Are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro-duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles?
Air injection nozzles are often recommended to reduce drift, which is one of the major pollu-tion sources caused by the application of plant protection products on fruit trees. However, it is important to know if the use of low-drift nozzles may affect the efficacy of treatments. This work is aimed...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | conferenceObject |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
EurAgEng
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/8440 |
| _version_ | 1855032790420029440 |
|---|---|
| author | Garcerá, Cruz Salcedo, Ramón Moltó, Enrique Chueca, Patricia |
| author_browse | Chueca, Patricia Garcerá, Cruz Moltó, Enrique Salcedo, Ramón |
| author_facet | Garcerá, Cruz Salcedo, Ramón Moltó, Enrique Chueca, Patricia |
| author_sort | Garcerá, Cruz |
| collection | ReDivia |
| description | Air injection nozzles are often recommended to reduce drift, which is one of the major pollu-tion sources caused by the application of plant protection products on fruit trees. However, it is important to know if the use of low-drift nozzles may affect the efficacy of treatments. This work is aimed at providing scientific evidence to asses if there are changes in the deposition pattern on citrus canopies when using conventional (cone) and low-drift (air injection) nozzles and discuss the consequences on efficacy of pesticides. Results showed that the air injection nozzles did not affect deposition in the conditions of the experiments, so they suggest that these nozzles can be regarded as a good alternative to the conventional ones. |
| format | conferenceObject |
| id | ReDivia8440 |
| institution | Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateRange | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | EurAgEng |
| publisherStr | EurAgEng |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ReDivia84402025-04-25T14:54:18Z Are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro-duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles? Garcerá, Cruz Salcedo, Ramón Moltó, Enrique Chueca, Patricia Deposition Airblast sprayer Phytosanitary application efficiency N20 Agricultural machinery and equipment T01 Pollution T10 Occupational diseases and hazards U40 Surveying methods Pesticides Citrus Tree canopy Pollution Plant protection equipment Air injection nozzles are often recommended to reduce drift, which is one of the major pollu-tion sources caused by the application of plant protection products on fruit trees. However, it is important to know if the use of low-drift nozzles may affect the efficacy of treatments. This work is aimed at providing scientific evidence to asses if there are changes in the deposition pattern on citrus canopies when using conventional (cone) and low-drift (air injection) nozzles and discuss the consequences on efficacy of pesticides. Results showed that the air injection nozzles did not affect deposition in the conditions of the experiments, so they suggest that these nozzles can be regarded as a good alternative to the conventional ones. 2022-11-24T09:25:28Z 2022-11-24T09:25:28Z 2014 conferenceObject Garcerá, C., Salcedo, R., Moltó, E. & Chueca, P. (2014). Are there differences on spray deposit distribution produced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles?. Proceedings International of the Conference of Agricultural Engineering, 1-5. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/8440 en 2014-07 European Conference on Agricultural Engineering (AgEng2014) Zurich, Suiza This research was partially funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España (project AGL2010-22304-C04-01) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER). Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ openAccess EurAgEng electronico |
| spellingShingle | Deposition Airblast sprayer Phytosanitary application efficiency N20 Agricultural machinery and equipment T01 Pollution T10 Occupational diseases and hazards U40 Surveying methods Pesticides Citrus Tree canopy Pollution Plant protection equipment Garcerá, Cruz Salcedo, Ramón Moltó, Enrique Chueca, Patricia Are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro-duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles? |
| title | Are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro-duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles? |
| title_full | Are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro-duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles? |
| title_fullStr | Are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro-duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro-duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles? |
| title_short | Are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro-duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low-drift nozzles? |
| title_sort | are there differences on spray deposit distribution pro duced on citrus canopies by conventional and low drift nozzles |
| topic | Deposition Airblast sprayer Phytosanitary application efficiency N20 Agricultural machinery and equipment T01 Pollution T10 Occupational diseases and hazards U40 Surveying methods Pesticides Citrus Tree canopy Pollution Plant protection equipment |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/8440 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT garceracruz aretheredifferencesonspraydepositdistributionproducedoncitruscanopiesbyconventionalandlowdriftnozzles AT salcedoramon aretheredifferencesonspraydepositdistributionproducedoncitruscanopiesbyconventionalandlowdriftnozzles AT moltoenrique aretheredifferencesonspraydepositdistributionproducedoncitruscanopiesbyconventionalandlowdriftnozzles AT chuecapatricia aretheredifferencesonspraydepositdistributionproducedoncitruscanopiesbyconventionalandlowdriftnozzles |