-2012-0026. Akhtar, S., Arif, A., Rubi, E., Naveed, S., 2011. Impact of institutional lernaing on institutional performance: study of higher education institutes. Int. J. Acad. Res. 3 (5), 6. Alegre, J., Chiva, R., 2008. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test. Technovation 28 (6), 315–326. Alsabbagh, M., Khalil, A.H.A., 2017. The impact of institutional culture on institutional learning (an empirical study on the education sector in Damascus City). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 7 (4), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2834. Avila, A.F.D., Rodrigues, G.S., Vedovoto, G. 2008. Avaliaçao ˜ dos Impactos de Tecnologias Geradas pela Embrapa: metodologia de referˆencia. 1. ed. Brasília: Embrapa, 2008. v. 1. 189p. https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/ 132174/1/MetodologiaReferenciaAvalImpactoEmbrapa.pdf. Avila, A.F.D., Rodrigues, G.S., Vedovoto, G.L., Pentead, F.R., Fonseca, W.C. 2015. Embrapa’s experience on the impact assessment of agricultural R&D: 15 years using a multidimensional approach. In: IMPAR CONFERENCE, 2015, Paris. Impacts of agricultural research: towards an approach of societal values: [Proceedings...]. Paris: INRA, 2015. 25. Barret, D., Blundo-Canto, G., Dabat, M.H., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., Faure, G., Hainzelin, E., Math´e, S., Temple, L., Toillier, A., Triomphe, B., 2017. Guide m´ethodologique ImpresS: ´evaluation ex post des impacts de la recherche agronomique dans les pays du Sud. CIRAD, Montpellier. https://doi.org/10.19182/ agritrop/00005 (96 pp.). Bayley, J.E., Phipps, D., 2019. Building the concept of research impact literacy. Evidence & Policy 15 (4), 597–606. Retrieved Feb 8, 2024, from. https://doi.org/10.1332 /174426417X15034894876108. Bin, A., Gianonni, C., Mendes, P.J.V., Rio, C., Salles Filho, S.L.M., Bezerra, L.C., 2013. Organisation of research and innovation: a comparative study of public agricultural research institutions. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 8 (95–96), 2013. https://doi.org/ 10.4067/S0718-27242013000300048. Blundo-Canto, G., Triomphe, B., Faure, G., Barret, D., de Rom´emont, A., Hainzelin, E., 2019. Building a culture of impact in an international agricultural research organisation: process and reflective learning. Research Evaluation 28 (2), 136–144. Blundo-Canto, G., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., Math´e, S., Faure, G., Cerdan, C., 2020a. Using a participatory theory driven evaluation approach to identify causal mechanisms in innovation processes. N. Dir. Eval. 167, 59–72. Blundo-Canto, G., de Rom´emont, A., Hainzelin, E., ´ Faure, G., Monier, C., Triomphe, B., Barret, D., Vall, E., ´ 2020b. ImpresS ex ante. An approach for building ex ante impact pathways in development-oriented research. In: ImpresS ex Ante Methodological Guide (Second Version). CIRAD, Montpellier (74 pp.). Bozeman, B., Youtie, J., 2017. Socio-economic impacts and public value of government funded research: lessons from four US National Science Foundation initiatives. Research Policy 46 (8), 1387–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.003. Calvert, J., 2006. What’s special about basic research? Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 31 (2), 199–220. © 2006 Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905283642. Cayla, D., 2007. Organizational Learning: Adaptive Process or Managed Change Process?. Chiva, R., Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., 2007. Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce. Int. J. Manpow. 28 (3/4), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 01437720710755227. Choi, M., Ruona, W.E.A., 2011. Individual readiness for organisational change and its implications for human resource and organisation development. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 10 (1), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310384957. Cirad 2017. Vision strat´egique et ambitions du Cirad 2018–2028: Strategic vision and ambitions Cirad 2018–2028. https://www.cirad.fr/Media/espace-docutheque /docutheque/fichiers/vision-strategique accessed 31.08.2023. Cirad 2018a. Le Cirad se mobilise pour d´eployer la culture de l’impact https://intranet. cirad.fr/les-rubriques-du-portail/les-actualites/2018/actus/impress.-le-cirad-se mobilise-pour-deployer-la-culture-de-l-impact accessed 06.02.2023 Cirad 2018b. Strategical Scientific and Partnership Objectives (OSSP) : Objectifs de strat´egie scientifique et partenariale 2019–2023 [OSSP2] https://www.cirad. fr/view_pdf/4162; https://www.cirad.fr/en/Media/espace-docutheque/docuthe que/fichiers/ossp2 accessed 31.08.2023. Conti, C., Hall, A., Percy, H., Stone-Jovicich, S., Turner, J., McMillan, L., 2024. What does the agri-food systems transformation agenda mean for agricultural research organisations? Exploring organisational prototypes for uncertain futures. Glob. Food Sec. 40, 100733. Cooper, S., 2014. Transformative evaluation: organisational learning through participative practice. The Learning Organisation 21 (2), 146–157. Douthwaite, B., Hoffecker, E., 2017. Towards a complexity-aware theory of change for participatory research programs working within agricultural innovation systems. Agr. Syst. 155, 88–102. Douthwaite, B., Apgar, J.M., Schwarz, A.M., Attwood, S., Senaratna Sellamuttu, S., Clayton, T., 2017. A new professionalism for agricultural research for development. