Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others?
Cryopreserved sperm plays a pivotal role in dairy goats breeding programs. The processes of cooling to 4 °C (C) and freezing (F) in liquid nitrogen (LN) vapor may be achieved by using different methods some of them more economic and simpler (beaker (B) in a cooling chamber at 4 °C and polystyrene...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | poster |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/8902 |
| _version_ | 1855032875357831168 |
|---|---|
| author | Sagbay, Cristhian Esteve, Inés Carolina Despons, Kevin Durá, Anabel Martínez-Talaván, Amparo Gómez, Ernesto A. Mocé, Maria Lorena Mocé, Eva |
| author_browse | Despons, Kevin Durá, Anabel Esteve, Inés Carolina Gómez, Ernesto A. Martínez-Talaván, Amparo Mocé, Eva Mocé, Maria Lorena Sagbay, Cristhian |
| author_facet | Sagbay, Cristhian Esteve, Inés Carolina Despons, Kevin Durá, Anabel Martínez-Talaván, Amparo Gómez, Ernesto A. Mocé, Maria Lorena Mocé, Eva |
| author_sort | Sagbay, Cristhian |
| collection | ReDivia |
| description | Cryopreserved sperm plays a pivotal role in dairy goats breeding programs. The
processes of cooling to 4 °C (C) and freezing (F) in liquid nitrogen (LN) vapor may be
achieved by using different methods some of them more economic and simpler (beaker
(B) in a cooling chamber at 4 °C and polystyrene (P) box with LN) and some others more
expensive and sophisticated (programmable refrigerated water bath (WB) and freezer
(PF)). In this study, we compared the quality of goat sperm cryopreserved with a
skimmed milk-glucose-glycerol extender and four cryopreservation protocols: B-P, BPF,
WB-P, WB-PF. Five goat males from Murciano-Granadina breed were used,
processing two ejaculates per male. Total (TM, %) and progressively motile sperm (PM;
%) as well as the average path velocity (VAP; m/s) were determined with a CASA
system and acrosome reacted sperm (AR; %) was determined with the fluorescent stain
FITC-PNA and flow cytometry [1]. Data were analyzed using ANOVA with C (2 levels)
and F methods (2 levels) and their interaction, session (5 levels) and male (5 levels) as
fixed effects. Interaction effect was not significant. Similar values for the two C (B and
WB) and the two F methods (P and PF) were observed for TM (61 to 62% ± 1.9), PM (44
to 46% ± 2.2) and VAP (68 to 71 m/s ± 3.2). The two C methods gave similar AR sperm
(7.6 for B and 7.3 for WB) but more AR sperm were observed (p < 0.05) when freezing
in P box (7.8% ± 0.27) than in PF (7.1 ± 0.27). In conclusion, any of the protocols tested
is equally effective for cryopreserving goat buck sperm. Acknowledgements: AMURVAL,
GVA-IVIA (52201K) co-funded by the EU through OP ERDF of the CV 2021-2027 and
CEU Universities (INDI2140). |
| format | poster |
| id | ReDivia8902 |
| institution | Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ReDivia89022025-04-25T14:54:24Z Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others? Sagbay, Cristhian Esteve, Inés Carolina Despons, Kevin Durá, Anabel Martínez-Talaván, Amparo Gómez, Ernesto A. Mocé, Maria Lorena Mocé, Eva L53 Animal physiology - Reproduction Spermatozoa Freezing Cooling systems Cryopreserved sperm plays a pivotal role in dairy goats breeding programs. The processes of cooling to 4 °C (C) and freezing (F) in liquid nitrogen (LN) vapor may be achieved by using different methods some of them more economic and simpler (beaker (B) in a cooling chamber at 4 °C and polystyrene (P) box with LN) and some others more expensive and sophisticated (programmable refrigerated water bath (WB) and freezer (PF)). In this study, we compared the quality of goat sperm cryopreserved with a skimmed milk-glucose-glycerol extender and four cryopreservation protocols: B-P, BPF, WB-P, WB-PF. Five goat males from Murciano-Granadina breed were used, processing two ejaculates per male. Total (TM, %) and progressively motile sperm (PM; %) as well as the average path velocity (VAP; m/s) were determined with a CASA system and acrosome reacted sperm (AR; %) was determined with the fluorescent stain FITC-PNA and flow cytometry [1]. Data were analyzed using ANOVA with C (2 levels) and F methods (2 levels) and their interaction, session (5 levels) and male (5 levels) as fixed effects. Interaction effect was not significant. Similar values for the two C (B and WB) and the two F methods (P and PF) were observed for TM (61 to 62% ± 1.9), PM (44 to 46% ± 2.2) and VAP (68 to 71 m/s ± 3.2). The two C methods gave similar AR sperm (7.6 for B and 7.3 for WB) but more AR sperm were observed (p < 0.05) when freezing in P box (7.8% ± 0.27) than in PF (7.1 ± 0.27). In conclusion, any of the protocols tested is equally effective for cryopreserving goat buck sperm. Acknowledgements: AMURVAL, GVA-IVIA (52201K) co-funded by the EU through OP ERDF of the CV 2021-2027 and CEU Universities (INDI2140). 2024-05-17T11:49:28Z 2024-05-17T11:49:28Z 2023 poster Sagbay, C., Esteve, I.C., Despons, K., Durá, A., Martínez-Talaván, A., Gómez, E. A., Mocé, M. L., Mocé, E. (2023). Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others? 59th Meeting of Society for Low Temperature Biology (SLTB). [Poster presentation] https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/8902 en 2023-09-20 59th Meeting Society for Low Temperature Biology Vigo Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ openAccess electronico |
| spellingShingle | L53 Animal physiology - Reproduction Spermatozoa Freezing Cooling systems Sagbay, Cristhian Esteve, Inés Carolina Despons, Kevin Durá, Anabel Martínez-Talaván, Amparo Gómez, Ernesto A. Mocé, Maria Lorena Mocé, Eva Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others? |
| title | Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others? |
| title_full | Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others? |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others? |
| title_short | Comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm: is there any combination superior to the others? |
| title_sort | comparison of cooling and freezing protocols for cryopreserving goat buck sperm is there any combination superior to the others |
| topic | L53 Animal physiology - Reproduction Spermatozoa Freezing Cooling systems |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/8902 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sagbaycristhian comparisonofcoolingandfreezingprotocolsforcryopreservinggoatbuckspermisthereanycombinationsuperiortotheothers AT esteveinescarolina comparisonofcoolingandfreezingprotocolsforcryopreservinggoatbuckspermisthereanycombinationsuperiortotheothers AT desponskevin comparisonofcoolingandfreezingprotocolsforcryopreservinggoatbuckspermisthereanycombinationsuperiortotheothers AT duraanabel comparisonofcoolingandfreezingprotocolsforcryopreservinggoatbuckspermisthereanycombinationsuperiortotheothers AT martineztalavanamparo comparisonofcoolingandfreezingprotocolsforcryopreservinggoatbuckspermisthereanycombinationsuperiortotheothers AT gomezernestoa comparisonofcoolingandfreezingprotocolsforcryopreservinggoatbuckspermisthereanycombinationsuperiortotheothers AT mocemarialorena comparisonofcoolingandfreezingprotocolsforcryopreservinggoatbuckspermisthereanycombinationsuperiortotheothers AT moceeva comparisonofcoolingandfreezingprotocolsforcryopreservinggoatbuckspermisthereanycombinationsuperiortotheothers |