Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System
In order to evaluate the environmental effect on plant development and mini-tuber production of a diverse group of potato genotypes grown under an aeroponic system, a G × E interaction experiment was carried out in greenhouses located at CIP’s experimental stations in La Molina (Lima) and Huancayo (...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
MDPI journals
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/4/4/514 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/40742 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy4040514 |
| id |
RepoAGROSAVIA40742 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| institution |
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria |
| collection |
Repositorio AGROSAVIA |
| language |
Inglés |
| topic |
Producción y tratamiento de semillas - F03 Solanum tuberosum Genotipo Producción Raíces y tubérculos http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7221 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3225 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6200 |
| spellingShingle |
Producción y tratamiento de semillas - F03 Solanum tuberosum Genotipo Producción Raíces y tubérculos http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7221 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3225 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6200 Mateus Rodriguez, Julián F. De Haan, Stef Rodríguez Delfín, Alfredo Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System |
| description |
In order to evaluate the environmental effect on plant development and mini-tuber production of a diverse group of potato genotypes grown under an aeroponic system, a G × E interaction experiment was carried out in greenhouses located at CIP’s experimental stations in La Molina (Lima) and Huancayo (Junín). Five contrasting environments were set-up and evaluated. A combined Analysis of Variance was performed for the variables “days to tuber set”, “days to senescence” and “plant height”. An Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) Analysis was performed for yield variables: mini-tuber “weight” and “number of mini-tubers” per plant. There was a high variation in all the responses to the treatments. “Days to tuber set” was influenced by genetic responses, temperature and greenhouse Photosynthetically Active Radiation intensity. Considerable increases in the length of the vegetative cycle and plant height were recorded for all genotypes, and these were particularly notable in the warmer coastal environments. AMMI analysis showed that yield variables were primarily influenced by the genotypic effect followed by the genotype by environment interaction effect. The Venturana variety (T2) was the best performing genotype with a total average mini-tuber “weight” of 644 g per plant while the Chucmarina variety (T1) performed best for the variable “number of mini-tubers” with an overall average of 60.2 mini-tubers per plant. Both showed stability across different environments for these variables. The advanced clones T3 (395434.1), T5 (397077.16) and T6 (397073.16) showed stability for yield variables, but their performance was below the overall average of the trial. It is recommended that the environment and management should ideally be tailored to the genotype as this will result in significant yield gains. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Mateus Rodriguez, Julián F. De Haan, Stef Rodríguez Delfín, Alfredo |
| author_facet |
Mateus Rodriguez, Julián F. De Haan, Stef Rodríguez Delfín, Alfredo |
| author_sort |
Mateus Rodriguez, Julián F. |
| title |
Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System |
| title_short |
Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System |
| title_full |
Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System |
| title_fullStr |
Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System |
| title_sort |
genotype by environment effects on potato mini-tuber seed production in an aeroponics system |
| publisher |
MDPI journals |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/4/4/514 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/40742 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy4040514 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT mateusrodriguezjulianf genotypebyenvironmenteffectsonpotatominituberseedproductioninanaeroponicssystem AT dehaanstef genotypebyenvironmenteffectsonpotatominituberseedproductioninanaeroponicssystem AT rodriguezdelfinalfredo genotypebyenvironmenteffectsonpotatominituberseedproductioninanaeroponicssystem |
| _version_ |
1842255694468743168 |
| spelling |
RepoAGROSAVIA407422025-03-04T03:00:41Z Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System Genotype by Environment Effects on Potato Mini-Tuber Seed Production in an Aeroponics System Mateus Rodriguez, Julián F. De Haan, Stef Rodríguez Delfín, Alfredo Producción y tratamiento de semillas - F03 Solanum tuberosum Genotipo Producción Raíces y tubérculos http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7221 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3225 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6200 In order to evaluate the environmental effect on plant development and mini-tuber production of a diverse group of potato genotypes grown under an aeroponic system, a G × E interaction experiment was carried out in greenhouses located at CIP’s experimental stations in La Molina (Lima) and Huancayo (Junín). Five contrasting environments were set-up and evaluated. A combined Analysis of Variance was performed for the variables “days to tuber set”, “days to senescence” and “plant height”. An Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) Analysis was performed for yield variables: mini-tuber “weight” and “number of mini-tubers” per plant. There was a high variation in all the responses to the treatments. “Days to tuber set” was influenced by genetic responses, temperature and greenhouse Photosynthetically Active Radiation