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 15 (3), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14735903.2017.1314754. Duffield, S., Whitty, J., 2016. Application of the systemic lessons learned knowledge model for organisational learning through projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.001. EMBRAPA. 2018a. Workshop internacional promove interaç˜ ao entre especialistas em avaliaçao ˜ de impactos. https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-noticias/-/noticia/79058 949/workshop-internacional-promove-interacao-entre-especialistas-em-avaliacao -de-impactos. EMBRAPA. 2018b. Semin´ ario internacional discute avaliaçao ˜ de impactos. https://www. embrapa.br/busca-de-noticias/-/noticia/79058753/seminario-discute-avaliaca o-de-impactos-e-traz-exemplos-do-cirad-e-da-embrapa?p_auth=ArWo4Uss EMBRAPA, 2020. VII Plano Diretor da Embrapa 2020–2030. Brasília, DF (31 pp. il. color). EMBRAPA, 2023. Balanço social 2022. In: Superintendˆencia de Comunicaç˜ ao, Superintendˆencia de Estrat´egia, 26. ed. Embrapa, Brasília, DF. (67 pp.: il. Color). htt ps://www.embrapa.br/balanco-social-2022. Faure, G., Barret, D., Blundo-Canto, G., Dabat, M.H., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., Le Guerrou´e, J.L., Marqui´e, C., Math´e, S., Temple, L., Toillier, A., Triomphe, B., Hainzelin, E., 2018. How different agricultural re-search models contribute to impacts: evidence from 13 case studies in developing countries. Agr. Syst. 165, 128–136. Faure, G., Blundo-Canto, G., Dabat, M.H., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., Le Guerrou´e, J.L., Math´e, S., Temple, L., Toillier, A., Triomphe, B., Hainzelin, E., 2020. A participatory method to assess the contribution of agricultural research to societal changes in developing countries. Research Evaluation 29 (2), 158–170. Ferr´e, M., Blundo Canto, G., de Rom´emont, A., Maagoum Soh, B.A., Binot, A., 2022. How can the past inform and benefit research-for-development interventions? The value of reflexive and participatory approaches. In Anthropologie & D´eveloppement 53, 155–174. https://doi.org/10.4000/anthropodev.1682. Hainzelin, E., Barret, D., Faure, G., collectif ImpresS., 2016. Agriculture research in developing countries: from a “culture of promise” to a “culture of impact”. Policy Brief. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/583241/1/Impress%20Policy%20Brief.pdf (accessed 02.02.2024). Hainzelin, E., Barret, D., Faure, G., Dabat, M.-H., Triomphe, B., 2017. Agricultural research in the Global South: steering research beyond impact promises. Perspective 42, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00009. Jerez-Gomez, ´ P., C´espedes-Lorente, J., Valle-Cabrera, R., 2005. Institutional learning capability: A proposal of measurement. J. Bus. Res. 58 (6), 715–725. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.002. Joly, P.-B., Matt, M., 2022. Towards a new generation of research impact assessment approaches. J. Technol. Transf. 47, 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017- 9601-0. Joly, P.-B., Colinet, L., Gaunand, A., Lemari´e, S., Matt, M., 2016. Agricultural research impact assessment: issues, methods and challenges. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 98. https://doi.org/10.1787/5339e165-en. Jyothibabu, C., Pradhan, B.B., Farooq, A., 2012. The learning entities in organisational learning – an empirical study. Int. J. Learn. Intellect. Cap. 9 (1/2), 211–225. Klerkx, L., Seuneke, P., de Wolf, P., Rossing, W.A.H., 2017. Replication and translation of co-innovation: the influence of institutional context in large international participatory research projects. Land Use Policy 61, 276–292. Kok, K.P.W., den Boer, A.C.L., Cesuroglu, T., van der Meij, M.G., de Wildt-Liesveld, R., Regeer, B.J., Broerse, J.E.W., 2019. Transforming research and innovation for sustainable food systems—a coupled-systems perspective. Sustainability 11, 7176. Leeuwis, C., Klerkx, L., Schut, M., 2018. Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: integrating science and systemic capacity development. Glob. Food Sec. 16, 17–21. Liao, S.-H., Wu, C., 2010. System perspective of knowledge management, institutional learning, and institutional innovation. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2), 1096–1103. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.109. Maru, Y., Sparrow, A., Stirzaker, R., Davies, J., 2018a. Integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D) from a theory of change perspective. Agr. Syst. 165, 310–320. Maru, Y.T., Sparrow, A., Butler, J.R.A., Banerjee, O., Ison, R., Hall, A., Carberry, P., 2018b. Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: challenges and opportunities. Agr. Syst. 165, 344–353. Matt, M., Gaunand, A., Joly, P.