Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa

Meta-analysis has been recognised as a powerful method to synthetize existing published data from different studies through a formal statistical analysis. Several statistical models have been proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments against plant diseases using meta-analysis, but the sen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makowski, David, Vicent, Antonio, Pautasso, M., Stancanelli, G., Rafoss, T.
Formato: article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2017
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/5555
_version_ 1855032296993718272
author Makowski, David
Vicent, Antonio
Pautasso, M.
Stancanelli, G.
Rafoss, T.
author_browse Makowski, David
Pautasso, M.
Rafoss, T.
Stancanelli, G.
Vicent, Antonio
author_facet Makowski, David
Vicent, Antonio
Pautasso, M.
Stancanelli, G.
Rafoss, T.
author_sort Makowski, David
collection ReDivia
description Meta-analysis has been recognised as a powerful method to synthetize existing published data from different studies through a formal statistical analysis. Several statistical models have been proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments against plant diseases using meta-analysis, but the sensitivity of the estimated treatment effects to the model chosen has not been investigated in detail in the context of plant pathology. In this paper, four different statistical models were defined to analyse fungicide control trials with binary outcomes. These models were used to conduct a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of fungicide treatments against citrus black spot, a fungal disease caused by the quarantine pathogen Phyllosticta citricarpa. The models differed in the assumption made on the variability of the treatment effect (constant or variable between experimental plots) and in the method used for parameter estimation (classical or Bayesian). Odds ratios were estimated for two groups of fungicides, copper compounds and dithiocarbamates, widely applied for CBS control using each model in turn. Classical and Bayesian statistical models led to similar results, but the estimated treatment effectiveness and their associated levels of uncertainty were sensitive to the assumption made about the variability of the treatment effect. Estimated odds ratios were different depending on whether the treatment effect was assumed to be constant or variable between experimental plots. The size of the confidence intervals was underestimated when the treatment effect was assumed constant while it was variable in reality. Because of the strong between-plot variability, the 90 % percentiles of the odds ratios were much higher than the point estimates, and this result revealed that, in some plots, treatment effectiveness could be much lower than expected. Based on our results, we conclude that it is not sufficient to calculate point estimates of odds ratio when the between-plot variability of the treatment effect is strong and that, in such case, it is recommended to compute the predictive distributions of the odds ratio.
format article
id ReDivia5555
institution Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA)
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
record_format dspace
spelling ReDivia55552025-04-25T14:43:17Z Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa Makowski, David Vicent, Antonio Pautasso, M. Stancanelli, G. Rafoss, T. Meta-analysis has been recognised as a powerful method to synthetize existing published data from different studies through a formal statistical analysis. Several statistical models have been proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments against plant diseases using meta-analysis, but the sensitivity of the estimated treatment effects to the model chosen has not been investigated in detail in the context of plant pathology. In this paper, four different statistical models were defined to analyse fungicide control trials with binary outcomes. These models were used to conduct a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of fungicide treatments against citrus black spot, a fungal disease caused by the quarantine pathogen Phyllosticta citricarpa. The models differed in the assumption made on the variability of the treatment effect (constant or variable between experimental plots) and in the method used for parameter estimation (classical or Bayesian). Odds ratios were estimated for two groups of fungicides, copper compounds and dithiocarbamates, widely applied for CBS control using each model in turn. Classical and Bayesian statistical models led to similar results, but the estimated treatment effectiveness and their associated levels of uncertainty were sensitive to the assumption made about the variability of the treatment effect. Estimated odds ratios were different depending on whether the treatment effect was assumed to be constant or variable between experimental plots. The size of the confidence intervals was underestimated when the treatment effect was assumed constant while it was variable in reality. Because of the strong between-plot variability, the 90 % percentiles of the odds ratios were much higher than the point estimates, and this result revealed that, in some plots, treatment effectiveness could be much lower than expected. Based on our results, we conclude that it is not sufficient to calculate point estimates of odds ratio when the between-plot variability of the treatment effect is strong and that, in such case, it is recommended to compute the predictive distributions of the odds ratio. 2017-06-01T10:12:33Z 2017-06-01T10:12:33Z 2014 MAY 2014 article Makowski, D., Vicent, A., Pautasso, M., Stancanelli, G., Rafoss, T. (2014). Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 139(1), 79-94. 0929-1873 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/5555 10.1007/s10658-013-0365-6 en openAccess Impreso
spellingShingle Makowski, David
Vicent, Antonio
Pautasso, M.
Stancanelli, G.
Rafoss, T.
Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa
title Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa
title_full Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa
title_fullStr Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa
title_short Comparison of statistical models in a meta-analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa
title_sort comparison of statistical models in a meta analysis of fungicide treatments for the control of citrus black spot caused by phyllosticta citricarpa
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/5555
work_keys_str_mv AT makowskidavid comparisonofstatisticalmodelsinametaanalysisoffungicidetreatmentsforthecontrolofcitrusblackspotcausedbyphyllostictacitricarpa
AT vicentantonio comparisonofstatisticalmodelsinametaanalysisoffungicidetreatmentsforthecontrolofcitrusblackspotcausedbyphyllostictacitricarpa
AT pautassom comparisonofstatisticalmodelsinametaanalysisoffungicidetreatmentsforthecontrolofcitrusblackspotcausedbyphyllostictacitricarpa
AT stancanellig comparisonofstatisticalmodelsinametaanalysisoffungicidetreatmentsforthecontrolofcitrusblackspotcausedbyphyllostictacitricarpa
AT rafosst comparisonofstatisticalmodelsinametaanalysisoffungicidetreatmentsforthecontrolofcitrusblackspotcausedbyphyllostictacitricarpa