Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift

The objective of this study was to evaluate and to compare spray drift potential and field spray drift from pesticide application in citrus orchards carried out mainly comparing standard nozzles with drift reducing nozzles. Two different standard nozzles (hollow cone and full cone) and one Venturi d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torrent, Xavier, Garcerá, Cruz, Moltó, Enrique, Chueca, Patricia, Abad-Moyano, Raquel, Grafulla, Carmen, Román, Carla, Planas, Santiago
Formato: article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2018
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/6107
_version_ 1855032367879553024
author Torrent, Xavier
Garcerá, Cruz
Moltó, Enrique
Chueca, Patricia
Abad-Moyano, Raquel
Grafulla, Carmen
Román, Carla
Planas, Santiago
author_browse Abad-Moyano, Raquel
Chueca, Patricia
Garcerá, Cruz
Grafulla, Carmen
Moltó, Enrique
Planas, Santiago
Román, Carla
Torrent, Xavier
author_facet Torrent, Xavier
Garcerá, Cruz
Moltó, Enrique
Chueca, Patricia
Abad-Moyano, Raquel
Grafulla, Carmen
Román, Carla
Planas, Santiago
author_sort Torrent, Xavier
collection ReDivia
description The objective of this study was to evaluate and to compare spray drift potential and field spray drift from pesticide application in citrus orchards carried out mainly comparing standard nozzles with drift reducing nozzles. Two different standard nozzles (hollow cone and full cone) and one Venturi drift reducing nozzle (hollow cone) were tested. Spray drift potential was measured by means of wind tunnel experiments (ISO 22856:2008 method). To estimate field airborne and sedimenting spray drift, two trials with 5 replicates each were carried out (ISO 22866:2005 method) in two different commercial orchards of Clementine mandarins. Results showed that Venturi nozzles significantly reduced drift with the two methodologies. Moreover, the wind tunnel method showed the same trend as the field results. Additionally, spray drift deposition variability was lower for the Venturi nozzles. Therefore, it could be concluded that Venturi nozzles can be recommended to be used in citrus orchards to prevent human and environmental risks and their use could be appropriate for different scenarios where spray drift risk must be mitigated. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
format article
id ReDivia6107
institution Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA)
language Inglés
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
record_format dspace
spelling ReDivia61072025-04-25T14:46:14Z Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift Torrent, Xavier Garcerá, Cruz Moltó, Enrique Chueca, Patricia Abad-Moyano, Raquel Grafulla, Carmen Román, Carla Planas, Santiago The objective of this study was to evaluate and to compare spray drift potential and field spray drift from pesticide application in citrus orchards carried out mainly comparing standard nozzles with drift reducing nozzles. Two different standard nozzles (hollow cone and full cone) and one Venturi drift reducing nozzle (hollow cone) were tested. Spray drift potential was measured by means of wind tunnel experiments (ISO 22856:2008 method). To estimate field airborne and sedimenting spray drift, two trials with 5 replicates each were carried out (ISO 22866:2005 method) in two different commercial orchards of Clementine mandarins. Results showed that Venturi nozzles significantly reduced drift with the two methodologies. Moreover, the wind tunnel method showed the same trend as the field results. Additionally, spray drift deposition variability was lower for the Venturi nozzles. Therefore, it could be concluded that Venturi nozzles can be recommended to be used in citrus orchards to prevent human and environmental risks and their use could be appropriate for different scenarios where spray drift risk must be mitigated. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2018-05-09T16:31:03Z 2018-05-09T16:31:03Z 2017 article acceptedVersion Torrent, X., Garcera, C., Molto, E., Chueca, P., Abad, R., Grafulla, C., Roman, C., Planas, S. (2017). Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift. Crop Protection, 96, 130-143. 0261-2194 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/6107 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.001 en Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ electronico
spellingShingle Torrent, Xavier
Garcerá, Cruz
Moltó, Enrique
Chueca, Patricia
Abad-Moyano, Raquel
Grafulla, Carmen
Román, Carla
Planas, Santiago
Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
title Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
title_full Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
title_fullStr Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
title_short Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
title_sort comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus part i effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/6107
work_keys_str_mv AT torrentxavier comparisonbetweenstandardanddriftreducingnozzlesforpesticideapplicationincitruspartieffectsonwindtunnelandfieldspraydrift
AT garceracruz comparisonbetweenstandardanddriftreducingnozzlesforpesticideapplicationincitruspartieffectsonwindtunnelandfieldspraydrift
AT moltoenrique comparisonbetweenstandardanddriftreducingnozzlesforpesticideapplicationincitruspartieffectsonwindtunnelandfieldspraydrift
AT chuecapatricia comparisonbetweenstandardanddriftreducingnozzlesforpesticideapplicationincitruspartieffectsonwindtunnelandfieldspraydrift
AT abadmoyanoraquel comparisonbetweenstandardanddriftreducingnozzlesforpesticideapplicationincitruspartieffectsonwindtunnelandfieldspraydrift
AT grafullacarmen comparisonbetweenstandardanddriftreducingnozzlesforpesticideapplicationincitruspartieffectsonwindtunnelandfieldspraydrift
AT romancarla comparisonbetweenstandardanddriftreducingnozzlesforpesticideapplicationincitruspartieffectsonwindtunnelandfieldspraydrift
AT planassantiago comparisonbetweenstandardanddriftreducingnozzlesforpesticideapplicationincitruspartieffectsonwindtunnelandfieldspraydrift