-B., Colinet, L., 2017. Opening the black box of impact – ideal-type impact pathways in a public agricultural research organisation. Res. Policy 46 (1), 207–218. Mayne, J. 2008. Building an evaluative culture for effective evaluation and results management. ILAC Brief No. 20. Rome: Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative. Mayne, J., Johnson, N., 2015. Using theories of change in the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health. Evaluation 21, 407–428. McKay, K., Kuntz, J.R.C., Naswall, ¨ K., 2013. The effect of affective commitment, communication and participation on resistance to change: the role of change readiness. N. Z. J. Psychol. 42 (1). Mintzberg, H., Westley, F., 1992. Cycles of organizational change. Strateg. Manag. J. 13, 39–59. Special Issue: Fundamental Themes in Strategy Process Research. Published by: John Wiley & Sons Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486365. Muscalu, E., 2014. Organizational culture change in the organisation. https://www. armyacademy.ro/reviste/rev4_2014/MUSCALU.pdf. (Accessed 23 October 2024). Omotayo, F.O., 2015. Knowledge Management as an Important Tool in Institutional Management: A Review of Literature. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Preskill, H., Boyle, S., 2008. Insights into evaluation capacity building: motivations, strategies, outcomes, and lessons learned. Can. J. Program Eval. 23 (3), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.0023.008. Pretty, J.N., Chambers, R., 1993. Towards a Learning Paradigm: New Professionalism and Institutions for Agriculture. Discussion paper –. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. Rebelo, T., Gomes, A.D., 2007. Organizational learning and the learning organization: reviewing evolution for prospecting the future. Learn. Organ. 15 (2008), 294–308. Reed, M.S., Ferr´e, M., Martin-Ortega, J., Blanche, R., Dallimer, M., Holden, J., 2021. Evidencing impact from research: a typology of methods. Research Policy 50 (4). Reed, M.S., Gent, S., Seballos, F., Glass, J., Hansda, R., Fischer-Møller, M., 2022. How can impact strategies be developed that better support universities to address twenty first-century challenges? Research for All 6 (1), 24. https://doi.org/10.14324/ RFA.06.1.24. Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., Turner, J.A., 2019. Enacting digitalisation in AKIS: how New Zealand agricultural knowledge providers understand and respond to digital agriculture. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 90-91, 100313. Rodrigues, G.S., Campanhola, C., Kitamura, P.C., 2003. An environmental impact assessment system for agricultural R&D. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 23 (2), 219–244. Rodrigues, G.S., Buschinelli, C.C. de A, Avila, A.F.D. 2010. An environmental impact assessment system for agricultural research and development II: institutional learning experience at Embrapa. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 5 (4): 38–56, 2010. Saari, E., Kallio, K., 2010. Developmental impact evaluation for facilitating learning in innovation networks. Am. J. Eval. v. 32, n. 2. Schein, E.H., 1990. Organizational culture: what it is and how to change it. In: Evans, P., Doz, Y., Laurent, A. (Eds.), Human Resource Management in International Firms. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11255-5_4. Schmid, O., Qui´edeville, S., Sterly, S., Barjolle, D., Midmore, P., 2016. Research Brief: Analysis of Impact Pathways of Research on Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.13140/ RG.2.2.21000.52484. Schot, J., Steinmueller, W.E., 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47, 1554–1567. Seyedyousefi, N., Hosseini Fard, S.M., Tohidi, F., 2016. The role of institutional culture in knowledge management. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016. v7n5p412. Spaapen, J.B., 2015. A new evaluation culture is inevitable. Organic Farming 1 (1), 36–37. https://doi.org/10.12924/of2015.01010036. Stone-Jovicich, S., Percy, H., McMillan, L., Turner, J.A., Chen, L., White, T., 2019. Evaluating monitoring, evaluation and learning initiatives in the New Zealand and Australian agricultural research and innovation systems: the MEL2 framework. Evaluation Journal of Australasia 19 (1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1035719X18823567. Temple, L., Barret, D., Blundo Canto, G., Dabat, M.-H., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., Faure, G., Hainzelin, E., Math´e, S., Toillier, A., Triomphe, B., 2018. Assessing impacts of agricultural research for development: A systemic model focusing on outcomes. Research Evaluation 27 (2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy005. Templeton, G., Bruce, L., Charles., S., 2002. Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19, 175–218. Turner, J.A., Guesmi, B., Gil, J.M., Heanue, K., Sierra, M., Percy, H., Bortagaray, I., Chams, N., Milne, C., 2022. Evaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda: emerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay. Eval. Program Plann. 94 (102127), 1–14. htt ps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149718922000817. Turner, J.A., Percy, H., Hall, A., Klerkx, L., 2023. Re-orientating agricultural research to address complex challenges: legitimacy dynamics of a hybrid research organisation. J. Rural. Stud. 103, 103137. Vedovoto, G.L., Marques, D.V., Valente, L.C.M., Rodrigues, G.S. 2022. Avaliaç˜ ao de impactos de tecnologias agropecu´ arias na Embrapa: dimensao ˜ Desenvolvimento Institucional. Jaguariúna, SP: Embrapa Meio Ambiente, 2022. 