intensity. Considerable increases in the length of the vegetative cycle and plant height were recorded for all genotypes, and these were particularly notable in the warmer coastal environments. AMMI analysis showed that yield variables were primarily influenced by the genotypic effect followed by the genotype by environment interaction effect. The Venturana variety (T2) was the best performing genotype with a total average mini-tuber “weight” of 644 g per plant while the Chucmarina variety (T1) performed best for the variable “number of mini-tubers” with an overall average of 60.2 mini-tubers per plant. Both showed stability across different environments for these variables. The advanced clones T3 (395434.1), T5 (397077.16) and T6 (397073.16) showed stability for yield variables, but their performance was below the overall average of the trial. It is recommended that the environment and management should ideally be tailored to the genotype as this will result in significant yield gains. Regional Fund for Agricultural Development - FONTAGRO Papa-Solanum tuberosum 2025-03-03T16:12:38Z 2025-03-03T16:12:38Z 2014-11 2014 article Artículo científico http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 info:eu-repo/semantics/article https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/4/4/514 2073-4395 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/40742 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy4040514 reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia instname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA eng Agronomy 4 1 514 528 Simmonds, N.W. A review of potato propagation by means of seed, as distinct from clonal propagation by tubers. Potato Res. 1997, 40, 191–214. Chuquillanqui, C.; Tenorio, J.; Salazar, L.F. Producción de semilla de papa por hidroponía. In Alternativas al Uso del Bromuro de Metilo para la Producción de Semilla de Papa de Calidad; CIP, Ed.; International Potato Center (CIP): Lima, Perú, 2007; pp. 26–34. Daniels, J.; Pereira, A.; Fortes, G.R.L. Verticalização da Produção de Batata-Semente por Produtores de Agricultura Familiar no Rio Grande do Sul; Embrapa Clima Temperado: Pelotas, Brasil, 2000; p. 4. Muro, J.; Díaz, V.; Goni, J.L.; Lamsfus, C. Comparasion of hydroponic culture and culture in a peat/sand mixture and the influence of nutrient solution and plant density on seed potato yields. Potato Res. 1997, 40, 431–438. Ranalli, P. Innovative propagation methods in seed tuber multiplication programmes. Potato Res. 1997, 40, 439–453. Ritter, E.; Angulo, B.; Riga, P.; Herrán, J.; Relloso, J.; San José, M. Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponic cultivation systems for the production of potato minitubers. Potato Res. 2001, 44, 127–135. Loomen, W.J.M. Basic Studies on the Production and Performance of Potato Minitubers. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1995. Rodríguez-Delfín, A.; Chang, M.; Hoyos, M.; Falcón, F. Manual Práctico de Hidroponía, 2nd ed.; Centro de Investigación de Hidroponía y Nutrición Mineral-Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina: Lima, Perú, 2004; p. 100. Christie, C.B.; Nichols, M.A. Aeroponics: A Production system and research tool. Acta Hortic. 2004, 648, 289–291. Mateus-Rodriguez, J.; de Haan, S.; Andrade-Piedra, J.; Maldonado, L.; Hareau, G.; Barker, I.; Chuquillanqui, C.; Otazú, V.; Frisancho, R.; Bastos, C.; et al. Technical and economic analysis of aeroponics and other system for potato mini-tuber production in latin America. Am. J. Potato Res. 2013, 90, 357–368. Farran, I.; Mingo-Castel, A.M. Potato minituber production using aeroponics: Effects of Plant density and harvesting intervals. Am. J. Potato Res. 2006, 83, 47–53. Otazú, V.; Chuquillanqui, C. Producción de Papa de Calidad por Aeroponia. In Alternativas al Uso del Bromuro de Metilo para la Producción de Semilla de Papa de Calidad; Centro Internacional de la Papa: Lima, Perú, 2007; pp. 35–45. Ewing, E.E. Potato. The Physiology of Vegetable Crops; Wien, H.C., Ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1997; pp. 295–344. Haverkort, A.J. Ecology of potato cropping systems in relation to latitude and altitude. Agric. Syst. 1990, 32, 251–272. Menzel, C.M. Tuberization in potato at high temperatures: Interaction between temperature and irradiance. Ann. Bot. 1985, 55, 35–39. Midmore, D.J. Potato production in the tropics. In The Potato Crop: The Scientific Basis for Improvement, 2nd ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 728–793. Yan, W.; Hunt, L.A.; Sheng, Q.; Szlavnics, Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 2000, 40, 597–605. Yan, W.; Hunt, L.A. Interpretation of Genotype×Environment Interaction for Winter Wheat Yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 19–25. Ewing, E.E. Heat stress and the tuberization stimulus. Am. Potato J. 1981, 58, 31–49. Menzel, C.M. The potato as a potential crop for the lowlands tropics. Trop. Agric. 1984, 61, 162–166. Kang, J.G.; Yang, S.Y.; Kim, S.Y. Effects of nitrogen levels on the plant growth, tuberization and quality of potatoes grown in aeroponics. J. Korean Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1996, 37, 761–766. Khedher, M.B.; Ewing, E.E. Growth analysis of eleven potato cultivars grown in the greenhouse under long photoperiods with and without heat stress. Am. Potato J. 1985, 62, 537–554. Wolf, S.; Marani, A.; Rudich, J. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on assimilate partitioning in potato plants. Ann. Bot. 1990, 66, 513–520. Steward, F.C.; Moreno, U.; Roca, W.M. Growth, form, and composition of potato plants as affected by environment. Ann. Bot. 1981, 48, 1–45. Cooper, A.J. Root Temperature and Plant Growth, a Review; Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: Slough, UK, 1973; p. 73. Crossa, J.; Gauch, H.G.; Zobel, R.W. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 1990, 30, 493–500. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf application/pdf Colombia MDPI journals Agronomy; Vol. 4, (2014): Agronomy (Nov.);p. 514-528. |