A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground

Electromagnetic induction (EMI) measurements (σb*) are widely used for the survey of several soil attributes, among which basic properties such as salinity (σe),water content (θw), clay (wc), organic matter (wom) and bulk density (ρb) standout. In usual practice, purely empirical models relating one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visconti, Fernando, De-Paz, José M.
Formato: article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley Online Library 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/7067
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13044
_version_ 1855032539696070656
author Visconti, Fernando
De-Paz, José M.
author_browse De-Paz, José M.
Visconti, Fernando
author_facet Visconti, Fernando
De-Paz, José M.
author_sort Visconti, Fernando
collection ReDivia
description Electromagnetic induction (EMI) measurements (σb*) are widely used for the survey of several soil attributes, among which basic properties such as salinity (σe),water content (θw), clay (wc), organic matter (wom) and bulk density (ρb) standout. In usual practice, purely empirical models relating one of these properties to σb* are calibrated at selected sites. However, this calibration is site and time specific and has to be repeated time and again. In order to understand where the variability of the EMI empirical models comes from, it is necessary to know how the different soil properties contribute to them and, with this aim, a more physically based relationship between σb* and, at least, σe, θw, wc, wom and ρb was developed in this work, additionally including soil temperature (t). It was calibrated and cross-validated with the data from one survey carried out in a wide agricultural irrigation area in SE Spain, taking σb* measurements with the Geonics EM38 in the horizontal and vertical dipole modes and at various heights over the ground. Then, it was externally validated with the data from a second survey carried out 4 years later in the same area but in a different season. In the calibration, R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) were 0.84 and 0.18 dS m−1(41%), respectively, forthe vertical dipole orientation and 0.90 and 0.11 dS m−1(39%) for the horizontalone. In the external validation, R2 and RMSE were 0.80 and 0.24 dS m−1(44%),respectively, for the vertical dipole orientation and 0.90 and 0.13 dS m−1(38%) for the horizontal one. Therefore, because the performance of the model barely worsened as time passed by, it can be considered to represent the underlying physicalprocess and, therefore, to increase our understanding of how the soil EMI signalsare generated, with potential benefits for the planning and comparability of EMI soil measurements, specifically with the EM38, among different areas.
format article
id ReDivia7067
institution Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA)
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Wiley Online Library
publisherStr Wiley Online Library
record_format dspace
spelling ReDivia70672025-04-25T14:48:07Z A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground Visconti, Fernando De-Paz, José M. Electromagnetic induction N01 Agricultural engineering P33 Soil chemistry and physics P32 Soil classification and genesis Organic matter Salinity Texture Water content Electromagnetic induction (EMI) measurements (σb*) are widely used for the survey of several soil attributes, among which basic properties such as salinity (σe),water content (θw), clay (wc), organic matter (wom) and bulk density (ρb) standout. In usual practice, purely empirical models relating one of these properties to σb* are calibrated at selected sites. However, this calibration is site and time specific and has to be repeated time and again. In order to understand where the variability of the EMI empirical models comes from, it is necessary to know how the different soil properties contribute to them and, with this aim, a more physically based relationship between σb* and, at least, σe, θw, wc, wom and ρb was developed in this work, additionally including soil temperature (t). It was calibrated and cross-validated with the data from one survey carried out in a wide agricultural irrigation area in SE Spain, taking σb* measurements with the Geonics EM38 in the horizontal and vertical dipole modes and at various heights over the ground. Then, it was externally validated with the data from a second survey carried out 4 years later in the same area but in a different season. In the calibration, R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) were 0.84 and 0.18 dS m−1(41%), respectively, forthe vertical dipole orientation and 0.90 and 0.11 dS m−1(39%) for the horizontalone. In the external validation, R2 and RMSE were 0.80 and 0.24 dS m−1(44%),respectively, for the vertical dipole orientation and 0.90 and 0.13 dS m−1(38%) for the horizontal one. Therefore, because the performance of the model barely worsened as time passed by, it can be considered to represent the underlying physicalprocess and, therefore, to increase our understanding of how the soil EMI signalsare generated, with potential benefits for the planning and comparability of EMI soil measurements, specifically with the EM38, among different areas. 2021-02-08T08:36:40Z 2021-02-08T08:36:40Z 2020 article acceptedVersion Visconti F, & De-Paz, J. M. (2020). A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground properties. Eur J Soil Sci. 2020;1–19. 1365-2389 (on-line) http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/7067 10.1111/ejss.13044 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13044 en Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ openAccess Wiley Online Library electronico
spellingShingle Electromagnetic induction
N01 Agricultural engineering
P33 Soil chemistry and physics
P32 Soil classification and genesis
Organic matter
Salinity
Texture
Water content
Visconti, Fernando
De-Paz, José M.
A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground
title A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground
title_full A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground
title_fullStr A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground
title_full_unstemmed A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground
title_short A semi-empirical model to predict the EM38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground
title_sort semi empirical model to predict the em38 electromagnetic induction measurements of soils from basic ground
topic Electromagnetic induction
N01 Agricultural engineering
P33 Soil chemistry and physics
P32 Soil classification and genesis
Organic matter
Salinity
Texture
Water content
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/7067
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13044
work_keys_str_mv AT viscontifernando asemiempiricalmodeltopredicttheem38electromagneticinductionmeasurementsofsoilsfrombasicground
AT depazjosem asemiempiricalmodeltopredicttheem38electromagneticinductionmeasurementsofsoilsfrombasicground
AT viscontifernando semiempiricalmodeltopredicttheem38electromagneticinductionmeasurementsofsoilsfrombasicground
AT depazjosem semiempiricalmodeltopredicttheem38electromagneticinductionmeasurementsofsoilsfrombasicground