22p. (Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Documentos, 1516–4691, 136). https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/ bitstream/doc/1147435/1/Rodrigues-Avaliacao-impactos-2022.pdf. Watts, J., Mackay, R., Horton, D., Hall, A., Douthwaite, B., Chambers, R., Acosta, A. 2007. Institutional Learning and Change: An Introduction. 19. Watts, J., Horton, D., Douthwaite, B., La Rovere, R., Thiele, G., Prasad, S., Staver, C., 2008. Transforming impact assessment: beginning the quiet revolution of institutional learning and change. Exp. Agric. 44 (1), 21–35. Weber, K.M., Rohracher, H., 2012. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Res. Policy 41 (6), 1037–1047. Weißhuhn, P., Helming, K., Ferretti, J., 2018. Research impact assessment in agriculture - A review of approaches and impact areas. Research Evaluation 27, 36–42. White, T., Percy, H., Small, B., 2018. Creating an evaluation culture through capacity building: a new frontier in a science organisation. In: Evaluation Matters—He Take To ¯ Te Aromatawai, 4. 2018 © New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.18296/em.0031, 2018. http://www.nzcer.org. nz/nzcerpress/evaluation-matters. Wolf, B.M., Haring, ¨ A.-M., Hess, J., 2015. Strategies towards evaluation beyond scientific impact. Pathways not only for agricultural research. Organic Farming 1, 3–18. Zhou, W., Hu, H., Shi, X., 2015. Does organizational learning lead to higher firm performance? An investigation of Chinese listing companies. Learn. Organ. Download 157 DOWNLOADS Since December 18, 2020 PlumX Metrics Included in Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons Share Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Partager. Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf application/pdf C.I Tibaitatá Elsevier B.V. Virginia (Estados Unidos) Research Policy; Vol. 54, Núm. 1 (2025): Research Policy (enero). |
| spellingShingle | Investigación agropecuaria - A50 Investigación Desarrollo rural Agricultura Transversal http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6513 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6701 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_203 Ferré, Marie Blundo Canto, Genowefa Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti Ramírez Gomez, María Margarita Vedovoto, Graciela Luzia Agudelo Chocontá, Beatriz Elena Marques, Daniela Vieira Valladao Flores, Roberto Manolio Rodríguez Borray, Gonzalo Alfredo de Souza, Mirian Oliveira Goulet, Frédéric Vásquez Urriago, Angela Rocío Sanchez Lozano, Juliana Ivonne Pinto, Daniela Maciel Zambrano Moreno, Gregorio Salomón Londono Arias, María Aidé Zapata Tamayo, Cristóbal Alfonso de Romémont, Aurelle Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how? |
| title | Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how? |
| title_full | Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how? |
| title_fullStr | Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how? |
| title_short | Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how? |
| title_sort | culture of impact in agricultural research organisations what for and how |
| topic | Investigación agropecuaria - A50 Investigación Desarrollo rural Agricultura Transversal http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6513 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6701 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_203 |
| url | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001896?via%3Dihub http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/41189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105140 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ferremarie cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT blundocantogenowefa cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT rodriguesgeraldostachetti cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT ramirezgomezmariamargarita cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT vedovotogracielaluzia cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT agudelochocontabeatrizelena cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT marquesdanielavieira cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT valladaofloresrobertomanolio cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT rodriguezborraygonzaloalfredo cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT desouzamirianoliveira cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT gouletfrederic cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT vasquezurriagoangelarocio cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT sanchezlozanojulianaivonne cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT pintodanielamaciel cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT zambranomorenogregoriosalomon cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT londonoariasmariaaide cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT zapatatamayocristobalalfonso cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow AT deromemontaurelle cultureofimpactinagriculturalresearchorganisationswhatforandhow |